skip to main content
editorial
Free Access

Workshop on Overcoming Measurement Barriers to Internet Research (WOMBIR 2021) final report

Published:23 July 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In January and April 2021 we held the Workshop on Overcoming Measurement Barriers to Internet Research (WOMBIR) with the goal of understanding challenges in network and security data set collection and sharing. Most workshop attendees provided white papers describing their perspectives, and many participated in short-talks and discussion in two virtual workshops over five days. That discussion produced consensus around several points. First, many aspects of the Internet are characterized by decreasing visibility of important network properties, which is in tension with the Internet's role as critical infrastructure. We discussed three specific research areas that illustrate this tension: security, Internet access; and mobile networking. We discussed visibility challenges at all layers of the networking stack, and the challenge of gathering data and validating inferences. Important data sets require longitudinal (long-term, ongoing) data collection and sharing, support for which is more challenging for Internet research than other fields. We discussed why a combination of technical and policy methods are necessary to safeguard privacy when using or sharing measurement data. Workshop participant proposed several opportunities to accelerate progress, some of which require coordination across government, industry, and academia.

References

  1. M. Martonosi, "Request for Information on the specific needs for datasets to conduct research on computer and network systems." NSF Dear Colleague Letter 21-056, at https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21056/nsf21056.jsp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. "NSF-sponsored Workshop on Overcoming Measurement Barriers to Internet Research (WOMBIR 2021) -- Parts I and II," 2021. https://www.caida.org/workshops/wombir/2101/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. "Cyberspace Solarium Commission report," 2020. https://www.solarium.gov/report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. "A National Cybersecurity Agenda for Resilient Digital Infrastructure," The Aspen Institute, 2020. https://www.aspeninstitute.org/longform/a-national-cybersecurity-agenda-for-resilient-digital-infrastructure/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. National Academy of Sciences, "Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency, Edition 7." https://www.nap.edu/resource/25885/P&P%207%20Higlights.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. "Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 706(a): Advanced Telecommunications Incentives." (codified as 47 U.S.C. 1302).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), "Broadband Data Resources in data.gov," 2021. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset?q=broadband.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zachary S. Bischof and Fabián E. Bustamante and Rade Stanojevic, "Need, Want, Can Afford Broadband Markets and the Behavior of Users," in Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. P. Rula, Z. S. Bischof, and F. E. Bustamante, "Second chance: Understanding diversity in broadband access network performance," in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Crowdsourcing and Crowdsharing of Big (Internet) Data, C2B(1)D '15, (New York, NY, USA), p. 914, Association for Computing Machinery, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z. Bischof, F. Bustamante, and R. Stanojevic, "The utility argument making a case for broadband slas," in Passive and Active Measurement - 18th International Conference, PAM 2017, Proceedings (S. Uhlig, J. Amann, and M. Kaafar, eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pp. 156--169, Springer Verlag, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Y. Li, C. Peng, Z. Yuan, J. Li, H. Deng, and T. Wang, "MobileInsight: Extracting and Analyzing Cellular Network Information on Smartphones." http://www.mobileinsight.net, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kenneally, Erin and Dittrich, David, "The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research," 2012. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2445102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dittrich, David and Kenneally, Erin and Bailey, Michael, "Applying Ethical Principles to Information and Communication Technology Research: A Companion to the Menlo Report," 2013. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2342036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith, "Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis," in Theory of Cryptography (S. Halevi and T. Rabin, eds.), 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. C. Staff, "Differential privacy: The pursuit of protections by default," Commun. ACM, vol. 64, Jan. 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Evans, V. Kolesnikov, and M. Rosulek, "A pragmatic introduction to secure multi-party computation," Foundations and Trends in Privacy and Security, vol. 2, 2018. free version at http://securecomputation.org/.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Y. Lindell, "Secure multiparty computation," Comm. ACM, Dec. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Francis, S. Eide, and R. Munz, "Diffix: High-utility database anonymization," in Annual Privacy Forum, pp. 141--158, 06 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Corrigan-Gibbs and D. Boneh, "Prio: Private, robust, and scalable computation of aggregate statistics," in USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI'17, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, and K. Finch, "Shades of gray: Seeing the full spectrum of practical data de-identification," Santa Clara Law Review, p. 593628, 2016. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol56/iss3/3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. "CAIDA Data Stewardship Agreements," 2020. https://www.caida.org/about/legal/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. kc claffy and David Clark, "Comments on the American Research Environment," 2021. in response to Request for Information from the National Science and Technology Council, https://www.caida.org/catalog/papers/2020_comments_rfi_american_research/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. University Industry Demonstration Partnership, "Uidp website." https://uidp.org/, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. NSF, NTIA, and FCC, "Memorandum of agreement between the NSF, the NTIA and the FCC regarding the Spectrum Innovation Initiative." https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/blogimages/sii_moa_fcc_nsf_ntia.pdf, Jan. 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. FCC, "Electronic comment filing system." https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. FCC. https://www.fcc.gov/proceedings-actions/daily-digest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. NFS and FCC, "NSF-FCC workshop on tracking quality of experience in the Internet." Workshop website http://aqualab.cs.northwestern.edu/conference/276, Oct. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Workshop on Overcoming Measurement Barriers to Internet Research (WOMBIR 2021) final report

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 51, Issue 3
          July 2021
          45 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/3477482
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 July 2021

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • editorial

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader