Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter June 21, 2020

New crystal structures of alkali metal tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borates

  • Daniel Duvinage , Artem Schröder , Enno Lork and Jens Beckmann EMAIL logo

Abstract

The crystal structures of the salts [Li(1,2-F2C6H4)] [B(C6F5)4] (1) and Cs[B(C6F5)4] (2) comprise six Li···F contacts (1.965(3) − 2.312(3) Å) and twelve Cs···F contacts (3.0312(1) − 3.7397(2) Å), respectively, which are significantly shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii (3.29 and 4.90 Å).

Polyfluorinated tetraarylborate ions, such as [B{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}4] “BArF” and [B(C6F5)4] (Scheme 1), have received numerous applications as weakly coordinating anions (Krosssing and Raabe, 2004; Riddlestone et al., 2018), which also stimulated research into their alkali metal salts. Very recently, for the former, the crystal structures of [Li(H2O)][B{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}4], M[B{3,5-(CF3)2C6H3}4] (M = Na, K) were described (Martínez-Martínez and Weller, 2019). For the latter, the crystal structures of [Li(C6H6)][B(C6F5)4]·benzene (Bolte et al., 2005), [Li(MeC6H5)][B(C6F5)4]·toluene, [Li(Et2O)4][B(C6F5)4], [Li(Et2O)4][B(C6F5)4]·CH2Cl2 (Kuprat et al., 2010; Martin et al., 2010), [Li(MeCN)4][B(C6F5)4] (Zhang et al., 2012) and K[B(C6F5)4] (Protchenko et al., 2016) were reported. In this work we convey two new crystal structures of the same anion.

Crystals of [Li(1,2-F2C6H4)][B(C6F5)4] (1) were obtained by recrystallization of [Li(Et2O)4][B(C6F5)4] from 1,2-difluorobenzene. The key feature of 1 (Figure 1) is the presence of six Li···F contacts (1.965(3) - 2.312(3) Å) that are significantly shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii (3.29 Å) and the absence of π-interactions between cation the electron poor aromatic rings. By contrast, in the crystal structure of [Li(C6H6)][B(C6F5)4]·benzene (Bolte et al., 2005) and [Li(MeC6H5)][B(C6F5)4]·toluene (Kuprat et al., 2010), the cations show also π-interactions with the electron rich solvate molecules. The cesium salt Cs[B(C6F5)4] (2) crystallized in the rare cubic space group I4¯3d(a=19.213(1)Å). It is isostructural with the previously known thallium compound Tl[B(C6F5)4] (a = 19.10(1) Å) (Parvez et al., 2005). The cell volume of 2 (V = 7092(1) Å3) is smaller than that of Tl[B(C6F5)4] (V = 6962(8) Å3), which can be attributed to the smaller ion radius of cesium (1.67 Å) compared to thallium (1.5 Å). The key feature of 2 (Figure 2) is the presence of twelve Cs···F contacts (3.0312(1)-3.7397(2) Å), respectively, which are significantly shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii (4.90 Å). These distances are consistent with those observed for Cs[H2NB2(C6F5)6], which shows even sixteen Cs···F contacts (Pollak et al., 2016).

Figure 1 Crystal structure of [Li(1,2-F2C6H4)][B(C6F5)4] (1) showing 50% probability ellipsoid and the essential atomic numbering. Cation anion contacts [Å]: Li1-F1 2.053(3), Li1-F2 2.090(3), Li1-F11 1.968(3), Li1-F21 1.965(3), Li1-F44a 2.312(3), Li1-F45a 2.018(3).
Figure 1

Crystal structure of [Li(1,2-F2C6H4)][B(C6F5)4] (1) showing 50% probability ellipsoid and the essential atomic numbering. Cation anion contacts [Å]: Li1-F1 2.053(3), Li1-F2 2.090(3), Li1-F11 1.968(3), Li1-F21 1.965(3), Li1-F44a 2.312(3), Li1-F45a 2.018(3).

Figure 2 Crystal structure of Cs[B(C6F5)4] (2) showing 50% probability ellipsoid and the essential atomic numbering. Cation anion contacts [Å]: Cs1-F1 3.0312(1), Cs1-F2 3.7397(2), Cs1-F3 3.1943(1), Cs1-F5 3.3292(1).
Figure 2

Crystal structure of Cs[B(C6F5)4] (2) showing 50% probability ellipsoid and the essential atomic numbering. Cation anion contacts [Å]: Cs1-F1 3.0312(1), Cs1-F2 3.7397(2), Cs1-F3 3.1943(1), Cs1-F5 3.3292(1).

1 X-ray crystallography

Single crystals of 1 were obtained by drying [Li(Et2O)4] [B(C6F5)4] in high vacuum (5·10-3 bar) at 140°C for 24 h and recrystallization from 1,2-difluorobenzene and n-hexane (Romanato et al., 2010). Single crystals of 2 were obtained by ion exchange of 1 in 1,2-difluorobenzene with Cesium fluoride followed by filtration and addition of n-hexane (Mon et al., 2013). Intensity data were collected on a Bruker Venture D8 diffractometer with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kα (0.7107 Å) radiation. The structure was solved by direct methods and difference Fourier synthesis with subsequent Full-matrix least-squares refinements on F2, using all data (Dolomanov, 2009). All non-hydrogen atoms were refined using anisotropic displacement parameters. Hydrogen atoms attached to carbon atoms were included in geometrically calculated positions using a riding model. Crystal and refinement data are collected in Table 1. Figures were created using DIAMOND (Brandenburg and Putz, 2006). Crystallographic data for the structural analysis has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC numbers 1974618 (1) and 1974619 (2).

Table 1

Crystal data and structure refinement of [Li(1,2-F2C6H4) B(C6F5)4] (1) and [CsB(C6F5)4] (2).

12
FormulaC30H4BF22LiC24BCsF20
Formula weight, g mol–1800.08394.74
Crystal systemmonocliniccubic
Crystal size, mm0.5 × 0.5 × 0.40.3 × 0.3 × 0.3
Space groupP21/nI‾43d
a, Å13.9256(5)19.213(1)
b, Å12.4375(5)19.213(1)
c, Å15.9947(5)19.213(1)
α, °9090
β, °92.016(1)90
γ, °9090
V, Å32768.6(2)7092(1)
Z412
ρcalcd, Mg m–31.9202.281
T, K100100
m (Mo ), mm–10.2151.741
F(000)15604608
θ range, deg2.20 to 33.232.60 to 30.43
Index ranges–21 ≤ h ≤ 21–27 ≤ h ≤ 23
–18 ≤ k ≤ 19–27 ≤ k ≤ 23
–24 ≤ l ≤ 24–20 ≤ l ≤ 27
No. of reflns collected10815423264
Completeness to θmax99.9%99.9%
No. indep. Reflns106301805
No. obsd reflns with (I>2σ(I))83911695
No. refined params487105
GooF (F2)1.0371.110
R1 (F) (I > 2σ(I))0.04440.0277
wR2 (F2) (all data)0.12720.0749
(Δ/σ)max< 0.001< 0.001
Largest diff peak/hole, e Å–30.706 / –0.5050.514 / –0.632
Scheme 1 Weakly coordinating polyfluorinated tetraarylborate “BArF” ions.
Scheme 1

Weakly coordinating polyfluorinated tetraarylborate “BArF” ions.

Copies of this information may be obtained free of charge from The Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam. ac.uk or http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk)

  1. Conflict of interest: One of the authors (Jens Beckmann) is a member of the Editorial Board of Main Group Metal Chemistry.

References

Bolte M., Ruderfer I., Müller T., Lithium-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate-benzene (1/1/2). Acta Crystallogr. 2005, E61, m1581-m1582.10.1107/S1600536805022336Search in Google Scholar

Brandenburg K., Putz H., DIAMOND V3.1d. Crystal Impact GbR, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

Dolomanov O.V., Bourhis L.J., Gildea R.J., Howard A.K., Puschmann H., OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr., 2009, 42, 339-341.10.1107/S0021889808042726Search in Google Scholar

Krossing I., Raabe I., Noncoordinating anions-fact or fiction? A survey of likely candidates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 2066-2090.10.1002/anie.200300620Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Kuprat M., Lehmann M., Schulz A., Villinger A., Synthesis of Pentafluorophenyl Silver by Means of Lewis Acid Catalysis: Structure of Solver Solvent Complexes. Organometallics, 2010, 29, 1421-1427.10.1021/om901063aSearch in Google Scholar

Martin E., Hughes D.L., Lancaster S.J., The composition and structure of lithium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate diethyletherate. Inorg. Chim. Acta, 2010, 363, 275-278.10.1016/j.ica.2009.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Martínez A.J., Weller A.S., Solvent-free anhydrous Li+ Na+ and K+ salts of [B(3,5-(CF32C6H34 [BArF4 Improved synthesis and solid-state structures. Dalton Trans., 2019, 48, 3551-3554.10.1039/C9DT00235ASearch in Google Scholar

Mon I., Jose D.A., Vidal-Ferran A., Bis(phosphite) Ligands with Distal Regulation: Application in Rhodium-mediated Asymmetric Hydroformylations. Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19, 2720-2725.10.1002/chem.201203677Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Parvez M., Piers W.E., Ghesner I., Thallium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate. Acta Cryst., 2005, E61, m1801-m1803.10.1107/S1600536805025808Search in Google Scholar

Pollak D., Goddard R., Pörschke K.-R., Cs[H2NB2(C6F56 Featuring an Unequivocal 16-Coordinate Cation. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 9444-9451.10.1021/jacs.6b02590Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Protchenko A.V., Bates J. I., Saleh L.M.A., Blake M.P., Schwarz A.D., Kolychev E.L., et al., Enabling and probing oxidative addition and reductive elimination at a Group 14 metal center: cleavage and functionalization of E-H bonds by a bis(boryl)stannylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 4555-4564.10.1021/jacs.6b00710Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Riddlestone I.M., Kraft A., Schaefer J., Krossing I., Taming the Cationic Beast: Novel Developments in the Synthesis and Application of Weakly Coordinating Anions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2018, 57, 13982-14024.10.1002/anie.201710782Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Romanato P., Duttwyler S., Linden A., Baldridge K.K., Siegel J.S., Intramolecular Halogen Stabilization of Silylium Ions Directs Gearing Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 7828-7829.10.1021/ja9109665Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Zhang B., Köberl M., Pöthig A., Cokoja M., Herrmann W.A., Kühn F.E., Synthesis and Characterization of Imidazolium Salts with the Weakly Coordinating [B(C6F54 Anion. Z. Naturforsch., 2012, 67b, 1030-1036.10.5560/znb.2012-0180Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-01
Accepted: 2020-05-12
Published Online: 2020-06-21

© 2020 Duvinage et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 30.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mgmc-2020-0011/html
Scroll to top button