A critical review examined how childrens participation rights as represented in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child inform the work of pediatric teams in healthcare settings. We systematically searched peer-reviewed literature on the enactment of child participation rights, within the context of pediatric teams. Articles were evaluated using the LEGEND () tool. Data extraction and analysis highlighted themes and disparities between articles, as well as gaps. A total of 25 studies were selected. We reviewed studies from around the globe, with the majority of papers from the UK. Qualitative and mixed methods approaches were administered. The following observations were made: (1) limited language of children's rights exists in the literature, (2) lack of information regarding the composition of pediatric healthcare teams and how they work with children, (3) children's perspectives on what constitutes good interactions with healthcare providers are replicated, (4) minimal references to theory or philosophical underpinnings that can guide practice. Explicit references to children's participation rights are lacking in the literature which may reflect the absence of rights language that could inform pediatric practice. Descriptive understandings of the tenets of pediatric interprofessional team composition and collaboration are necessary if we are to imagine the child as part of the team along with their family. Despite these shortcomings, the literature alludes to children's ability to discern desirable interactions with healthcare providers.

中文翻译：

---

儿童的参与权和儿科医疗团队的作用：严格审查

一项批判性审查审查了《联合国儿童权利公约》中所代表的儿童参与权如何影响医疗机构中儿科团队的工作。我们在儿科团队的背景下系统地检索了有关制定儿童参与权的同行评审文献。使用 LEGEND () 工具对文章进行评估。数据提取和分析突出了文章之间的主题和差异以及差距。总共选择了 25 项研究。我们回顾了全球各地的研究，其中大部分论文来自英国。采用定性方法和混合方法。得出了以下观察结果：(1) 文献中有关儿童权利的语言有限，(2) 缺乏关于儿科医疗团队的组成以及他们如何与儿童合作的信息，(3) 儿童对什么构成与儿童良好互动的看法医疗保健提供者被复制，（4）对可以指导实践的理论或哲学基础的参考很少。文献中缺乏对儿童参与权的明确提及，这可能反映出缺乏可以为儿科实践提供信息的权利语言。如果我们要将孩子想象成与家人一起成为团队的一部分，那么对儿科跨专业团队组成和协作原则的描述性理解是必要的。尽管存在这些缺点，文献还是提到了儿童辨别与医疗保健提供者理想互动的能力。