The article deals with language reflection, verbalization through metatexts, and interpretation. The expression of language reflection is defined in the works of writers and poets. The research is directed at investigating the text, realizing the process of interpreting the works of great poet A. Kunanbayev from the point of linguistic consciousness, and determining the results. The poet conveys information by utilizing various language tools and constructs that prompt self-questioning. The definitions of concepts, classifications, and characteristics related to language reflection are given. The authors aimed to identify language reflection in A. Kunanbayev’s works, classify reflexives marking the language reflection of the author, modeling them using the G. Gibbs’ model, and comparing them with the psycholinguistic survey materials within the framework of reflexive linguistics. The authors agree that there are two classifications of reflexives, such as metatextual commentary and metalanguage interpretation. As a result of the study, the poet’s self-reflection consisted of 6 elements (Gibbs’ cycle), through the lexico-semantic analysis of the reflexives the poet’s language units were classified as metatextual commentary and the respondents' answers as metalanguage interpretation. The syntactic structures of the language reflexives were determined, and it was found that they are often in interrogative and negative forms. According to the purpose of the article, the reflexives in the poet's poem were identified and classified into four groups (Describing the poet or providing additional information; Working on yourself; Working with character; Positive assessment) by the semantic nature of the respondents' interpretation of the work as a result of the psycholinguistic experiment.

本文涉及语言反思、通过元文本进行语言表达以及解释。语言反思的表达在作家和诗人的作品中得到定义。本研究旨在考察文本，体会从语言意识的角度解读伟大诗人库南巴耶夫作品的过程，并确定结果。诗人利用各种语言工具和结构来传达信息，从而引发自我质疑。给出了与语言反射相关的概念、分类和特征的定义。作者旨在识别 A. Kunanbayev 作品中的语言反射，对标记作者语言反射的反射进行分类，使用 G. Gibbs 模型对其进行建模，并在反射语言学框架内将它们与心理语言学调查材料进行比较。作者同意反身性有两种分类，例如元文本评论和元语言解释。研究结果表明，诗人的自我反思由6个要素组成（吉布斯循环），通过对反身性的词汇语义分析，将诗人的语言单位归类为元文本评论，将受访者的回答归类为元语言解释。确定了语言反身语的句法结构，发现它们经常采用疑问和否定形式。根据文章的目的，诗人诗歌中的反身性被识别，并根据受访者解释的语义性质分为四组（描述诗人或提供附加信息；研究自己；研究性格；积极评价）作为心理语言学实验的结果的工作。