In this article, the author examines with a specific focus on the insolvency practitioner to what extent the Recast European Insolvency Regulation's provisions on communication, cooperation and coordination between the main actors in group companies' insolvency proceedings allow for efficient restructurings of those group companies. In doing so, the author will, at points, compare the provisions in Chapter V of the Recast European Insolvency Regulation to—and draw inspiration from—the German provisions on groups of companies that were adopted into the German Insolvency Act (Insolvenzordnung) and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law's Model Law on Enterprise Group Insolvency. The author also aims to outline, among other things, the various forms of (cross‐border) communication, cooperation and coordination that the Recast European Insolvency Regulation obligates insolvency practitioners of groups of companies to engage in, how they should implement those forms of ‘CoCo’ and what would happen if they neglect to comply with those obligations. This article is Part II of a diptych on this topic; Part I was published in an earlier issue of this journal.

中文翻译：

---

欧洲破产条例下的群体关注和从业者之间的沟通与合作（第二部分）

在本文中，作者特别关注破产从业者，探讨了《欧洲破产条例重订》中有关集团公司破产程序中主要参与者之间的沟通、合作和协调的规定在多大程度上允许这些集团公司进行有效的重组。为此，作者将不时将重订的欧洲破产条例第五章中的规定与《德国破产法》(Insolvenzordnung) 中采用的德国关于公司集团的规定进行比较，并从中汲取灵感。联合国国际贸易法委员会企业集团破产示范法。作者还旨在概述重订的欧洲破产条例要求公司集团破产从业人员参与的各种形式的（跨境）沟通、合作和协调，以及他们应如何实施这些形式的“ CoCo' 以及如果他们忽视遵守这些义务会发生什么。本文是关于该主题的双联画的第二部分；第一部分发表在本期刊的早期期刊上。