Despite the fact that evidence of racial inequality in the U.S. criminal legal system has become overwhelming, the field of legal psychology has largely ignored issues of race and systemic racism. Although legal psychology focuses on a system that has disproportionately affected certain racial groups, and much of the field questions the fairness of the system, its research seems to rarely take a critical approach to account for racial and systemic factors that may shape an individual's psychological experience. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to analyze the lack of attention to race and racism in legal psychology, document the extent to which the field has historically attended to issues of race and systemic racism, and provide best practices for future research to embrace a critical race legal psychology. To document inattention to race and systemic racism, we query, code, and analyze all articles published in two of legal psychology's most influential journals (Law and Human Behavior and Psychology, Public Policy, and Law), finding, indeed, a dearth of articles on these topics.

中文翻译：

---

以种族为标志的体系中的无种族法律心理学

尽管美国刑事法律体系中种族不平等的证据已经变得压倒性的，但法律心理学领域在很大程度上忽视了种族和系统性种族主义问题。尽管法律心理学关注的是一个对某些种族群体产生不成比例影响的系统，并且该领域的许多人质疑该系统的公平性，但其研究似乎很少采取批判性方法来解释可能塑造个人心理体验的种族和系统因素。因此，本文的目的是分析法律心理学中对种族和种族主义缺乏关注的情况，记录该领域历史上关注种族和系统性种族主义问题的程度，并为未来的研究提供最佳实践。批判种族法律心理学。为了记录对种族和系统性种族主义的忽视，我们查询、编码和分析了两份法律心理学最有影响力的期刊上发表的所有文章（法律与人类行为和心理学、公共政策和法律），确实发现缺乏有关这些主题的文章。