Skip to main content
Log in

Pricing VIX derivatives with free stochastic volatility model

  • Published:
Review of Derivatives Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to develop a new free stochastic volatility model, joint with jumps. By freeing the power parameter of instantaneous variance, this paper takes Heston model and 3/2 model for special examples, and extends the generalizability. This model is named after free stochastic volatility model, and it owns two distinctive features. First of all, the power parameter is not constrained, so as to enable the data to voice its authentic direction. The Generalized Methods of Moments suggest that the purpose of this newly-added parameter is to create various volatility fluctuations observed in financial market. Secondly, even upward and downward jumps are separately modeled to accommodate the market data, this paper still provides the quasi-closed-form solutions for futures and option prices. Consequently, the model is novel and highly tractable. Here, it should be noted that the data on VIX futures and corresponding option contracts is employed to evaluate the model, in terms of its pricing and implied volatility features capturing performance. To sum up, the free stochastic volatility model with asymmetric jumps is capable of adequately capturing the implied volatility dynamics. Thus, it can be regarded as a model advantageous in pricing VIX derivatives with fixed power volatility models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bates, D. S. (2000). Post-’87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market. Journal of Econometrics, 94(1–2), 181–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldeaux, J., & Badran, A. (2014). Consistent modelling of VIX and equity derivatives using a 3/2 plus jumps model. Applied Mathematical Finance, 21(4), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bluman, G., & Kumei, S. (1989). Symmetries and differential equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 81. New York: Springer.

  • Breeden, D. T., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1978). Prices of state-contingent claims implicit in option prices. Journal of Business, 51(4), 621–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBOE. (2003). VIX: CBOE volatility index. Available at www.cboe.com/micro/vix/vixwhite.pdf.

  • Chan, K. C., Karolyi, G. A., Longstaff, F. A., & Sanders, A. B. (1992). An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate. The Journal of Finance, 47(3), 1209–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, M., & Lennox, K. A. (2009). The calculation of expectations for classes of diffusion processes by Lie symmetry methods. The Annals of Applied Probability, 19(1), 127–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drimus, G. G. (2012). Options on realized variance by transform methods: A non-affine stochastic volatility model. Quantitative Finance, 12(11), 1679–1694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. C., & Yeh, C. Y. (2010). Jump and volatility risk premiums implied by VIX. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(11), 2232–2244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goard, J., & Mazur, M. (2013). Stochastic volatility models and the pricing of VIX options. Mathematical Finance, 23(3), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasselli, M. (2017). The 4/2 stochastic volatility model: A unified approach for the Heston and the 3/2 model. Mathematical Finance, 27(4), 1013–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunbichler, A., & Longstaff, F. A. (1996). Valuing futures and options on volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(6), 985–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50(4), 1029–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston, S. L. (1993). A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies, 6(2), 327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. L. (2000). Option valuation under stochastic volatility. Newport Beach, CA: Finance Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian, G. H., & Zhu, S. P. (2013). Pricing VIX options with stochastic volatility and random jumps. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 36(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W., Li, S. H., Luo, X. G., & Chern, S. (2017). Consistent pricing of VIX and equity derivatives with the 4/2 stochastic volatility plus jumps model. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 447(2), 778–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olver, P. J. (1993). Applications of Lie groups to differential equations, 2nd Edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 107. New York: Springer.

  • Pan, J. (2002). The jump-risk premia implicit in options: evidence from an integrated time-series study. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(1), 3–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Y. H. (2016). The Effects of asymmetric volatility and jumps on the pricing of VIX derivatives. Journal of Econometrics, 192(1), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepp, A. (2008). VIX option pricing in a jump-diffusion model. Risk Magazine, 84–89. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1412339.

  • Whitney, K. N. (1985). Generalized method of moment specification testing. Journal of Econometric, 29, 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. E., & Zhu, Y. (2006). VIX futures. Journal of Futures Markets, 26(6), 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11571310A011402) and Jin E. Zhang has been supported by an establishment grant from the University of Otago and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71771199).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Lin.

Additional information

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11171304 and 71371168) and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. Y6110023).

Appendix: Derivation of 1st and 2nd order moment of \(\varepsilon _{t+1}\)

Appendix: Derivation of 1st and 2nd order moment of \(\varepsilon _{t+1}\)

To derive \(\mathbb {E}^{\mathbb {Q}}[\varepsilon _{t+1}]\) and \(\mathbb {E}^{\mathbb {Q}}[\varepsilon _{t+1}^{2}]\), we split the Brownian motion \(W^{\mathbb {P}}\) into \(Z^{\mathbb {P}}\) and its orthogonal part \(Z^{\mathbb {P},\bot }\) and obtain

$$\begin{aligned} \varepsilon _{t+1}&=\delta _s^{*}V_{t+1}\Delta t+\gamma ^{*}V_{t+1}^{\alpha }W^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t)\\&=\delta _s^{*}V_{t+1}\Delta t +\gamma ^{*}V_{t+1}^{\alpha } \left[ \rho Z^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t)+\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}Z^{{\mathbb {P}},\bot }(\Delta t)\right] . \end{aligned}$$

Taking expectation to both sides, it follows that

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {E}_t[\varepsilon _{t+1}]&=\delta _s^{*}\mathbb {E}_t[V_{t+1}]\Delta t+\rho \gamma ^{*}\mathbb {E}_t\left[ V_{t+1}^{\alpha }Z^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t)\right] \\&\quad +\gamma ^{*}\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}\mathbb {E}\left[ V_{t+1}^{\alpha }Z^{\mathbb {P},\bot }(\Delta t)\right] \\&=\delta _s^{*}\mathbb {E}_t[V_{t+1}]\Delta t+\rho \gamma ^{*}\mathbb {E}_t\left[ V_{t+1}^{\alpha }\right] *\mathbb {E}_t\left[ Z^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t)\right] \\&\quad +\gamma ^{*}\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}\mathbb {E}\left[ V_{t+1}^{\alpha }\right] *\mathbb {E}\left[ Z^{\mathbb {P},\bot }(\Delta t)\right] \\&=\delta _s^{*}\Delta tG(\kappa ^{*}, \theta ^{*}, \sigma , -1; \Delta t, V_t). \end{aligned}$$

The second and third terms in the last equation equal 0 due to the independence and independent increments of Brownian motion. On the other hand, the second moment of \(\varepsilon _{t+1}\) is explicitly known as

$$\begin{aligned} \mathbb {E}[\varepsilon ^{2}_{t+1}]&=\mathbb {E}_t\left[ \delta _s^{*2}V_{t+1}^2\Delta t^2 +\gamma ^{*2}V_{t+1}^{2\alpha }(W^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t))^2+2\delta _s^{*}\Delta t\gamma ^{*}V_{t+1}^{\alpha +1}W^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t)\right] \\&=\delta _s^{*2}\Delta t^2\phi (\Delta t, V_t; {-}2, 0, 0, 0) {+}\mathbb {E}_t\left[ \gamma ^{*2}V_{t+1}^{2\alpha }(\rho Z^{\mathbb {P}}(\Delta t){+}\sqrt{1-\rho ^2}Z^{\mathbb {P},\bot }(\Delta t))^2\right] \\&=\delta _s^{*2}G(\kappa ^{*}, \theta ^{*}, \sigma , -2; \Delta t, V_t)\Delta t^2+\gamma ^{*2}G(\kappa ^{*}, \theta ^{*}, \sigma , -2\alpha ; \Delta t, V_t)\Delta t \end{aligned}$$

where we use Remark 2.1 by setting \(\eta \) to be different values and the fact that \(V_t\) is a Markov process.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, W., Li, S., Chern, S. et al. Pricing VIX derivatives with free stochastic volatility model. Rev Deriv Res 22, 41–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-018-9145-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11147-018-9145-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation