Skip to main content
Log in

A Contemporary Concept of Organizational Control: Its Dependence on Shared Values and Impact on Motivation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Schmalenbach Business Review Aims and scope

Abstract

Increasing global competition and new technological developments have fostered the need and possibilities to enhance organizational efficiency by increasingly outsource or automate routine tasks. These developments lead to increasingly complex settings. The increasing complexity of organizational processes and shifts in societal values to higher priorities of personal autonomy have led to issues in using classical control mechanisms such as output and behaviour controls, due to the declining measurability of outputs, increasing degree of knowledge required concerning the actual processes, and their limitation of personal autonomy. This paper extends knowledge about control by investigating the role of self-control as an alternative to classical control mechanisms. Particularly, we analyze how a reliance on shared values can be used for purposes of control, along with their motivational consequences. The results of a cross-sectional survey of 346 managers emphasize two methods of fostering intrinsic motivation: (1) employing self-control in the presence of shared values; and (2) combining output and behaviour control in the absence of shared values. This study contributes to the understanding of organizational controls by providing a contemporary concept of control relying on autonomy (i.e. self-control), first empirical evidence of shared values as an important antecedent, and by focusing on organizational controls as systems, thus considering their interactive motivational effects. Consequently, the results reveal that the simultaneous use of both output and behaviour control mechanisms can mitigate their particular disadvantages; while a mere reliance on output controls enhances extrinsic motivation and diminishes intrinsic motivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Organizational values form the basis of actual behaviour (Schein 1996) and should hence also influence organizational control mechanisms. Accordingly, the different control mechanisms are at least semantically connected with particular value dimensions. Nevertheless, we focus our analysis on shared values, and thus on the relative fit between a person and an organization, without considering the absolute level of values in each dimension. Albeit an intensive discussion of the influence of distinctive value dimensions on control mechanisms would go beyond the scope of our paper, we integrated the model and its dimensions, in order to provide a short overview into the method section.

  2. We explicitly thank one anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christian Jung-Gehling or Erik Strauss.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Jung-Gehling and E. Strauss declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 The original scales and items used to assess the different constructs

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jung-Gehling, C., Strauss, E. A Contemporary Concept of Organizational Control: Its Dependence on Shared Values and Impact on Motivation. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 70, 341–374 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-018-0053-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-018-0053-3

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation