While previous research has explored the impact of migration status on experiences and attributions about pregnancy loss, less common is comparative research examining similarities and differences between migrants and non-migrants. This paper reports on a cross sectional comparative study of 623 culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) or non-CALD people living in Australia. Participants completed a survey that asked about experiences of pregnancy loss, support, and attributions about pregnancy loss. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of rates of pregnancy loss, though CALD participants reported greater distress following a loss. CALD participants reported greater reliance on partners and faith communities, and found healthcare professionals to be less supportive. CALD participants were more likely to attribute pregnancy loss to spiritual reasons (among others), and non-CALD participants to fetal abnormalities. The paper concludes by calling for awareness campaigns and professional upskilling to better ensure the needs of CALD communities.

中文翻译：

---

探索移民身份在澳大利亚流产归因、经验和支持中的作用

虽然之前的研究探讨了移民身份对流产经历和归因的影响，但比较研究移民和非移民之间的相似点和差异的比较研究较少见。本文报告了对生活在澳大利亚的 623 名具有文化和语言多样性 (CALD) 或非 CALD 人群的横断面比较研究。参与者完成了一项调查，询问流产的经历、支持以及流产的归因。尽管 CALD 参与者报告流产后的痛苦更大，但两组之间的流产率没有差异。 CALD 参与者表示更加依赖合作伙伴和信仰社区，并发现医疗保健专业人员的支持程度较低。 CALD 参与者更有可能将流产归因于精神原因（以及其他原因），而非 CALD 参与者则将其归因于胎儿异常。该文件最后呼吁开展宣传活动和专业技能提升，以更好地满足 CALD 社区的需求。