当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Hepato Biliary Pancreat. Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Venous outflow reconstruction in living‐donor liver transplantation for Budd–Chiari syndrome involving vena cava
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences ( IF 3 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-25 , DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1430
Koichiro Hata 1, 2 , Takahiro Nishio 1 , Motoyuki Kumagai 3 , Yuki Masano 1 , Shoichi Kageyama 1 , Shinya Okumura 1 , Takashi Ito 1 , Kazuhiro Yamazaki 3 , Kenji Minatoya 3 , Etsuro Hatano 1
Affiliation  

Budd–Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a refractory veno-occlusive disease involving hepatic veins (HV) and/or inferior vena cava (IVC).1 Unlike in the West, hepatic IVC is characteristically involved in most BCS patients in the Asia-Pacific region, for example, 93% in Japan2 where ironically 90% of liver transplants (LT) are living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In deceased-donor LT, HV/IVC lesions in a patient can be totally replaced with a donor's healthy HV/IVC, but not by LDLT, leaving an unresolved dilemma of how to reconstruct HV/IVC in BCS-LDLT.

Conventionally, cavo-plasty, patch-plasty, or artificial graft replacement have been performed; however, once BCS lesions recur, patient mortality remains high.3-5 To prevent BCS recurrence, therefore, we developed a new technique for venous outflow reconstruction in LDLT. Briefly, the congested liver is excised with hepatic cava under veno-venous (VV)-bypass assistance (Figure 1a). On a back-table, hepatic IVC is isolated and scrutinized from not only outside but also inside the vessel under good direct view (Figures 1b,c and 2c; Video S1). After resecting the lesion, only the healthy portion is harvested; reversed the cranio-caudal ends for extra safety (Figure 1c,d); and the originally-caudal end of the auto-cava, that is, the part farthest from BCS lesions, is anastomosed to the intrapericardial IVC root or directly to the right atrium if the IVC root is affected. The remaining gap of IVC is interposed with an artificial graft, if necessary (Figure 2d,e). Then HV is anastomosed to the healthy auto-cava end-to-side. We can thus create the hepatic venous outflow using only healthy blood vessels, thereby minimizing the potential risk of BCS recurrence.

Details are in the caption following the image
FIGURE 1
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Schematic illustration of our surgical technique. (a) The pericardium is opened, in which the IVC root is taped and secured. Then the congested liver is excised en bloc with the hepatic IVC under veno-venous (VV)-bypass assistance as needed (VV-bypass is sometimes unnecessary in chronic BCS with well-developed collaterals, typically azygos and/or hemiazygos veins). To prevent splanchnic congestion, the portal vein is also cannulated to return the splanchnic venous outflow to the superior vena cava via VV-bypass. (b) On a back-table, the hepatic cava is isolated/retrieved from the explanted liver. (c) After examining the lesion from the outside, the cava is everted and also scrutinized from the luminal side. After resecting the diseased portion and then returning the inside/outside eversion, only the healthy part of auto-IVC graft is harvested. (d) Further, to make doubly sure, the cranial side is inverted inferiorly, and the originally caudal end of the auto-cava, that is, the part farthest from the BCS lesions, is anastomosed to the IVC root in the pericardium or directly to the right atrium if the IVC root is affected. (e) Then the liver graft is put-in, and the HV is anastomosed to the healthy auto-transplanted cava in an end-to-side fashion. The remaining gap of IVC is interposed with an artificial graft, if necessary. BCS, Budd–Chiari syndrome; HV, hepatic vein; IVC, inferior vena cava.
Details are in the caption following the image
FIGURE 2
Open in figure viewerPowerPoint
Pre- and intraoperative images of the IVC lesion and reconstruction. (a, b) Early/arterial and delayed/venous phases of coronal scan images, respectively, of the preoperative dynamic CT focusing on the IVC lesion. In this case, the IVC lesion was more clearly delineated in the early rather than delayed phases, but not enough to completely identify all the lesions. (c) A representative image showing IVC inspection from inside the vessel (lumen side). Under good direct vision on a back-table, the lesions, for example, obliterated, thrombosed, fibrotic, or even just thickened, can be easily and reliably identified. (d) An image representing IVC reconstruction using the harvested auto-IVC graft, corresponding to Figure 1d. In this case, a ringed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft was used for IVC interposition. (e) An image displaying HV anastomosis of a right hemi-liver graft to the auto-transplanted cava using continuous suture with 5–0 prolene. It is also important to open the IVC wide enough to create a large anastomotic orifice extending halfway around the right (graft) side. This procedure intrinsically reduces the potential risk of post-transplant BCS recurrence by using the autologous IVC that is confirmed healthy from both inside and outside the vessel. Furthermore, to ensure extra safety, the cranial and caudal ends of the harvested auto-IVC are reversed, and the originally caudal end, which is farthest from the BCS lesion and thus considered the healthiest, is anastomosed to the IVC root in the pericardium, that is, the most downstream anastomosis. The patient was discharged 3 weeks post-transplant with no surgical complications. She has been doing well for 2 years afterward with no BCS recurrence. BCS, Budd–Chiari syndrome; CT, computed tomography; HV, hepatic vein; IVC, inferior vena cava.

We have performed this procedure in the current four BCS-LDLT patients with 0% disease recurrence and 100% patient survival. Our novel strategy, en bloc excision of the liver with hepatic cava; ex vivo harvest of the healthy part of auto-cava; and its auto-transplant venous/caval reconstruction, appears safe and feasible for BCS-LDLT.



中文翻译:

涉及腔静脉的布加综合征活体肝移植中的静脉流出道重建

布加综合征(BCS)是一种累及肝静脉(HV)和/或下腔静脉(IVC)的难治性静脉闭塞性疾病。1与西方不同,亚太地区的大多数 BCS 患者都患有肝脏 IVC,例如,日本的这一比例为 93% 2讽刺的是,日本 90% 的肝移植 (LT) 是活体肝移植 (LDLT)。在已故供者 LT 中,患者的 HV/IVC 病变可以完全用供者的健康 HV/IVC 代替,但不能用 LDLT 代替,从而留下了如何在 BCS-LDLT 中重建 HV/IVC 的未解决的困境。

传统上,已进行腔体成形术、补片成形术或人工移植物置换术;然而,一旦BCS病变复发,患者死亡率仍然很高。3-5因此,为了防止 BCS 复发,我们开发了一种在 LDLT 中进行静脉流出道重建的新技术。简而言之,在静脉-静脉(VV)旁路辅助下用肝静脉切除充血的肝脏(图1a)。在后桌上,肝脏 IVC 不仅在外部而且在血管内部都被隔离并在良好的直接观察下进行检查(图 1b、c 和 2c;视频 S1)。切除病灶后,只收获健康部分;反转头尾端以获得额外的安全性(图1c,d);将自体静脉原尾端,即距离BCS病灶最远的部分,与心包内IVC根部吻合,如果IVC根部受累,则直接与右心房吻合。如有必要,IVC 的剩余间隙可插入人工移植物(图 2d、e)。然后将 HV 与健康的自动静脉端侧吻合。因此,我们可以仅使用健康的血管来产生肝静脉流出,从而最大限度地减少 BCS 复发的潜在风险。

详细信息位于图片后面的标题中
图1
在图查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
我们的手术技术的示意图。 (a) 打开心包,将 IVC 根部用胶带粘住并固定。然后,根据需要在静脉-静脉 (VV) 旁路辅助下将充血的肝脏与肝 IVC 一起切除(对于具有发育良好的侧支循环(通常是奇静脉和/或半奇静脉)的慢性 BCS,有时不需要 VV 旁路)。为了防止内脏充血,还对门静脉插管,通过 VV 旁路将内脏静脉流出物返回上腔静脉。 (b) 在后桌上,从移植的肝脏中分离/回收肝静脉。 (c) 从外部检查病变后,将静脉外翻并从管腔侧进行检查。切除病变部分,然后将内/外外翻返回后,仅收获自体IVC移植物的健康部分。 (d) 进一步,为了更加确定,将颅侧向下翻转,将自静脉原尾端,即距 BCS 病灶最远的部分,与心包内的 IVC 根部吻合或直接吻合如果 IVC 根部受到影响,则转移至右心房。 (e) 然后将肝移植物放入,并将 HV 以端侧方式与健康的自体移植静脉吻合。如有必要,可用人工移植物插入 IVC 的剩余间隙。 BCS,布加综合征; HV,肝静脉; IVC,下腔静脉。
详细信息位于图片后面的标题中
图2
在图查看器中打开微软幻灯片软件
IVC 病变和重建的术前和术中图像。 (a,b) 术前动态 CT 聚焦 IVC 病变的冠状扫描图像的早期/动脉期和延迟/静脉期。在这种情况下,下腔静脉病变在早期阶段比延迟阶段更清晰地描绘出来,但不足以完全识别所有病变。 (c) 代表性图像显示从血管内部(管腔侧)进行 IVC 检查。在后台上良好的直视下,可以轻松可靠地识别病变,例如消失的、血栓形成的、纤维化的、甚至只是增厚的病变。 (d) 使用收获的自体 IVC 移植物进行 IVC 重建的图像,对应于图 1d。在这种情况下,环状膨体聚四氟乙烯 (ePTFE) 接枝物用于 IVC 插入。 (e) 显示右半肝移植物与自体移植静脉的 HV 吻合的图像,使用 5-0 Prolene 连续缝合。同样重要的是,打开 IVC 足够宽,以形成一个围绕右侧(移植物)延伸一半的大吻合口。该手术通过使用从血管内部和外部均已确认健康的自体 IVC,从本质上降低了移植后 BCS 复发的潜在风险。此外,为了确保额外的安全性,将收获的自体IVC的头端和尾端颠倒过来,并将最初的尾端(距离BCS病变最远,因此被认为是最健康的)与心包中的IVC根部吻合,也就是最下游的吻合。患者在移植后 3 周出院,没有出现手术并发症。两年后,她的情况一直很好,BCS 没有复发。 BCS,布加综合征; CT,计算机断层扫描; HV,肝静脉; IVC,下腔静脉。

我们已经在目前的 4 名 BCS-LDLT 患者中进行了该手术,疾病复发率为 0%,患者存活率为 100%。我们的新策略是用肝静脉整块切除肝脏;离体收获 Auto-cava 的健康部分;及其自体移植静脉/腔静脉重建对于 BCS-LDLT 来说似乎是安全可行的。

更新日期:2024-03-25
down
wechat
bug