Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T20:21:45.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Argentine Danish Grammatical Gender: Stability with Strongly Patterned Variation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2021

Karoline Kühl Open the ORCID record for Karoline Kühl [Opens in a new window]  and
Jan Heegård Petersen Open the ORCID record for Jan Heegård Petersen [Opens in a new window]
Karoline Kühl*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar
Jan Heegård Petersen*
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
*
[kuehl.karoline@gmail.com]
Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics University of Copenhagen Emil Holms Kanal 2 2300 Copenhagen S Denmark [janhp@hum.ku.dk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the expression of grammatical gender in Heritage Argentine Danish. We examine a subset of the Corpus of South American Danish of approximately 20,500 tokens of gender marking produced by 90 speakers. The results show that Argentine Danish gender marking in general complies with the Standard Denmark Danish rules. However, there is also systematic variation: While there is hardly any difference compared to Standard Denmark Danish with respect to the definite suffix, gender marking on prenominal determiners differs from that in Standard Danish. More specifically, the less frequent neuter gender is more vulnerable, and common gender tends to be overgeneralized. Further, complex NPs with attributive adjectives show more variation in gender marking on prenominal determiners than simple NPs. As to sociolinguistic variation, the analysis shows that tokens produced by older speakers and speakers from settlements with a higher degree of language maintenance are consistent to a higher degree with Standard Danish gender marking. The paper compares these results with the results of studies of gender marking variation in other Germanic heritage languages. We conclude that the overall stability of grammatical gender in the Germanic heritage languages is a general pattern that only partly relates to social or societal factors.*

Keywords

heritage languagelanguage contactbilingualismgender markingmulti-factorial regression analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Germanic Linguistics , Volume 33 , Issue 1: Special Issue: Gender in Germanic , March 2021 , pp. 67 - 94
Check for updates
Copyright
© Society for Germanic Linguistics 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the support by A.P Møller and Hustru Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Fond til Almeene Formaal, the Carlsberg Foundation and the Faculty of Humanities at the University of Copenhagen for the research project Danish Voices in the Americas (University of Copenhagen, 2014–2018) that forms the basis of this research. Further, we express our thanks to two anonymous reviewers as well as to Leonie Cornips, who provided feedback on a previous version of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Jan, Heegård Petersen, & Karoline, Kühl. Forthcoming. De nye hjem [The new homes]. Dansk Sproghistorie [The History of the Danish Language], vol. 5, ed. by Hjorth, Ebba, Jacobsen, Birgitte, Jacobsen, Henrik Galberg, Jørgensen, Bent, & Jørgensen, Merete K.. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Bjerg, María. 1991. Generations and Danishness in the Argentine Pampas. Ethnicity, minorities and cultural encounters, ed. by Svanberg, Ingvar, 9–29. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Bjerg, María 2001: Entre Sofie y Tovelille. Una historia de los immigrantes daneses en la Argentina (1848-1930). Buenos Aires: Biblos.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2009. The life and death of Texas German. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2012. The grammar of words. An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braüner, Kappelgaard, Sofie, & Hannah, Bruun Hjorth. 2017. Det stærkeste køn. En undersøgelse af genusrealisering i dansk blandt teenagere i flersprogede miljøer i Køge og på Amager [The strongest gender. An investigation of the realization of gender in Danish among teenagers in multilingual communities in Køge and on Amager]. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Brown, Joshua, & Joshua, Bousquette. 2018. Heritage languages in North America: Sociolinguistic approaches. Journal of Language Contact 11. 201–207.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, Leonie, & Frans, Gregersen. 2017. Comparative studies of variation in the use of grammatical gender in the Danish and Dutch DP in the speech of youngsters: Free versus bound morphemes. Crosslinguistic Influence in Bilingualism 52: In honor of Aafke Hulk, ed. by Blom, Elma, Cornips, Leonie, & Schaeffer, Jeannette, 101–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy. 1978. East Sutherland Gaelic. The dialect of the Brora, Golspie, and Embo fishing communities. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans Olav. 2004. On the relation between gender and declension: A diachronic perspective from Norwegian. Studies of Language 28. 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Erik, & Lars, Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog. 2: Syntaktiske og semantiske helheder [A grammar of the Danish language. 2: Syntactic and semantic units]. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.Google Scholar
Jan, Heegård Petersen, & Karoline, Kühl. 2017. Argentinadansk: Semantiske, syntaktiske og morfologiske forskelle til rigsdansk [Argentine Danish: Semantic, syntactic and morphological differences from Standard Danish]. Nydanske Sprogstudier, NyS 52–53. 231–258.Google Scholar
Heegård, Petersen, Jan, Jacob Thøgersen, & Gert, Foget Hansen. 2019. Correlations between linguistic change and linguistic performance among heritage speakers of Danish in Argentina. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.17068.pet, February 6, 2019.Google Scholar
Heegård, Petersen, Jan, Gert, Foget Hansen, Jacob, Thøgersen, & Karoline, Kühl. 2018. Linguistic proficiency: A quantitative approach to immigrant and heritage speakers of Danish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2017-0088, December 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, & Ida, Larsson. 2015. Complexity matters: On gender agreement in Heritage Scandinavian. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01842, December 18, 2015.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi, Joel, Priestley, Kristin, Hagen, Tor Anders, Åfarli, & Øystein, Alexander Vangsnes. 2009. The Nordic dialect corpus—An advanced research tool. Proceedings of the 17th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA), ed. by Jokinen, Kristiina & Bick, Eckhard, 73–80. Available at http://tekstlab.uio.no/nota/scandiasyn/.Google Scholar
Kühl, Karoline, Jan, Heegård Petersen, & Gert, Foget Hansen. 2019. The Corpus of American Danish: A language resource of spoken immigrant Danish in North and South America. Language Resources and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-019-09473-5, August 23, 2019. (2020. Language Resources and Evaluation 54. 831–849).Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje, & Marit, Westergaard. 2016. Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: Stability or attrition? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00344, March 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter. 1974 [1991]. Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montrul, Silvina. 2013. Bilingualism and the heritage language speaker. Handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism, ed. by Tej, K. Bhatia & William, C. Ritchie, 168–189. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1988. Pidgin and creole languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. 2001. Language contact. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar