Purpose

This research aimed to examine the impact of input, process, output, productivity and outcome variables on university research performance and the indicators that represent them in order to improve academic quality and contribute to government policy.

Design/methodology/approach

The quantitative approach was used through a survey method that obtained samples using questionnaires from 150 leaders of research institutions and continued analysis using the structural equation modeling-partial least square (SEM-PLS) to test the developed model.

Findings

Except for the relationship between process and productivity variables, all variable relationships had a positive and significant effect. Furthermore, the input, process, output, productivity and outcome variables each include seven, twelve, four and ten indicators.

Research limitations/implications

This study has several ramifications because it provides a clear policy input and advances science. As a prelude to developing research performance assessment tools that take into account variances in a tertiary institution, this research aids in the implementation of national policies for assessing research performance in postsecondary institutions.

Originality/value

To improve the accuracy of the information acquired, we conducted a survey among the heads of research units at various higher-ranking Indonesian universities, taking into consideration their skill and experience in leading research organizations and conducting research. Other than that, our belief in the originality of our manuscript is strengthened by the way we applied systems theory to construct a performance evaluation model that examines each contribution made by each system aspect.

中文翻译：

---

大学研究绩效评估模型：来自印度尼西亚的证据

目的

本研究旨在探讨投入、过程、产出、生产力和成果变量对大学研究绩效的影响以及代表它们的指标，以提高学术质量并为政府政策做出贡献。

设计/方法论/途径

定量方法采用调查方法，通过对150名研究机构领导进行问卷调查获取样本，并使用结构方程建模-偏最小二乘法（SEM-PLS）继续分析以测试开发的模型。

发现

除了过程和生产率变量之间的关系外，所有变量关系都具有积极且显着的影响。此外，投入、过程、产出、生产率和结果变量各包括七个、十二个、四个和十个指标。

研究局限性/影响

这项研究有几个影响，因为它提供了明确的政策输入并推动了科学发展。作为开发考虑高等教育机构差异的研究绩效评估工具的前奏，这项研究有助于实施评估高等教育机构研究绩效的国家政策。

原创性/价值

为了提高所获取信息的准确性，我们对印度尼西亚各高等大学的研究单位负责人进行了调查，考虑了他们在领导研究组织和开展研究方面的技能和经验。除此之外，我们应用系统理论构建绩效评估模型来检查每个系统方面所做的每个贡献，这增强了我们对手稿原创性的信念。