Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter April 15, 2020

An accelerated and effective synthesis of zinc borate from zinc sulfate using sonochemistry

  • Ali Can Ersan , Azmi Seyhun Kipcak , Meral Yildirim Ozen and Nurcan Tugrul EMAIL logo

Abstract

Recently, sonochemistry has been used for the synthesis of inorganic compounds, such as zinc borates. In this study using zinc sulphate heptahydrate (ZnSO4·7H2O) and boric acid (H3BO3) as starting materials, a zinc borate compound in the form of Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O was synthesized using an ultrasonic probe. Product’s characterization was carried out with using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopy. Zinc borate compound’s chemical bond structure was observed with Raman and FTIR. From the XRD results it was seen that Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O can be quickly synthesized upon heating at 80°C and 85°C (55 min) or 90°C (45 min) in very high yield (>90%). The minimum particle size obtained was ~143 μm from the SEM results. Zinc borate compound was synthesized at a lower temperature in less time than other synthesized zinc metal compound in literature.

1 Introduction

Zinc borate (ZB) compounds are used in a wide range of applications in plastics, ceramics, electrical insulation, wood, wire, cement, pharmaceuticals, paint, and rubber (Ata et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2009; Gao and Liu., 2009; Gönen et al., 2009; Gürhan et al., 2009; Igarashi et al., 2004; Nies and Campbell, 1980; Schubert et al., 2002; Yumei et al., 2006). Zinc borates can be used as non-flammable and fire retardant additives in PVC, halogenated polyester and nylon, as combustion retardants and corrosive inhibitors, in the manufacture of refractory plastic materials, in electric/electronic materials, in the textile and paper industries and as a fungicide/insecticide in wood accessories (Gürhan et al., 2009; Schubert et al. 2002).

Several studies have been carried out towards the synthesis of zinc borate using a hydrothermal method. Gürhan et al. (2009) carried out 3.5 mol hydrated zinc borate’ synthesis and examined synthesis parameters’ effects. Nies and Campbell (1980) carried out the synthesis of zinc borate using sodium potasium tetraborate (K2B4O7) and zinc chloride, bromide, sulfate and nitrate as the starting materials at 95°C for 5.5, 6 and 24 h., respectively. Yumei et al. (2006) obtained crystal and hydrophobic zinc borate nanodiscs using borax tetraborate decahydrate (Na2B4O7·10H2O) and zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4·7H2O) via a hydrothermal method. Oleic acid was used as a modifying agent. The reaction was realized at 70°C for 6.5 h. Igarashi et al. (2004) have synthesized zinc borate using a two-step reaction. This involved heating boric acid (H3BO3) and zinc oxide (ZnO) at 60°C for 1.5 h. to form the initial crystals of zinc borate, which were then further heated at 90°C for 4 h. Gao and Liu (2009) studied the synthesis of zinc borate hydrated minerals under reflux conditions with 11 h. Ata et al. (2011) have studied the synthesis of zinc borates using zinc oxide (ZnO) and boric acid (H3BO3) at 68-120°C, a rotating speed of 333-767 rpm over 60-200 min. At the end of their study, the optimum yield was obtained at 85°C, 766 rpm and 183 min with the conversion of zinc oxide found to be 99%. Chen et al. (2009) carried out the synthesis of ZB nano-flakes (2ZnO·2B2O3·3H2O) with the coordination and homogeneous precipitation of ammonia, borax (Na2B4O7·10H2O) and zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O). Zheng et al. (2009) produced zinc 4ZnO·B2O3·H2O that is form of zinc borate using with Zn(NO3)2·6H2O. Acarali et al. (2013) examined different modification agents’ effects used to procure hydrophobic zinc borate product at between 50-120°C over 1-5 h. Kipcak et al. (2016) obtained zinc borate from boric acid and zinc oxide 1-5 h and at 95°C.

Sonochemical systems create multi-bubble environments in which chemical reactions occur with the strong and rapid connection of the reactants. In a sonochemical synthesis, the chemical reactions are carried out using the kinetic energy supplied from acoustic cavitation. The acoustic cavitation ensures high pressure, high temperature and high energy levels to the reactants for a very short period of time and accelerates the reactions with high reaction efficiencies (Lupacchini et al., 2017; Mettin et al., 2015; Timothy et al., 2017).

The hydrothermal synthesis of zinc borates has been widely studied and reported in the literature. In our research group, we have studied the ultrasonic synthesis of zinc borates using ZnO and Zn5(CO3)2·(OH)6 as the starting materials (Ersan et al., 2016). Due to the high cost of the starting materials used these two studies with respect to ZnSO4·7H2O, this study’s novelty is the cheap and rapid synthesis’s of zinc borate by using the method of sonochemistry.

2 Results and discussion

2.1 The starting materials’ XRD results

The starting materials were characterized by XRD analysis. ZnSO4·7H2O was identified as “goslarit (ZnSO4·7H2O)” with the powder diffraction file (pdf) No. 01-075-0949. Na2B4O7·5H2O was identified as “tincalconite (Na2B4O7·5H2O)” with the pdf No. 00-007-0277. Na2B4O7·10H2O was identified as “borax (Na2B4O7·10H2O)” with the pdf No. 01-075-1078. The commercial zinc borate was defined as “zinc oxide borate hydrate (Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O)” with the pdf No. 00-035-0433.

2.2 The as-synthesized zinc borate compounds’ XRD results and their reaction yields

According to the XRD results, the as-synthesized compound was defined as “zinc oxide borate hydrate (Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O)” with the pdf No. “00-035-0433” and was identical to that previously reported in the literature (Bardakci et al., 2013; Ersan et al., 2016; Kipcak et al., 2014, 2015, 2016; Vardar et al., 2017). The as-synthesized zinc borate compound’s XRD results are given in Figure 1.

Figure 1 The XRD scores of the as-synthesized zinc borate compounds.
Figure 1

The XRD scores of the as-synthesized zinc borate compounds.

According to the XRD results, the minimum required reaction time to complete formation of zinc borate was 55 min at 80°C and 85°C and 45 min at 90°C in SET-1; 55 min at 85°C and 45 min at 90°C in SET-2 and 55 min at 80°C, 50 min at 85°C and 45 min at 90°C in SET-3. In SET-1, at 80°C and 50 min the zinc borate was partly synthesized. The lowest XRD score was obtained in SET-1 and the highest XRD score was procured in SET-2. The XRD score is a similarity measure of the as-synthesized compound with the reference pdf card. Meaning that all of the peak intensities (%) and peak locations matched perfectly with the pdf card number of reference mineral, the XRD score of analyzed mineral is equal to 100 (Kipcak et al., 2016).

The compounds’ XRD patterns with the highest XRD scores are given in Figure 2. The characteristic peaks are in mutual agreement with the studies reported in the literature (Ersan et al., 2016; Kipcak et al., 2014, 2015, 2016; Vardar et al., 2017). In addition, the as-obtained XRD scores were slightly higher than those previously reported in the literature (Table 1).

Figure 2 The XRD patterns of the high-scoring zinc borate compounds.
Figure 2

The XRD patterns of the high-scoring zinc borate compounds.

The reaction yields are given in Figure 3, which shows that the reaction yields were increased by the increase in reaction time and temperature. In addition, the highest and the lowest reaction yields were obtained in SET-3, and SET-1, respectively. The highest reaction yields were procured at 90°C over 55 min for all of the sets, which were calculated to be 98.3 ± 0.2%, 98.4 ± 0.2% and 99.2 ± 0.3% for SET-1, SET-2 and SET-3, respectively. In accordance with the XRD scores, the reaction yields were found to be higher than those previously reported in the literature and significantly higher than those reported by Ersan et al. (2016) and Vardar et al. (2017).

Figure 3 The reaction yields of the as-synthesized zinc borate compounds.
Figure 3

The reaction yields of the as-synthesized zinc borate compounds.

2.3 The as-synthesized zinc borate compounds’ FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy

The optimum zinc borate compounds’ recorded IR spectra from chosen reactions are given in Figure 4. The range of bands 1412 cm-1 and 1253 cm-1 are associated with the three-coordinate boron to oxygen bonds’ [νas(B(3)-O)] asymmetric stretching. The range of bands 1196 cm-1 and 1113 cm-1 correspond to the boron-oxygen-hydrogen bonds’ bending [δ(B-O-H)]. The IR peaks around 1064 cm-1 can be attributed to the four-coordinate boron to oxygen bonds’ asymmetric stretching [νas(B(4)-O)]. The IR peaks observed at ~930 cm-1 are associated with the three-coordinate boron to oxygen bonds’ symmetric stretching [νs(B(3)-O)]. The bands between 858 cm-1 and 798 cm-1 correspond to the four-coordinate boron to oxygen bonds’ symmetric stretching. [νs(B(4)-O)]. The IR peak at 753 cm-1 corresponds to the vibrations which belong to the [νp(B(OH)4)-] band. The IR peaks observed at ~659 cm-1 are attributed to the three-coordinate boron to oxygen bonds’ the bending [γ(B(3)-O)]. The bands are in mutual agreement with the studies of Ersan et al. (2016), Kipcak et al. (2014, 2015, 2016) and Vardar et al. (2017).

Figure 4 The FT-IR spectra of the selected zinc borate compounds.
Figure 4

The FT-IR spectra of the selected zinc borate compounds.

Table 1

The synthesis parameters used to prepare Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O compound previously reported in the literature.

Synthesis methodStarting materialsReaction Temp. (°C)Reaction time (min)XRD ScoreReaction yield (%)Reference
HydrothermalZnO-H3BO395120n.a.86.78Bardakci et al., 2013
801807087.10Kipcak et al., 2014
901806891.80Kipcak et al., 2014
1001207595.70Kipcak et al., 2014
ZnSO4·7H2O-NaOH- H3BO3701808088.10Kipcak et al., 2015
801808193.00Kipcak et al., 2015
901207896.10Kipcak et al., 2015
ZnCl2-NaOH-H3BO3702407086.50Kipcak et al., 2015
801206175.50Kipcak et al., 2015
901207597.80Kipcak et al., 2015
ZnSO4·7H2O- Na2B4O7·5H2O-H3BO3702406986.50Kipcak et al., 2016
802407296.50Kipcak et al., 2016
901807299.60Kipcak et al., 2016
ZnCl2-Na2B4O7·5H2O-H3BO37024068*n.a.Kipcak et al., 2016
801207086.20Kipcak et al., 2016
901207287.70Kipcak et al., 2016
UltrasonicationZnO-H3BO380556489.10Ersan et al., 2016
85556592.40Ersan et al., 2016
90506093.20Ersan et al., 2016
Zn5(CO3)2·(OH)6 -H3BO380505590.34Vardar et al., 2017
85405691.38Vardar et al., 2017
90405891.79Vardar et al., 2017

The zinc borate compounds’ recorded Raman spectra from chosen reactions are given in Figure 5. The peaks at ~1047 cm-1 originate from νas(B(4)-O) and the νp(B(OH)4)- scattering was observed at ~755 cm-1. The peaks at 664 cm-1 correspond to the bending of γ(B(3)-O) and the peaks corresponding to the (B(3)–O) / δ(B(4)–O) bonds are observed at 579 cm-1. Obtained bands are in mutual agreement with the studies of Ersan et al. (2016), Kipcak et al. (2014, 2015, 2016) and Vardar et al. (2017).

Figure 5 The Raman spectra of the selected zinc borate compounds.
Figure 5

The Raman spectra of the selected zinc borate compounds.

2.4 Synthesized zinc borate compounds SEM results

SEM images of the selected samples of zinc borate obtained from each reaction set are displayed in Figure 6. It can be observed that for all the starting materials, the as-obtained zinc borate compounds were agglomerates of sub-microscale elliptic particles. When the morphology of the as-synthesized zinc borate particles was compared with that of a previous study, in which ZnSO4·7H2O was used as the zinc source, it was observed that the use of an ultrasonic synthesis method changed the shape of the as-obtained particles given in Kipcak et al. (2016). For SET-1, products’ particle size was observed to be between 942.52 nm and 179.11 nm. On the other hand, when sodium borate was used as the boron source, products’ particle size was reduced to 143.41 nm (SET-2). For SET-3, the particle products’ particle size was observed to be between 596.63 nm and 156.03 nm.

Figure 6 The SEM morphologies of the selected zinc borate compounds: (a) SET-1, (b) SET-2 and (c) SET-3 (10000× magnification).
Figure 6

The SEM morphologies of the selected zinc borate compounds: (a) SET-1, (b) SET-2 and (c) SET-3 (10000× magnification).

3 Conclusion

In this study, zinc borate in the form of Zn3B6O12·3.5H2O was synthesized from various boron sources and ZnSO4·7H2O via a sonochemical synthesis method. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be drawn:

  • Ultrasonification reduced the synthesis time of zinc borate to 45 min at 90°C and the reaction yield using these synthesis parameters was 98.4 ± 0.3%.

  • The spectroscopic results showed that the products had the characteristic band vibrations in both the IR and visible-light regions.

  • The SEM images of the zinc borate compounds proved that the synthesis method influenced the particle morphology and size.

  • Being an energy saving, rapid and effective method makes this sonochemical synthesis an alternative pathway for the green synthesis of zinc borate.

Experimental

Reagents

The boron starting materials, H3BO3, Na2B4O7·10H2O and Na2B4O7·5H2O, were provided from Bandırma Boron Works (Eti Maden, Balıkesir, Turkey) with a minimum purity of 99.9%. The other starting materials, ZnSO4·7H2O (purity ≥97.0%) and NaOH (purity ≥99.0%) were provided from Merck Chemicals (Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and used without any pretreatment. Commercial seed of zinc borate provided from Melos A.Ş. (Melos A.Ş., Istanbul, Turkey) was used in the synthesis. The XRD analysis of starting materials was performed on a PANalytical Xpert Pro (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer (XRD) using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.53 Å) at 45 kV and 40 mA.

Synthesis of the compounds

Several pre-experiments were performed to obtain the optimum rate of starting materials for zinc borate synthesis. Among these pre-experiments, the optimum ratio of the zinc and boron starting materials was found to be 1:7 in SET-1 and 1:8 in SET-2 and SET-3, respectively. At these ratios, the expected reactions are given by Eq. 1-3:

(1)ZnSO47H2O(s)+2NaOH(s)+7H3BO3(s)+xH2O(l)13(Zn3B6O123.5H2O)(s)+Na2SO4(aq)+5H3BO3(aq)+yH2O(l)
(2)ZnSO47H2O(s)+Na2B4O75H2O(s)+4H3BO3+xH2O(l)13(Zn3B6O123.5H2O)(s)+Na2SO4(aq)+6H3BO3(aq)+yH2O(l)
(3)ZnSO47H2O(s)+Na2B4O710H2O(s)+4H3BO3(s)+xH2O(l)13(Zn3B6O123.5H2O)(s)+Na2SO4(aq)+6H3BO3(aq)+yH2O(l)
Table 2

The quantity of starting materials used in the zinc borate syntheses.

SET-1ZnSO4·7H2O (mol)NaOH (mol)H3BO3(mol)Zn/B (mol/mol)
0.0180.0360.1267
SET-2ZnSO4·7H2O (mol)Na2B4O7·5H2O (mol)H3BO3 (mol)Zn/B (mol/mol)
0.0180.0180.0728
SET-3ZnSO4·7H2O (mol)Na2B4O7·10H2O (mol)H3BO3 (mol)Zn/B (mol/mol)
0.0180.0180.0728

For the sonochemical synthesis, a temperature controlled batch type glass reactor (100 mL capacity) equipped with a cooling jacket was used. Pure water obtain from a GFL 2004 instrument (Gesellschaft für Labortechnik, Burgwedel, Germany) was used as the liquid medium. In the synthesis, the appropriate amount of H3BO3 was dissolved in 25 mL of pure water and heated to the target temperature. ZnSO4·7H2O, NaOH and commercial zinc borate seed (1% w/w as H3BO3) were then added for SET-1. Na2B4O7·5H2O and Na2B4O7·10H2O were used instead of NaOH for SET-2 and SET-3, respectively. The amounts of the starting materials used are given in Table 2.

A Bandelin Sonopuls HD 2070 (20 kHz) model ultrasonic homogenizer (Bandelin electronic GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) was used for the synthesis. After the determined reaction time, the slurry was filtered and washed with purified water (70-80°C) to remove the unreacted H3BO3 and Na2SO4 from the synthesized zinc borate compound. Then, the resulting solid was dried using an EcoCELL 111 model incubator (MMM Medcenter Einrichtungen GmbH, Planegg, Germany) at 105°C to remove the excess water. The reaction procedure is identical to that reported to Ersan et al. (2016). For examine reaction parameters’ effects on the as-synthesized compounds, the synthesis procedure was repeated at 80, 85 and 90°C and with reaction times of 40, 45, 50 and 55 min, respectively.

3.1 Zinc borate compounds’ characterization

The as-synthesized zinc borate compounds were characterized by XRD analysis, Raman spectroscopy and FTIR. The crystalline structure of the products was analyzed using XRD. The reaction efficiency calculations were carried out using ZnSO4·7H2O as the limiting reactant. The reaction efficiency (YD) was calculated using Eq. 4 (Fogler, 1999):

(4)YD=NDNAONA

where ND presents consumed key reactant’s number of moles. NA0 and NA present key reactant’s the initial and final moles.

The FT-IR spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Spectrum One model FT-IR spectrometer (PerkinElmer, MA, USA) equipped with a universal attenuation total reflectance (ATR) sampling accessory in the spectral range between 1800-650 cm-1. The as-synthesized zinc borate samples’ Raman spectra were measured on a Perkin Elmer Raman Station 400F (PerkinElmer, CT, USA) Raman spectrometer’s range between 1600-250 cm-1. These spectral ranges were selected due to the characteristic vibration range of boron minerals. The morphology and surface properties of the zinc borate particles were observed on a CamScan brand Apollo 300 field-emission SEM (CamScan, Oxford, UK) equipped with a back-scattering electron (BSE) detector at 15 kV. The magnification was set to 10000.


tel: +90-212 3834771, fax: +90-212 3834725

References

Acarali N.B., Tugrul N., Derun E.M., Piskin S., Production and characterization of hydrophobic zinc borate by using palm oil. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater., 2013, 20, 1081-1088.10.1007/s12613-013-0837-xSearch in Google Scholar

Ata O.N., Sayan E., Engin, B., Optimization and Modeling of Zinc Borate (2ZnO·3B2O3·3.5H2O) Production with the Reaction of Boric Acid and Zinc Oxide. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2011, 17, 493-497.10.1016/j.jiec.2010.09.018Search in Google Scholar

Bardakci M., Acarali N.B., Tugrul N., Derun E.M., Piskin M.B., Production of Zinc Borate for Pilot-Scale Equipment and Effects of Reaction Conditions on Yield. Mater. Sci.-Medzg., 2013, 19, 158-163.10.5755/j01.ms.19.2.4432Search in Google Scholar

Chen T., Deng J.-C., Wang L.-S., Feng G., Preparation and characterization of nano-zinc borate by a new method. J. Mater. Process. Tech., 2009, 209, 4076-4079.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.029Search in Google Scholar

Ersan A.C., Yildirim M., Kipcak A.S., Tugrul N., A Novel Synthesis of Zinc Borates from a Zinc Oxide Precursor via Ultrasonic Irradiation. Acta Chim. Slov., 2016, 63, 881-890.10.17344/acsi.2016.2842Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Fogler H.S., Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Gao Y.H., Liu Z., Synthesis of an industrially important zinc borate, 2ZnO·3B2O3·3H2O, by a rheological phase reaction method. Thermochim. Acta, 2009, 484, 27-31.10.1016/j.tca.2008.11.013Search in Google Scholar

Gönen M., Balkose D.R., Gupta B., Ulku S., Supercritical carbondioxide drying of methanol zincborate mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2009, 48, 6869-6876.10.1021/ie9003046Search in Google Scholar

Gürhan D., Çakal G.Ö., Eroğlu İ., Özkar S., Improved Synthesis of Fine Zinc Borate Particles Using Seed Crystals. J. Cryst. Growth, 2009, 311, 1545-1552.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.01.111Search in Google Scholar

Igarashi H., Sawada H., Tatebe A., Sakao K., Zinc borate and production method and use there of. European Patent Office, Patent No: EP 1 205 439 A, 2004, 1-38.Search in Google Scholar

Kipcak A.S., Acarali N.B., Derun E.M., Tugrul N., Piskin S., Effect of magnesium borates on the fire-retarding properties of zinc borates. J. Chem., 2014, 512164, 1-12.10.1155/2014/512164Search in Google Scholar

Kipcak A.S., Senberber F.T., Derun E.M., Tugrul N., Piskin S., Characterization and thermal dehydration kinetics of zinc borates synthesized from zinc sulfate and zinc chloride. Res. Chem. Intermediat., 2015, 41, 9129-9143.10.1007/s11164-015-1952-2Search in Google Scholar

Kipcak A.S., Senberber F.T., Yildirim M., Yuksel S.A., Derun E.M., Tugrul N., Characterization and physical properties of hydrated zinc borates synthesized from sodium borates. Main Group Met. Chem., 2016, 39, 59-66.10.1515/mgmc-2016-0002Search in Google Scholar

Lupacchini M., Mascitti A., Giachi G., Tonucci L., d’Alessandro N., Martinez J., et al., Sonochemistry in non-conventional, green solvents or solvent-free reactions. Tetrahedron, 2017, 73, 609-653.10.1016/j.tet.2016.12.014Search in Google Scholar

Mettin R., Cairós C., Troia A., Sonochemistry and bubble dynamics. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2015, 25, 24-30.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.08.015Search in Google Scholar

Nies N.P., Campbell N.P.G.W., Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry. Longman, London, United Kingdom, 1980, 53-231.Search in Google Scholar

Schubert D., Alam F., Visi M., Knobler C., Structural Characterization and Chemistry of the Industrially Important Zinc Borate, Zn[B3O4(OH)3 Chem. Mat., 2002, 15, 866-871.10.1021/cm020791zSearch in Google Scholar

Timothy J.M., Sonochemistry and sonoprocessing: the link, the trends and (probably) the future. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2017, 10, 175-179.10.1016/S1350-4177(03)00086-5Search in Google Scholar

Vardar D.S., Senberber F.T., Kıpçak A.S., Tuğrul N., A green sonochemical synthesis of zinc borates from Zn5(CO32·(OH)6 Main Group Chem., 2017, 16, 160-170.10.3233/MGC-170234Search in Google Scholar

Yumei T., Yupeng G., Jiang M., Sheng Y., Bala H., Zhang G., et al., Synthesis of hydrophobic zinc borate nanodiscs for lubrication. Mater. Lett., 2006, 60, 2511-2515.10.1016/j.matlet.2006.01.108Search in Google Scholar

Zheng Y., Tian Y., Ma H., Qu Y., Wang Z., An D., et al., Synthesis and Performance Study of Zinc Borate Nanowhiskers. Colloid. Surface. A, 2009, 339, 178-184.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.02.018Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2019-11-11
Accepted: 2020-02-14
Published Online: 2020-04-15
Published in Print: 2020-04-15

© 2020 Ersan et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 19.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2020-0002/html
Scroll to top button