Journal assessment is of great significance to promote the development of academic platforms. Citation analysis is a recognised tool to assess the citation performance of journals. However, due to the shortcomings such as the inflated Journal Impact Factor and heterogeneity of the citations, additional dimensions are necessary to be considered to balance with the article citation. This article constructs a three-dimensional journal assessment framework to measure the comprehensive influence of a journal based on article citation, author and institution influence. The CRITIC-Entropy weighting method is employed to calculate the weighted average scores for the three dimensions, respectively. Then, a newly defined Pareto-dominated set-based sum of TOPSIS score (PDS-based STS) approach is developed to assess the comprehensive influence of journals. A sample of 76 journals in Economics field is selected to demonstrate the effectiveness and validity of the proposed assessment method. The Chartered Association of Business Schools’ Academic Journal Guide 2021 (CABS-AJG 2021) which is an expert-based journal rating is chosen as a baseline model. It has been found that the assessment method using PDS-based STS shows a more rational journal ranking than that based on the Journal Impact Factor if using the CABS-AJG 2021’s ratings as the benchmark model.

中文翻译：

---

通过基于文章引用、作者和机构影响力的三维框架评估期刊

期刊评估对于促进学术平台的发展具有重要意义。引文分析是评估期刊引文表现的公认工具。但由于期刊影响因子虚高、引文异质性等缺点，需要考虑额外的维度来平衡文章引文。本文构建了基于文章引用、作者和机构影响力的三维期刊评估框架来衡量期刊的综合影响力。采用CRITIC-Entropy加权方法分别计算三个维度的加权平均分。然后，开发了一种新定义的帕累托主导的基于集合的TOPSIS评分总和（基于PDS的STS）方法来评估期刊的综合影响力。选取经济学领域的76种期刊作为样本，验证了所提出的评估方法的有效性和有效性。选择特许商学院协会的《2021 年学术期刊指南》(CABS-AJG 2021) 作为基准模型，该指南是基于专家的期刊评级。研究发现，如果以CABS-AJG 2021的评级为基准模型，基于PDS的STS评估方法比基于期刊影响因子的评估方法显示出更合理的期刊排名。