As a subset of remote work, digital nomadism crosses jurisdictions and generates fears that it unfairly escapes regulation and taxation. Alongside other circuits of an emerging world society, it fails to fit neatly into the longstanding template of relatively self‐contained nation‐states. Most efforts to address this new phenomenon merely aim to tweak tax treaties and other rules, so as better to slot mobile individuals back into existing schemes of regulation and redistribution. But digital nomadism suggests a more fundamental need to rethink the entire modern framework of social citizenship. Social citizenship bundles together immobile populations, territorial sovereignty, and the state as the main clearinghouse of justice and solidarity. In mapping out an alternative, this article draws on resources in political thought dealing with a plurality of spheres of life. Unbundling the strictly territorial functions of the state from other functions of risk‐sharing and solidarity would better correspond to the new and varied scales of cross‐border living.

中文翻译：

---

数字游牧和对社会公民的挑战

作为远程工作的一个子集，数字游牧主义跨越司法管辖区，并引发人们对其不公平地逃避监管和税收的担忧。与新兴世界社会的其他循环一样，它无法完全融入相对独立的民族国家的长期模式。大多数解决这一新现象的努力只是为了调整税收协定和其他规则，以便更好地将流动个人重新纳入现有的监管和再分配计划。但数字游牧主义表明，更根本的是需要重新思考社会公民的整个现代框架。社会公民身份将流动人口、领土主权以及作为正义和团结的主要信息交换所的国家捆绑在一起。在制定替代方案时，本文借鉴了涉及生活多元化领域的政治思想资源。将国家严格的领土职能与风险分担和团结的其他职能分开，将更好地适应新的、多样化的跨境生活规模。