Abstract
Introduction
During sensory evaluations of minty products, white chocolate is proposed as a palate cleanser between sample tastings. However, this is not an evidence-based practice, as no literature proves this. The aim of this study was therefore to identify the best palate cleanser to use in sensory evaluation of minty confectionery products.
Methods
Three chewing gums with different cooling intensity were chewed for 3 min by a trained panel and evaluated for overall cooling, nose tingling, mouth burning, minty aroma, and sweetness. After the sample tasting, the following different palate cleansers were proposed: low-salt breadstick, whole milk, milk chocolate, white chocolate, and sunflower oil, compared with the resting time (control). The residual sensations were measured for the next 15 min.
Results
Breadstick and seed oil are the most effective palate cleansers on overall cooling carry-over. White chocolate seems to be effective on mint aroma, but this is likely to be due to its strong flavour, masking other perceptions. Moreover, both white and milk chocolates affect negatively the sweetness perception, by increasing it soon after the consumption, and even impacting on the next sample evaluation.
Conclusions
None of the palate cleansers were able to fully re-establish the oral environment after 15 min. Therefore, further studies on combinations, or on repeated use of the same palate cleanser, are proposed.
Implications
The use of an effective palate cleanser can reduce the time for product testing and increase data precision. Finding a proper palate cleanser for minty products is a strategy to optimise sensory evaluations in confectionery industry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abe J, Hosokawa H, Okazawa M, Kandachi M, Sawada Y, Yamanaka K, Matsumura K, Kobayashi S (2005) TRPM8 protein localization in trigeminal ganglion and taste papillae. Mol Brain Res 136:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.01.013
Behrendt H-J, Germann T, Gillen C, Hatt H, Jostock R (2009) Characterization of the mouse cold-menthol receptor TRPM8 and vanilloid receptor type-1 VR1 using a fluorometric imaging plate reader (FLIPR) assay. Br J Pharmacol 141(4):737–745. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0705652
Cayeux I, Starkenmann (2016) Sensory characterization of compounds with a trigeminal effect for taste modulation purposes. In: Guichard E, Salles C, Morzel M, Le Bon A (eds) Flavour: from food to perception. Wiley, pp 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118929384.ch8
Chaya C (2017) Continuous time-intensity. In: Hort J, Kemp SE, Hollowood T (eds) Time-dependent measures of perception in sensory evaluation. Wiley, pp 237–266
Cliff M, Heymann H (1993) Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation: a review. Food Res Int 26:375–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-9969(93)90081-S
Colonna AE, Adams DO, Noble AC (2004) Comparison of procedures for reducing astringency carry-over effects in evaluation of red wines. Aust J Grape Wine Res 10:26–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2004.tb00005.x
Craighead DH, McCartney NB, Tumlinson JH, Alexander LM (2017) Mechanisms and time course of menthol-induced cutaneous vasodilation. Microvasc Res 110:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2016.11.008
Davidson JM, Linforth RST, Hollowood TA, Taylor AJ (1999) Effect of sucrose on the perceived flavor intensity of chewing gum. J Agric Food Chem 47:4336–4340. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9901082
de Roos KB (1994) Physicochemical models of flavour release from foods. In: Roberts DD, Taylor AJ (eds) Flavour release, ACS Symposium Series, 763. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 126–141
Delarue J, Loescher E (2004) Dynamics of food preferences: a case study with chewing gums. Food Qual Prefer 15:771–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.11.005
Duizer LM, Bloom K, Findlay CJ (1996) Dual-attribute time-intensity measurement of sweetness and peppermint perception of chewing gum. J Food Sci 61:636–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb13175.x
Eccles R (1994) Menthol and related cooling compounds. J Pharm Pharmacol 46:618–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1994.tb03871.x
Foster KD, Grigor JMV, Cheong JN, Yoo MJY, Bronlund JE, Morgenstern MP (2011) The role of oral processing in dynamic sensory perception. J Food Sci 76:R49–R61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.02029.x
Green BG (2005) Lingual heat and cold sensitivity following exposure to capsaicin or menthol. Chem Senses 30(Suppl. 1):i201–i202. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjh184
Guinard J-X, Mazzucchelli R (1999) Effects of sugar and fat on the sensory properties of milk chocolate: descriptive analysis and instrumental measurements. J Sci Food Agric 79:1331–1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199908)79:11<1331::AID-JSFA365>3.0.CO;2-4
Guinard J-X, Zoumas-Morse C, Walchak C, Simpson H (1997) Relation between saliva flow and flavor release from chewing gum. Physiol Behav 61:591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(96)00508-2
Gwartney E, Heymann H (1995) The temporal perception of menthol. J Sens Stud 10:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1995.tb00028.x
Haahr A-M, Bardow A, Thomsen CE, Jensen SB, Nauntofte B, Bakke M, Adler-Nissen J, Bredied WLP (2004) Release of peppermint flavour compounds from chewing gum: effect of oral functions. Physiol Behav 82(2–3):531–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.061
Hort J, Kemp SE, Hollowood T (2017) Time-dependent measures of perception in sensory evaluation. Wiley
Johnson EA, Vickers Z (2004) The effectiveness of palate cleansing strategies for evaluating the bitterness of caffeine in cream cheese. Food Qual Prefer 15:311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00071-5
Karashima Y, Damann N, Prenen J, Talavera K, Segal A, Voets T, Nilius B (2007) Bimodal action of menthol on the transient receptor potential channel TRPA1. J Neurosci 27:9874–9884. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2221-07.2007
Klein AH, Carstens MI, Zanotto KL, Sawyer CM, Ivanov M, Cheung S, Carstens E (2011) Self- and cross-desensitization of oral irritation by menthol and cinnamaldehyde (CA) via peripheral interactions at trigeminal sensory neurons. Chem Senses 36:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjq115
Kozyreva TV, Kozaruk VP, Tkachenko EY, Khramova GM (2010) Agonist of TRPM8 channel, menthol, facilitates the initiation of thermoregulatory responses to external cooling. J Therm Biol 35:428–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2010.09.004
Kuesten C (2017) Time-intensity using discrete time points. In: Hort J, Kemp SE, Hollowood T (eds) Time-dependent measures of perception in sensory evaluation. Wiley, pp 182–236
Labbe D, Gilbert F, Antille N, Martin N (2009) Sensory determinants of refreshing. Food Qual Prefer 20(2):100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.09.001
Lee WE, Pangborn RM (1986) Time-intensity: the temporal aspects of sensory perception. Food Technol 40(11):71–82
Lee CA, Vickers ZM (2010) Discrimination among astringent samples is affected by choice of palate cleanser. Food Qual Prefer 21:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.003
Lucak CL, Delwiche JF (2009) Efficacy of various palate cleansers with representative foods. Chemosens Percept 2:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-009-9036-6
Macpherson LJ, Hwang SW, Miyamoto T, Dubin AE, Patapoutian A, Story GM (2006) More than cool: promiscuous relationships of menthol and other sensory compounds. Mol Cell Neurosci 32:335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2006.05.005
Market Research Report (2018) Opportunities in the global confectionery sector: analysis of opportunities offered by high growth economies. GlobalData 1–154. https://www.candyindustry.com/products/549-opportunities-in-the-global-confectionery-sector-analysis-of-opportunities-offered-by-high-growth-economies
McKemy DD (2013) The molecular and cellular basis of cold sensation. ACS Chem Neurosci 4(2):238–247. https://doi.org/10.1021/cn300193h
McKemy DD, Neuhausser WM, Julius D (2002) Identification of a cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in thermosensation. Nature 416:52–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature719
O’Mahony M (1974) Taste adaptation: the case of the wandering zero. Food Technol 9:1):1–1)12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb01739.x
O’Mahony M, Godman L (1974) The effect of interstimulus procedures on salt taste thresholds. Percept Psychophys 16(3):459–465. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198572
Ovejero-Lopez I, Bro R, Bredie WIP (2005) Univariate and multivariate modelling of flavour release in chewing gum using time intensity: a comparison of data analytical methods. Food Qual Prefer 16:327–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.014
Peier AM, Moqrich A, Hergarden AC, Reeve AJ, Andersson DA, Story GM, Earley TJ, Dragoni I, McIntyre P, Bevan S, Patapoutian A (2002) A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli and menthol. Cell 108:705–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00652-9
Petit CEF, Hollowood TA, Wulfert F, Hort J (2007) Colour–coolant–aroma interactions and the impact of congruency and exposure on flavour perception. Food Qual Prefer 18(6):880–889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.02.003
Piccone P, Rastelli SL, Pittia P (2011) Aroma release and sensory perception of fruit candies model systems. Procedia Food Sci 1:1509–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.223
Ployon S, Morzel M, Canon F (2017) The role of saliva in aroma release and perception. Food Chem 226:212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.01.055
Raithore S, Peterson DG (2018) Effects of polyol type and particle size on flavor release in chewing gum. Food Chem 253:293–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.01.123
Ross CF, Hinken C, Weller K (2007) Efficacy of palate cleansers for reduction of astringency carryover during repeated ingestions of red wine. J Sens Stud 22:293–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00107.x
Seo Y, Kwak HS, Kim M, Jeong Y, Lee Y (2015) Effectiveness of palate cleansers on various alcoholic beverages. J Inst Brew 121:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.248
Verma RS, Rahman L, Verma RK, Chauhan A, Yadav AK, Singh A (2010) Essential oil composition of menthol mint (Mentha arvensis) and peppermint (Mentha piperita) cultivars at different stages of plant growth from Kumaon region of Western Himalaya. J Med Aromat Plants 1(1):13–18
Vickers Z, Morris EE, Savaria M (2008) Effectiveness of palate cleansers for evaluating sourness. J Sens Stud 23:526–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00170.x
Voilley A, Souchon I (2006) Flavour retention and release from food matrix: an overview. In: Voilley A, Etievant P (eds) Flavour in food. Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, pp 117–132
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the members of the Perfetti Van Melle trained sensory panel for their collaboration and to the Perfetti Van Melle R&D management for supporting this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Claudia Pannitteri, Maria Laura Corollaro, and Ivano Caprioli declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pannitteri, C., Corollaro, M.L. & Caprioli, I. Effectiveness of Several Palate Cleansers on Carry-Over Effect of Minty Chewing Gums. Chem. Percept. 13, 106–118 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-019-09271-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-019-09271-x