“Filial harm” refers to harms experienced by a parent and caused by their child, with increasing umbrella terminology developing to capture all forms of harm despite differing experiences and contexts. In this paper, based on a Glaserian Grounded Theory study underpinned by participatory research principles, this work utilized diaries and interactive interviews with 34 parents and arts-based workshops with 21 children to develop a new terminology and approach to child and adolescent-to-parent violence and abuse when harm does not have a clear intent. Explosive and harmful impulses refer to preadolescents experiencing proactive, reactive, affective, and relational harms and needs. These specific forms of filial harm are based upon underlying needs, and the maladaptive ways children may attempt to meet their needs result in filial harm as an unintended consequence rather than being a form of harm with intent. Using an approach that captures subsections of filial harm, there is opportunity to better represent the nuance of individual family experiences and could provide more appropriate language and interventions that better represent the language used by families themselves. Future interventions, support pathways, and research with families living with explosive and harmful impulses could use the provided framework to understand why children are attempting to meet their needs in harmful ways and to consider less harmful methods of support.

中文翻译：

---

爆炸性和有害的冲动：儿童和青少年对父母的暴力和虐待的一部分

“子女伤害”是指父母经历的以及孩子造成的伤害，尽管经历和背景不同，但越来越多的总括术语不断发展以涵盖所有形式的伤害。本文以参与式研究原则为基础的格拉泽扎根理论研究为基础，利用日记和对 34 名家长的互动访谈以及对 21 名儿童进行的艺术研讨会，开发了一种关于儿童和青少年与家长之间的新术语和方法伤害没有明确意图时的暴力和虐待。爆炸性和有害冲动是指青春期前的青少年经历主动性、反应性、情感性和关系性的伤害和需求。这些具体形式的孝道伤害是基于潜在的需求，而儿童可能试图满足其需求的适应不良方式会导致孝道伤害作为一种意想不到的结果，而不是一种有意的伤害形式。使用捕获孝道伤害的子部分的方法，有机会更好地代表个人家庭经历的细微差别，并可以提供更合适的语言和干预措施，更好地代表家庭本身使用的语言。未来的干预措施、支持途径以及对生活在爆炸性和有害冲动的家庭的研究可以使用所提供的框架来理解为什么儿童试图以有害的方式满足他们的需求，并考虑危害较小的支持方法。