That there is a “crisis of peer review” at the moment is not in dispute, but sufficient attention has not yet been paid to the normative potential that lies in current calls for reform. In contrast to approaches to “fixing” the problems in peer review, which tend to maintain the status quo in terms of professionalising opportunities, this paper addresses the needs of philosophers and how peer‐review reform can be an opportunity to improve the academic discipline of philosophy, whereby progress is understood as making the discipline more fair to the global academic community and more conducive to the flourishing of academic philosophers. The paper evaluates recent categories of relevant norms and correlating reforms. In conclusion, it recommends that philosophy pursue the norms of transparency and democracy explicitly when proposing peer‐review reform and suggest that proposals for forum‐based models of peer review are most likely to support those norms.

中文翻译：

---

“需要一个村庄才能写出一篇真正好的论文”：哲学同行评审的规范框架

目前存在“同行评审危机”是无可争议的，但目前改革呼声中所蕴含的规范潜力尚未得到足够重视。与“解决”同行评审中的问题的方法（倾向于维持专业化机会的现状）相反，本文解决了哲学家的需求以及同行评审改革如何成为改善学术学科的机会。哲学，进步被理解为使该学科对全球学术界更加公平，更有利于学术哲学家的繁荣。本文评估了最近类别的相关规范和相关改革。总之，它建议哲学在提出同行评审改革时明确追求透明度和民主的规范，并建议基于论坛的同行评审模型的提案最有可能支持这些规范。