当前位置: X-MOL 学术Epilepsy Behav. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment of epilepsy in Indonesia
Epilepsy & Behavior ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2024-04-23 , DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109787
Eric Tanoto , Herlyani Khosama , Seilly Jehosua , Sekplin A.S. Sekeon , Winifred Karema , Arthur H.P. Mawuntu , Fima F.L.G. Langi , Lim Kheng Seang

Adverse skin reactions due to drugs such as Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) occur in 3% of people receiving anti epileptic drugs (AED). Although SJS/TEN has a low incidence, the mortality and morbidity rates are high. Indonesia has not adopted HLA-B*1502 screening prior to administration of carbamazepine (CBZ), although previous studies found a relationship between HLA-B*1502 and SJS/TEN. A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed to evaluate three strategies for treating newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: CBZ direct therapy, levetiracetam (LEV) direct therapy, and therapy based on HLA-B*15:02 test results. From a societal perspective, base case and sensitivity analyses were carried out over a lifetime. Direct administration of CBZ appears to have a slightly lower average cost than the HLA-B*15:02 allele screening strategy. The increase in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment related to the cost difference reached 0.519 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of around USD 984 per unit of QALY acquisition. Direct treatment of LEV increased treatment costs by almost USD 2000 on average compared to the standard CBZ strategy. The increase in QALY is 0.834 in direct levetiracetam treatment, with an ICER of around USD 2230 for each QALY processing. Calculation of the cost-effectiveness of lifetime epilepsy therapy in this study found that the initial screening strategy with the HLA-B*15:02 test was the most cost-effective.

中文翻译:

印度尼西亚癫痫治疗前 HLA-B*15:02 筛查的成本效益分析

在接受抗癫痫药物 (AED) 治疗的患者中,有 3% 的人会出现史蒂文斯约翰逊综合征 (SJS) 和中毒性表皮坏死松解症 (TEN) 等药物引起的皮肤不良反应。尽管SJS/TEN的发病率较低,但死亡率和发病率较高。尽管之前的研究发现 HLA-B*1502 与 SJS/TEN 之间存在关系,但印度尼西亚尚未在卡马西平 (CBZ) 给药前进行 HLA-B*1502 筛查。开发了混合决策树和马尔可夫模型来评估治疗新诊断局灶性癫痫的三种策略:CBZ 直接治疗、左乙拉西坦 (LEV) 直接治疗以及基于 HLA-B*15:02 测试结果的治疗。从社会角度来看,基本案例和敏感性分析是在一生中进行的。直接施用 CBZ 的平均成本似乎比 HLA-B*15:02 等位基因筛查策略略低。治疗前 HLA-B*15:02 筛查中质量调整生命年 (QALY) 的增加与成本差异相关,达到 0.519,每单位 QALY 获取的增量成本效益比 (ICER) 约为 984 美元。与标准 CBZ 策略相比,LEV 的直接治疗平均增加了近 2000 美元的治疗成本。直接左乙拉西坦治疗的 QALY 增加了 0.834,每次 QALY 处理的 ICER 约为 2230 美元。本研究对终生癫痫治疗的成本效益进行计算发现,采用 HLA-B*15:02 检测的初始筛查策略最具成本效益。
更新日期:2024-04-23
down
wechat
bug