当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Lond. Math. Soc. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The ℓp norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh transform for even integer p
Journal of the London Mathematical Society ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2024-03-27 , DOI: 10.1112/jlms.12888
Rodrigo Bañuelos 1 , Mateusz Kwaśnicki 2
Affiliation  

The long-standing conjecture that for p ( 1 , ) $p \in (1, \infty)$ the p ( Z ) $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ norm of the Riesz–Titchmarsh discrete Hilbert transform is the same as the L p ( R ) $L^p(\mathbb {R})$ norm of the classical Hilbert transform, is verified when p = 2 n $p = 2 n$ or p p 1 = 2 n $\frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$ , for n N $n \in \mathbb {N}$ . The proof, which is algebraic in nature, depends in a crucial way on the sharp estimate for the p ( Z ) $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ norm of a different variant of this operator for the full range of p $p$ . The latter result was recently proved by the authors (Duke Math. J. 168 (2019), no. 3, 471–504).

中文翻译:

偶数 p 的 Riesz–Titchmarsh 变换的 ℓp 范数

长期以来的猜测是,对于 p ε 1 , 无穷大 $p \in (1, \infty)$ p Z $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ Riesz–Titchmarsh 离散希尔伯特变换的范数与 L p $L^p(\mathbb {R})$ 经典希尔伯特变换的范数,在以下情况下得到验证 p = 2 n $p = 2 n$ 或者 p p - 1 = 2 n $\frac{p}{p - 1} = 2 n$ , 为了 n ε $n \in \mathbb {N}$ 。这个证明本质上是代数的,在很大程度上取决于对 p Z $\ell ^p(\mathbb {Z})$ 该运算符的不同变体的范数适用于整个范围 p $p$ 。后一个结果最近被作者证明(Duke Math. J . 168 (2019), no. 3, 471–504)。
更新日期:2024-03-27
down
wechat
bug