In honouring Per Linell's achievements, I pursue how dialogue was traced back to praxis. Hence, I begin with how, countering generative theory as overblown, Linell found a hard middle way and, thus, adopted a modest realism. In early work, he traced phonology to what can be heard and, later, diagnosed exclusive emphasis on things or rules as written language bias. Since much depends on how we speak, verbalizing derives, in part, from the influence of others. In modelling speech performance, he therefore turns to a duality of planning and execution. Activity can be orienting to others and/or their doings and sayings. The pattern recurs in initiative-response analysis which effectively tracks isomorphisms in the push and pull of dialogue (initiative and response). Given samenesses, forms, ways of acting, and uses of wordings, we sustain the sociodialogical consciousness of practical and linguistic knowhow. Praxis prompts people to act, transcend situations, use dialogue, construct practical theories and, slowly, change their languaging. In scaling down, I argue that the future prospects of Linell's work lie in rethinking the interdisciplinary area that is concerned with languages, human practices and, above all, their effects.

中文翻译：

---

其他方向：揭示实践的根源

为了纪念佩尔·莱内尔的成就，我探讨了对话是如何追溯到实践的。因此，我首先阐述了莱内尔如何反对过分夸大的生成理论，找到了一条艰难的中间道路，从而采取了一种温和的现实主义。在早期的工作中，他将音系学追溯到可以听到的内容，后来将只强调事物或规则诊断为书面语言偏见。由于很大程度上取决于我们说话的方式，因此语言表达在一定程度上源于他人的影响。因此，在对言语表现进行建模时，他转向了计划和执行的二元性。活动可以针对他人和/或他们的行为和言论。该模式在主动响应分析中反复出现，该分析有效地跟踪对话的推和拉（主动和响应）中的同构。鉴于相同性、形式、行为方式和措辞的使用，我们维持了实践和语言知识的社会对话意识。实践促使人们采取行动，超越情境，使用对话，构建实用理论，并慢慢改变他们的语言。在缩小规模时，我认为莱内尔工作的未来前景在于重新思考与语言、人类实践以及最重要的是它们的影响有关的跨学科领域。