In this paper, complementary perspectives from innovation management capabilities (IMC), the natural resource‐based view (NRBV) and the social resource‐based view (SRBV) are revisited in order to lay the theoretical foundation for developing evaluation framework for sustainability‐oriented innovation (SOI). Six dimensions of SOI are identified, as innovation focus, sustainability focus, integration intra‐organisation, integration inter‐organisation, ambidexterity, and emphasis on physical life cycle — which then lead to developing the key parameters for the evaluation framework. The proposed framework is validated through analysis of 25 cases from the manufacturing sector in Indonesia. Data were primarily collected through semi‐structured interviews and analysed using a polar diagram. This approach offered a comprehensive understanding of the qualitative data by assessing all six SOI dimensions simultaneously, presenting an effective visualisation of the firms' approach to SOI. The findings suggest that the majority of firms tend to adopt an operational optimisation approach when developing their SOI, while only a few opt for organisational transformational, and none choose the system building approach. This research paper makes a significant contribution to literature by introducing transition phases among SOI approaches, which were previously not explored in literature. The framework developed in this study would provide valuable support to practitioners in implementation and enhancement of their SOI practices.

中文翻译：

---

制造企业可持续发展创新：实施和评估框架

本文重新审视创新管理能力（IMC）、自然资源基础观（NRBV）和社会资源基础观（SRBV）的互补视角，为制定可持续发展评价框架奠定理论基础。创新（SOI）。 SOI 确定了六个维度，即创新焦点、可持续性焦点、组织内整合、组织间整合、双元性和对物理生命周期的重视，然后制定评估框架的关键参数。拟议的框架通过对印度尼西亚制造业 25 个案例的分析得到验证。数据主要通过半结构化访谈收集，并使用极坐标图进行分析。这种方法通过同时评估所有六个 SOI 维度，提供了对定性数据的全面理解，从而有效地可视化了公司的 SOI 方法。研究结果表明，大多数企业在开发 SOI 时倾向于采用运营优化方法，只有少数企业选择组织变革，没有一家选择系统构建方法。这篇研究论文通过介绍 SOI 方法之间的过渡阶段，对文献做出了重大贡献，这是以前文献中没有探讨过的。本研究中开发的框架将为从业者实施和增强 SOI 实践提供宝贵的支持。