Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate entrepreneurship, its antecedents, process, and consequences: A systematic review and suggestion for future research

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) has been drawing mounting interest in recent decades. Entrepreneurial behavior holds paramount importance in organizational research, since entrepreneurship is essential for modern organizations success. Each scholarly has partly investigated the concept. This paper seeks to present the result of a systematic review of the prominent studies about CE while elaborating on fundamental concepts. To do so, we have conducted statistical analyses of significant 336 studies while categorizing CE literature on a thematic basis. The analyses suggest that CE literature may fall in three main categories, i.e., antecedent, process, and consequence. The paper proceeds to further delve into these categories while examining key studies of each to delineate pivotal concepts. In the second part of the paper, we try to describe historical trends and the research methodology employed in CE studies. Thus, the current paper is expected to illustrate a representative picture of CE research directions and fundamental concepts. As some researchers have pointed to the close relationship between International Entrepreneurship (IE) and CE, IE has been specifically addressed in this survey.

Résumé

L’entrepreneuriat corporatif (EC) a suscité un intérêt croissant au cours des dernières décennies. Le comportement entrepreneurial est important dans les études sur les organisations, car l’esprit d’entreprise est essentiel dans la réussite des organisations modernes. Chaque article scientifique dans ce domaine en partie a étudié le concept. Cet article présente une synthèse des études principales sur l’EC et développe des concepts fondamentaux.

Nous avons mené des analyses statistiques de 336 études significatives, catégorisant la littérature EC sur une base thématique. Les analyses suggèrent que la littérature EC peut se diviser en trois catégories principales, à savoir l’antécédent, le processus et les conséquences. L’article examine les études clés de chaque catégorie pour délimiter les concepts pivots.

Dans la deuxième partie de l’article, nous décrivons les tendances historiques et les méthodologies de recherche employées dans les études d'EC. Ainsi, le présent article illustre une image représentative des orientations de recherche et des concepts fondamentaux de l’EC.

Certains chercheurs ont souligné la relation étroite entre l’entrepreneuriat international (EI) et EC. C’est pour cette raison que nous avons abordée plus spécifiquement la question de l’EI dans cette enquête.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • *Altinay L, Madanoglu M, De Vita G, Arasli H, Ekinci Y (2016) The interface between organizational learning capability, entrepreneurial orientation, and SME growth. J Small Bus Manag 54(3):871-891.

  • Amit RH, Brigham K, Markman GD (2000) Entrepreneurial management as strategy. In: Meyer GD, Heppard KA (eds) Entrepreneurship as strategy: competing on the entrepreneurial edge. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 83–89

  • *Antoncic B, Hisrich RD, (2001) Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. J Bus Ventur 16(5):495-527.

  • Baruah B, Ward A (2015) Metamorphosis of intrapreneurship as an effective organizational strategy. Int Entrep Manag J 11(4):811–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Basu S, Phelps CC, Kotha S (2016) Search and integration in external venturing: an inductive examination of corporate venture capital units. Strateg Entrep J 10(2):129–152.

  • *Behrens J, Patzelt H (2016) Corporate entrepreneurship managers’ project terminations: integrating portfolio-level, individual-level, and firm-level effects. entrepreneurship theory and practice 40(4):815-842.

  • Bertoni F, Colombo MG, Quas A (2015) The patterns of venture capital investment in Europe. Small Bus Econ 45(3):543–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bierwerth M, Schwens C, Isidor R, Kabst R (2015) Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: a meta-analysis. Small Bus Econ 45(2):255-278.

  • *Boling JR, Pieper TM, Covin JG (2016) CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 40(4):891-913.

  • Burgelman RA (1984) Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms. Calif Manag Rev 26(3):154–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett A, Covin JG, O'Connor GC, Tucci CL (2013) Corporate entrepreneurship: State-of-the-art research and a future research agenda. J Prod Innov Manag 30(5):812–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Courpasson D, Dany F, Martí I (2016) Organizational entrepreneurship as active resistance: a struggle against outsourcing. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 40(1):131-160.

  • *Covin JG, Miles MP (1999) Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 23(3):47–64.

  • *Covin JG, Miller D (2014) International entrepreneurial orientation: conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 38(1):11-44.

  • *Covin JG, Wales WJ (2012) The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 36(4):677-702.

  • Creswell JW (2013) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications

  • *Dada O, Watson A, Kirby DA (2012) Toward a model of franchisee entrepreneurship. Int Small Bus J 30(5):559-583.

  • *De Clercq D, Dimov D, Belausteguigoitia I (2016) Perceptions of adverse work conditions and innovative behavior: the buffering roles of relational resources. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 40(3):515-542.

  • *Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, McGee JE (1999) Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 23(3):85–102.

  • *Dheer RJ, Lenartowicz T (2018) Multiculturalism and entrepreneurial intentions: Understanding the mediating role of cognitions. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 42(3):426-466.

  • Díaz-Casero JC, Ferreira JJM, Mogollón RH, Raposo MLB (2012) Influence of institutional environment on entrepreneurial intention: a comparative study of two countries university students. Int Entrep Manag J 8(1):55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos P, Johnson JE, Plakoyiannaki E, Young S (2016) SME internationalization: how does the opportunity-based international entrepreneurial culture matter? Int Bus Rev 25(6):1211–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Douglas EJ, Fitzsimmons JR (2013) Intrapreneurial intentions versus entrepreneurial intentions: distinct constructs with different antecedents. Small Bus Econ 41(1):115-132.

  • Dushnitsky G, Lenox MJ (2006) When does corporate venture capital investment create firm value? J Bus Ventur 21(6):753–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Brown SL, Neck HM (2000) Competing on the entrepreneurial edge. In: Meyer GD, Heppard KA (eds) Entrepreneurship as strategy. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 49–62

  • Etemad H (2004) International entrepreneurship as a dynamic adaptive system: towards a grounded theory. J Int Entrep 2(1-2):5–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H (2017) Towards a conceptual multilayered framework of international entrepreneurship. J Int Entrep 15(3):229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle A, Basso O, Bouchard V (2010) Three levels of culture and firms’ entrepreneurial orientation: A research agenda. Entrepreneur Region Develop 22(7-8):707–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes CI, Ferreira JJ, Raposo ML (2013) Drivers to firm innovation and their effects on performance: an international comparison. Int Entrep Manag J 9(4):557–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Foo MD (2011) Emotions and entrepreneurial opportunity evaluation. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 35(2):375-393.

  • Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA (2013) The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strateg Manag J 34(12):1453–1471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ, Lyngsie J, Zahra SA (2015) Organizational design correlates of entrepreneurship: The roles of decentralization and formalization for opportunity discovery and realization. Strateg Organ 13(1):32–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Garrett RP, Holland DV (2015) Environmental effects on the cognitions of corporate and independent entrepreneurs. Small Bus Econ 45(2):369-381.

  • Gast J, Werner A, Kraus S (2017) Antecedents of the small firm effect: the role of knowledge spillover and blocked mobility for employee entrepreneurial intentions. Int Entrep Manag J 13(1):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary J, Marriott L, Rowlinson M (2004) Journal rankings in business and management and the 2001 research assessment exercise in the UK. Br J Manag 15(2):95–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guth WD, Ginsberg A (1990) Guest editors’ introduction: corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal 5–15.

  • *Haynie JM, Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2010) Cognitive adaptability and an entrepreneurial task: the role of metacognitive ability and feedback. Enterp Theory Pract 36(2):237–265.

  • Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Holt DT, Wales WJ (2013) Assessing a measurement of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship. J Prod Innov Manag 30(5):937–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Zahra SA (2002) Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. J Bus Ventur 17(3):49–63.

  • *Hughes M, Mustafa M (2017) Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship in SMEs: evidence from an emerging economy. J Small Bus Manag 55(S1):115-140.

  • *Ireland RD, Covin JG, Kuratko DF (2009) Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 33(1):19-46.

  • Ireland RD, Kuratko DF, Morris MH (2006) A health audit for corporate entrepreneurship: innovation at all levels: part I. J Bus Strateg 27(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Z (2011) Global technological change: from hard technology to soft technology. Intellect Books

  • Jones MV, Coviello N, Tang YK (2011) International entrepreneurship research (1989-2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. J Bus Ventur 26:632–659

  • *Kang JH, Matusik JG, Kim TY, Phillips JM (2016) Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behavior in entrepreneurial firms: a cross-level investigation. J Bus Ventur 31(6):628-642.

  • *Keh HT, Der Foo M, Lim BC (2002) Opportunity evaluation under risky conditions: the cognitive processes of entrepreneurs. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 27(2):125-148.

  • *Keil T, Maula M, Syrigos E (2017) CEO entrepreneurial orientation, entrenchment, and firm value creation. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 41(4):475-504.

  • Khalil T (2001) Future direction and needs in the management of technology. In: Management of technology: the key to prosperity to the third millennium. Elsevier Science Ltd/Pergamon Press, Amsterdam/Oxford

  • *Knight GA (1997) Cross-cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. J Bus Ventur 12(3):213–225.

  • *Knudsen ES, Lien LB (2015) Hire, fire, or train: innovation and human capital responses to recessions. Strateg Entrep J 9(4):313-330.

  • *Kreiser PM, Marino LD, Kuratko DF, Weaver KM (2013) Disaggregating entrepreneurial orientation: the non-linear impact of innovativeness, proactiveness and risk-taking on SME performance. Small Bus Econ 40(2):273-291.

  • Kuckertz A, Kollmann T, Krell P, Stöckmann C (2017) Understanding, differentiating, and measuring opportunity recognition and opportunity exploitation. Int J Entrep Behav Res 23(1):78–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF (2010) Corporate entrepreneurship: An introduction and research review. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Springer, New York, NY

  • Kuratko DF (2016) Entrepreneurship: theory, process, and practice. Cengage Learning

  • *Kuratko DF, Audretsch DB (2009) Strategic entrepreneurship: exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 33(1):1–17.

  • Kuratko DF, Audretsch DB (2013) Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 9(3):323–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, Covin JG (2014) Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horiz 57(1):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, Hayton J (2015) Corporate entrepreneurship: the innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Bus Econ 45(2):245-253.

  • Kuratko DF, Ireland RD, Hornsby JS (2001) The power of entrepreneurial outcomes: Insights from Acordia, Inc. Acad Manag Exec 15(4):60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko DF, Montagno RV, Hornsby JS (1990) Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strateg Manag J:49–58

  • *Kuratko DF, Ireland RD, Covin JG, Hornsby JS (2005) A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 29(6):699–716.

  • *Lanza A, Passarelli M (2014) Technology change and dynamic entrepreneurial capabilities. J Small Bus Manag 52(3):427-450.

  • *Lichtenthaler U (2012) Technological Turbulence and the Impact of Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations on Product Development Performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

  • Lockett A, Wright M, Burrows A, Scholes L, Paton D (2008) The export intensity of venture capital backed companies. Small Bus Econ 31(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lumpkin GT, Cogliser CC, Schneider DR (2009) Understanding and Measuring Autonomy: an entrepreneurial orientation perspective. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 33(1):47–69.

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ma R, Huang YC (2016) Opportunity-based strategic orientation, knowledge acquisition, and entrepreneurial alertness: the perspective of the global sourcing suppliers in China. J Small Bus Manag 54(3):953-972.

  • Mainela T, Puhakka V, Servais P (2014) The concept of international opportunity in international entrepreneurship: a review and a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 16(1):105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Román JA, Romero I (2013) About the determinants of the degree of novelty in small businesses’ product innovations. Int Entrep Manag J 9(4):655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *McDougall-Covin P, Jones MV, Serapio MG (2014) High-potential concepts, phenomena, and theories for the advancement of international entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 38(1):1-10.

  • *McDougall PP (1989) International versus domestic entrepreneurship: new venture strategic behavior and industry structure. J Bus Ventur 4(6):387-400.

  • Morris H, Harvey C, Kelly A (2009) Journal rankings and the ABS journal quality guide. Manag Decis 47(9):1441–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MH, Kuratko DF, Covin JC (2010) Corporate entrepreneurship and innovation. South-Western/Thomson Publishers

  • Muzychenko O (2008) Cross-cultural entrepreneurial competence in identifying international business opportunities. Eur Manag J 26(6):366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Naldi L, Achtenhagen L, Davidsson P (2015) International corporate entrepreneurship among SME s: a test of S tevenson’s notion of entrepreneurial management. J Small Bus Manag 53(3):780-800.

  • *Nasra R, Dacin MT (2010) Institutional arrangements and international entrepreneurship: the state as institutional entrepreneur. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 34(3):583-609.

  • Nissan E, Galindo MA, Picazo MTM (2012) Innovation, progress, entrepreneurship and cultural aspects. Int Entrep Manag J 8(4):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1994) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 29(5):537-553.

  • *Parrish BD (2010) Sustainability-driven entrepreneurship: principles of organization design. J Bus Ventur 25(5):510-523.

  • *Pearce JA, Kramer TR, Robbins DK (1997) Effects of managers’ entrepreneurial behavior on subordinates. J Bus Ventur 12(2):147–160.

  • Peris-Ortiz M (2009) An analytical model for human resource management as an enabler of organizational renewal: a framework for corporate entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J 5(4):461–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchott G (1985) Intrapreneurship. Harper and Row, New York

  • *Pinkse J, Groot K (2015) Sustainable entrepreneurship and corporate political activity: overcoming market barriers in the clean energy sector. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 39(3):633-654.

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Renko M, El Tarabishy A, Carsrud AL, Brännback M (2015) Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. J Small Bus Manag 53(1):54-74.

  • *Rosa P (2007) Book review: corporate entrepreneurship and growth. Int Small Bus J 25(1):102-103.

  • *Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J, Bausch A (2011) Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. J Bus Ventur 26(4):441-457.

  • Rosenbusch N, Brinckmann J, Müller V (2013) Does acquiring venture capital pay off for the funded firms? A meta-analysis on the relationship between venture capital investment and funded firm financial performance. J Bus Ventur 28(3):335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakhdari K (2016) Corporate entrepreneurship: A review and future research agenda. Technol Innov Manag Rev 6(8):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samei H, Feyzbakhsh A (2015a) A framework of successor competencies to promote corporate entrepreneurship in family firms. J Enterpris Cult 23(3):321–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samei H, Feyzbakhsh A (2015b) Predecessors competency framework for nurturing successors in family firms. Int J Entrep Behav Res 21(5):731–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathe V (1989) Fostering entrepreneurship in large diversified firm. Organ Dyn 18(1):20–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathe V (2003) Corporate entrepreneurship, top managers and new business creation. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Siegel R, Siegel E, MacMillan IC (1988) Corporate venture capitalists: autonomy, obstacles, and performance. J Bus Ventur 3(3):233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev 25(1):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • *Sharma P, Chrisman JJ (1999) Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 23(3):11–28.

  • *Shepherd DA, Patzelt H (2011) The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 35(1):137-163.

  • *Slevin DP, Terjesen SA (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation: reviewing three papers and implications for further theoretical and methodological development. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 35(5):973–987.

  • *Strese S, Keller M, Flatten TC, Brettel M (2016) CEOs’ passion for inventing and radical innovations in SMEs: the moderating effect of shared vision. J Small Bus Manag

  • Styles C, Seymour RG (2006) Opportunities for marketing researchers in international entrepreneurship. Int Mark Rev 23(2):126–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tang J, Kacmar KM, Busenitz L (2012) Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. J Bus Ventur 27(1):77-94.

  • Thanos IC, Dimitratos P, Sapouna P (2017) The implications of international entrepreneurial orientation, politicization, and hostility upon SME international performance. Int Small Bus J 35(4):495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Tiessen JH (1997) Individualism, collectivism, and entrepreneurship: a framework for international comparative research. J Bus Ventur 12(5):367-384.

  • Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P (2003) Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br J Manag 14(3):207–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai KH, Yang SY (2014) The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. Int Entrep Manag J 10(2):343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Vozikis GS, Bruton GD, Prasad D, Merikas AA (1999) Linking corporate entrepreneurship to financial theory through additional value creation. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 24(2):33-44.

  • Wadhwa A, Kotha S (2006) Knowledge creation through external venturing: evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Acad Manag J 49(4):819–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa A, Phelps C, Kotha S (2016) Corporate venture capital portfolios and firm innovation. J Bus Ventur 31(1):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakkee I, Elfring T, Monaghan S (2010) Creating entrepreneurial employees in traditional service sectors. Int Entrep Manag J 6(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Wales WJ, Gupta VK, Mousa FT (2013) Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: an assessment and suggestions for future research. Int Small Bus J 31(4):357–383.

  • Wang CL (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 32(4):635–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Welpe IM, Spörrle M, Grichnik D, Michl T, Audretsch DB (2012) Emotions and opportunities: the interplay of opportunity evaluation, fear, joy, and anger as antecedent of entrepreneurial exploitation. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 36(1):69-96.

  • Wincent J, Thorgren S, Anokhin S (2016) Costly ties: social capital as a retardant of network-level entrepreneurial orientation. J Small Bus Manag 54(1):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withers MC, Drnevich PL, Marino L (2011) Doing more with less: the disordinal implications of firm age for leveraging capabilities for innovation activity. J Small Bus Manag 49(4):515–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff JA, Pett TL, Ring JK (2015) Small firm growth as a function of both learning orientation and entrepreneurial orientation: an empirical analysis. Int J Entrep Behav Res 21(5):709–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Zahra SA (1991) Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 6(4):259–286.

  • *Zahra SA (1993) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm-level behavior: a critique and extension. Entrepreneur Theory Pract 17(4):5-21.

  • *Zahra SA, Covin J (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur 10(1):43-58.

  • *Zahra SA, Kuratko DF, Jennings DF (1999) Guest editorial: corporate entrepreneurship and wealth creation: contemporary and emerging perspectives. Enterp Theory Pract 24(2):5-5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Teimori Blvd., Habibolahi Ave., Azadi St., P.O. Box 1155/8639, Tehran, 1459973941, Iran

    Homa Pirhadi & Alireza Feyzbakhsh

Authors
  1. Homa Pirhadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alireza Feyzbakhsh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Homa Pirhadi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirhadi, H., Feyzbakhsh, A. Corporate entrepreneurship, its antecedents, process, and consequences: A systematic review and suggestion for future research. J Int Entrep 19, 196–222 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00294-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00294-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation