Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to examine (a) whether Sensory Processing Sensitivity (SPS) measured at baseline (T0) predicts distress at one year follow-up (T1), and (b) whether and in what way resilience mediates the effect of SPS on distress. The study sample consisted of gifted adults. A total of 738 respondents participated in the study at T0 and T1 (mean age of 44.86; 63.4% female). Structural Equation Modeling and logistic regression analysis were conducted. A high level of SPS at T0 predicted psychological (anxiety and depression) and somatic (physical symptoms and fatigue) distress at T1. As far as indirect effects are concerned, results depended upon whether we looked at the negative or positive higher-order dimension of SPS. A higher score on negative SPS was associated with lower resilience which in turn led to more distress, indicating that low resilience increased the negative impact of negative SPS on distress. In contrast, a higher score on positive SPS was related to more resilience, resulting in less distress, suggesting that in this case resilience had a buffering effect. As resilience is a buffer between SPS and distress, follow-up research could focus on psychological interventions aimed at increasing resilience.

中文翻译：

---

感觉处理敏感性对由复原力介导的痛苦的影响有多大？在天才成年人样本中测试素质压力模型

摘要

这项前瞻性研究的目的是检验 (a) 基线 (T0) 测量的感觉处理敏感性 (SPS) 是否可以预测一年随访 (T1) 时的痛苦，以及 (b) 复原力是否以及以何种方式介导这种影响SPS 遇险情况。研究样本由有天赋的成年人组成。T0 和 T1 共有 738 名受访者参与了该研究（平均年龄 44.86 岁；63.4% 为女性）。进行了结构方程模型和逻辑回归分析。T0 时的高水平 SPS 可以预测 T1 时的心理（焦虑和抑郁）和躯体（身体症状和疲劳）痛苦。就间接影响而言，结果取决于我们是否关注 SPS 的负高阶维度或正高阶维度。负 SPS 得分越高，复原力越低，进而导致更多的痛苦，这表明低复原力增加了负 SPS 对痛苦的负面影响。相比之下，阳性 SPS 得分越高，弹性越大，从而减少痛苦，这表明在这种情况下，弹性具有缓冲作用。由于复原力是 SPS 和痛苦之间的缓冲，后续研究可以集中于旨在提高复原力的心理干预。