Elsevier

Earth-Science Reviews

Volume 220, September 2021, 103753
Earth-Science Reviews

Sulfur aerosols in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau: Current knowledge and future perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103753Get rights and content

Abstract

Sulfur aerosols, mainly composed of sulfate and methanesulfonic acid (MSA), significantly affect the Earth’s radiation balance, biogeochemical cycles and ecosystems, especially in the polar regions with vulnerable environments. To better understand the relationship between anthropogenic activities and climate change, a comprehensive review is presented, covering sulfate and MSA concentrations and isotope composition from 18 sites in the Arctic, 22 sites in the Antarctic and 25 sites in the Tibetan Plateau. The spatio-temporal variability of sulfur aerosols and the potential factors controlling their concentrations are summarized, sulfur isotopes are used to identify the importance of anthropogenic vs. natural inputs, and ice cores are employed to reconstruct the paleo-evolution of atmospheric sulfates. Finally, this review discusses the need for future research on organosulfur aerosols, the mixing state of sulfur aerosols, their deposition fluxes and velocities, potential emissions by biomass burning, and the anticipated trends in sulfur aerosol concentrations in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tibetan Plateau.

Introduction

Climate change is a critical issue globally, as stated by the key findings of the IPCC Special Report that highlights its impacts on natural and human systems (IPCC, 2018). Aerosols represent one of the greatest sources of uncertainty in climate modelling (Tomasi et al., 2015). Aerosols are solid or liquid particles suspended in the atmosphere. Their composition is complex, with key aerosol groups including sulfates, organic carbon, black carbon (i.e. elemental carbon), nitrates, mineral dust and sea salt. While most aerosols contribute to warming, sulfate aerosols have a net cooling effect (Charlson et al., 1992) and strongly change radiative forcing (−0.81 Wm−2 to −0.55 Wm−2) (Penner et al., 1998). Sulfates account for 11 to 59% of sub-micrometer aerosols at multiple surface locations in the Northern Hemisphere (Jimenez et al., 2009).

Sulfur-containing aerosols can be divided into inorganic sulfate (sea-salt sulfate (ss-sulfate) and non-sea-salt sulfate (nss-sulfate)) and organosulfur compounds (MSA, organosulfates and others). Sulfur-containing aerosols, whether natural or anthropogenic, originate from primary or secondary emissions of gaseous precursors and particulate matter (Fig. 1). Ss-sulfate is introduced into the atmosphere as a primary particle, but nss-sulfate and most of the organosulfur compounds are predominantly formed by secondary aerosol processes (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016). A majority of organosulfur compounds are attributed to biogenic origins (Stone et al., 2012) and MSA can serve as a tracer of atmospheric biogenic sulfur (Yli-Tuomi et al., 2003). Sulfate and MSA, the main components of sulfur-oxidized compounds, have been widely studied recently (Table 1).

Numerous gaseous sulfur compounds can be oxidized into sulfate in the atmosphere (Fig. 1), including hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon disulfide (CS2), carbonyl sulfide (COS), methyl mercaptan (CH3SH), dimethyl sulfide (CH3SCH3), dimethyl disulfide (CH3SSCH3) (Likens et al., 2002) and sulfur dioxide (SO2). For example, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), emitted by phytoplankton activity from the global ocean (Mulvaney et al., 1992), can be oxidized into SO42- and MSA aerosols (Li and Barrie, 1993; Mahmood et al., 2019; Mungall et al., 2017) and consequently plays an important role in the global biogeochemistry of sulfur (Simó, 2001). Globally, the largest sources of sulfate are estimated to come from anthropogenic emissions (122Tg/a), but the sulfate budget is also influenced by biogenic (57 Tg/a) and volcanic (21 Tg/a) inputs (Andreae and Rosenfeld, 2008).

Sulfur aerosols impact global and regional climates, ecosystems, and human health (Smith et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2016). Sulfur-containing aerosols significantly affect the Earth’s radiation balance, both directly through solar radiation scattering and indirectly by modifying cloud properties (Charlson et al., 1987; Zhao and Garrett, 2015) (Fig. 1). Modeling studies estimated that the fraction of in-cloud sulfate production increased by 2% since 1985 due to anthropogenic emissions, leading to a mean global cooling of about 0.1 K (Tsai et al., 2010). Recent reductions in anthropogenic sulfate loading in the Arctic have contributed to a net warming of the Arctic surface of +0.27 ± 0.04 K during 1980–2010 (Breider et al., 2017). Organosulfur components also play a potentially important role in altering aerosol properties by nucleophilic substitution reactions (Darer et al., 2011) and radical-radical mechanisms (Perri et al., 2010). Deposition of sulfate, the main acid component of aerosols (Weber et al., 2016), could also amplify soil and aquatic acidification (McDonnell et al., 2014), causing harmful effects on ecosystems. Atmospheric inputs of acidic byproducts from the dissociation of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) take part in biogeochemical reactions (Doney et al., 2007). Moreover, when inhaled, these particles can be taken-up by cells in the lungs, the circulatory system and organs (Kennedy, 2007) and cause adverse human health effects (McDonald et al., 2010).

Anthropogenic emission sources are extremely low in Antarctica and such environment can be considered areas where we can still find preindustrial-like conditions (Schmale, 2017), conversely mankind is having a profound impact on the fragile Arctic environment (Barbante et al., 2017). The atmosphere in the Arctic and Antarctic regions has generally been considered the cleanest on the planet (Legrand and Mayewski, 1997). The Tibetan Plateau, also referred to as the third pole (Qiu, 2008) with a mean elevation of 4.5 km a.s.l., is another important cryosphere region in the low-to-middle latitude region. These three areas are located far away from populated/industrial areas and represent particularly vulnerable environments (Kang et al., 2007; Lange et al., 2018; McClintock et al., 2008). These regions are most sensitive to climate change, are warming faster than other regions in the world (Immerzeel et al., 2010; Levasseur, 2013; McClintock et al., 2008), and are crucial areas that are undergoing unprecedented changes in their climate and environment (Li et al., 2020). The recent IPCC Special Report reaffirms that Arctic warming is two to three times higher than the global average (IPCC, 2018). Global warming has the potential to rapidly affect terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems with widespread impacts in the Arctic (Post et al., 2009), and leads to unprecedented ecological shifts in the Antarctic Peninsula (McClintock et al., 2008). The role of polar regions has a strong representation on effects of regional and transported emissions abundance (Petäjä et al., 2020).

This review discusses the achieved progress on sulfur aerosols research in recent years, using observational data from various geographical sites and ambient conditions in the Arctic, Antarctic, and the Tibetan Plateau. A systematic evaluation of sulfur aerosols in such unique areas improves our knowledge about their sources and transport mechanisms. By synthesizing the spatio-temporal variability of their abundances and chemical and isotopic compositions, this work also provides a comprehensive dataset for evaluating the role of sulfur aerosols on climate in the future. Furthermore, this study will help policy-makers to better design and implement effective regulatory and remediation strategies in the near future.

Section snippets

Data source and materials

This study summarizes the sulfate and MSA characteristics measured in the atmosphere and in ice/snow cores from the Arctic, Antarctic and the Tibetan Plateau (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4). We gathered data reported in studies from the past three decades and selected multi-year average concentrations, when possible, to better represent the spatial distribution in these areas. While we do acknowledge that the sulfate and MSA data from all study regions cover different time periods due to the limited

Spatial variations

The spatial distributions of SO42- and nssSO42- within the Arctic, Antarctic and Tibetan Plateau regions are presented in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, respectively.

In the Arctic, sites with higher SO42- concentrations (e.g. Kevo> VRS>Ny Ålesund) are located closer to the mid-latitude Eurasian anthropogenic SO2 emission sources (Fig. 2). At Kevo, the average nssSO42- concentration (1310 ± 1.94 ng m−3) is comparable to the SO42- concentration (1319 ± 2.18 ng m-3), based on data covering the 1964–1978 (

MSA concentrations and their controlling factors

MSA concentrations in Antarctica are higher than in the Arctic (Table 1), which may be explained by greater marine biogenic activity in the Southern Ocean. MSA concentrations are lower than those of SO42- in both the Arctic and Antarctic, and also display spatial variability (Fig. 2, Fig. 3).

In the Arctic, MSA concentrations are higher at the Sevettijӓrvі and Ny Ålesund stations, near the North Atlantic, in contrast to lower MSA concentrations at Barrow, Thule and Alert. Spatial variability is

Sulfur isotope characteristics

Sulfur has multiple valence states (S−2 to S+6) that are involved in a large range of photochemical, geochemical and biochemical processes. Sulfur has four stable isotopes, 32S, 33S, 34S, and 36S, whose natural abundances are approximately 95%, 0.75%, 4.2% and 0.015%, respectively (Ding et al., 2001), that have demonstrated their added value for tracing chemical reactions at the molecular level (Shaheen et al., 2014). Sulfur multiple mass-dependent (δ33S, δ34S, and δ36S) isotope compositions

Sulfate and MSA historical records

Sulfate aerosols have been monitored continuously for the longest period in the Arctic: since 1964 at Kevo (Laing et al., 2013), Alert (Sirois and Barrie, 1999), and Barrow (Quinn et al., 2009). All three sites show a drastic decline in concentrations in the early 1990s. This marked decrease since 1991 suggests that the industrial collapse in the early years of the new Eurasian republics also impacted the Arctic (Gong et al., 2010; Laing et al., 2013; Quinn et al., 2009). As mentioned, the SO42-

Summary and perspectives

Numerous studies focusing on SO42- and MSA have been conducted over the last few decades. Results revealed tempo-spatial variations of sulfur-containing aerosols in the Arctic, Antarctic and the Tibetan Plateau. Concentrations of SO42- and nssSO42- aerosols in the Arctic and Antarctic have a strong seasonal signal, with highest concentrations during the boreal winter/spring and the lowest concentrations during the boreal summer/fall, caused by differences in corresponding dominating sources. In

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported in part by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDA19070202 and XDA20040501), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 41877315 and 91837204) We thank the Kathmandu Center for Research and Education, CAS-TU for the support. Lastly, we thank the four anonymous reviewers and editor valuable and constructive comments.

References (226)

  • C.M. Carrico et al.

    The importance of carbon and mineral dust to seasonal aerosol properties in the Nepal Himalaya

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2003)
  • E. Castellano et al.

    Volcanic eruption frequency over the last 45 ky as recorded in Epica-Dome C ice core (East Antarctica) and its relationship with climatic changes

    Glob. Planet. Chang.

    (2004)
  • T. Ding et al.

    Calibrated sulfur isotope abundance ratios of three IAEA sulfur isotope reference materials and V-CDT with a reassessment of the atomic weight of sulfur

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2001)
  • J. Farquhar et al.

    Implications of conservation of mass effects on mass-dependent isotope fractionations: influence of network structure on sulfur isotope phase space of dissimilatory sulfate reduction

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • N.Z. Heidam et al.

    Arctic atmospheric contaminants in NE Greenland: levels, variations, origins, transport, transformations and trends 1990-2001

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2004)
  • S. Kang et al.

    Glaciochemical records from a Mt. Everest ice core: relationship to atmospheric circulation over Asia

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2002)
  • S.C. Kang et al.

    Variability of atmospheric dust loading over the central Tibetan Plateau based on ice core glaciochemistry

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2010)
  • J.-H. Kang et al.

    Mineral dust and major ion concentrations in snowpit samples from the NEEM site, Greenland

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2015)
  • P. Kaufmann et al.

    Ammonium and non-sea salt sulfate in the EPICA ice cores as indicator of biological activity in the Southern Ocean

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (2010)
  • I.M. Kennedy

    The health effects of combustion-generated aerosols

    Proc. Combust. Inst.

    (2007)
  • T.V. Khodzher et al.

    Chemistry of snow and ice cores along the ice flow lines at Lake Vostok (Antarctica)

    Geochemistry

    (2020)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    Multiple oxygen (16O, 17O and 18O) and sulfur (32S, 33S, 34S and 36S) isotope signatures of the dissolved sulfate from Deception Island, Antarctic Peninsula: implications on sulfate formation, transportation and deposition in the Antarctic region

    Chem. Geol.

    (2017)
  • R.M. Koerner et al.

    A 100 year record of ion chemistry from Aggassiz Ice Cap Northern Ellesmere Island NWT, Canada

    Atmos. Environ.

    (1999)
  • E.V. Korotkikh et al.

    The last interglacial as represented in the glaciochemical record from Mount Moulton Blue Ice Area, West Antarctica

    Quat. Sci. Rev.

    (2011)
  • R. Lange et al.

    Characterization of distinct Arctic aerosol accumulation modes and their sources

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2018)
  • C.L. Lee et al.

    Anthropogenic contributions to global carbonyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and organosulfides fluxes

    Earth Sci. Rev.

    (2016)
  • J.P.D. Abbatt et al.

    Overview paper: New insights into aerosol and climate in the Arctic

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2019)
  • B. Alexander et al.

    East Antarctic ice core sulfur isotope measurements over a complete glacial-interglacial cycle

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2003)
  • B. Alexander et al.

    Transition metal-catalyzed oxidation of atmospheric sulfur: global implications for the sulfur budget

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2009)
  • R. Arimoto et al.

    Non-sea salt sulfate and other aerosol constituents at the South Pole during ISCAT

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (2001)
  • D. Au Yang et al.

    Seasonality in the Δ33S measured in urban aerosols highlights an additional oxidation pathway for atmospheric SO2

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2019)
  • M. Baroni et al.

    Anomalous sulfur isotope compositions of volcanic sulfate over the last millennium in Antarctic ice cores

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2008)
  • S. Becagli et al.

    Spatial distribution of biogenic sulphur compounds (MSA, nssSO42–) in the northern Victoria Land–Dome C–Wilkes Land area, East Antarctica

    Ann. Glaciol.

    (2005)
  • S. Becagli et al.

    Biogenic aerosol in the Artic from eight years of MSA data from Ny Ålesund (Svalbard Islands) and Thule (Greenland)

    Atmosphere

    (2019)
  • S. Benassai et al.

    Sea-spray deposition in Antarctic coastal and plateau areas from ITASE traverses

    Ann. Glaciol.

    (2005)
  • N. Bertler et al.

    Snow chemistry across Antarctica

    Ann. Glaciol.

    (2005)
  • Q. Bian et al.

    A decadal climatology of chemical, physical, and optical properties of ambient smoke in the western and southeastern United States

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2020)
  • T.J. Breider et al.

    Multidecadal trends in aerosol radiative forcing over the Arctic: contribution of changes in anthropogenic aerosol to Arctic warming since 1980

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2017)
  • J.A. Calhoun et al.

    Sulfur isotope measurements of submicrometer sulfate aerosol particles over the Pacific Ocean

    Geophys. Res. Lett.

    (1991)
  • E. Castellano et al.

    Holocene volcanic history as recorded in the sulfate stratigraphy of the European Project for Ice Coring in Antarctica Dome C (EDC96) ice core

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2005)
  • A.W. Castleman et al.

    Contribution of volcanic sulphur compounds to the stratospheric aerosol layer

    Nature

    (1973)
  • R.J. Charlson et al.

    Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate

    Nature

    (1987)
  • R. Charlson et al.

    Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols

    Science (New York, N.Y.)

    (1992)
  • L. Chen et al.

    Latitudinal distributions of atmospheric MSA and MSA/nss-SO42−ratios in summer over the high latitude regions of the Southern and Northern Hemispheres

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (2012)
  • Z. Cong et al.

    Carbonaceous aerosols on the south edge of the Tibetan Plateau: concentrations, seasonality and sources

    Atmos. Chem. Phys.

    (2015)
  • E. Cosme et al.

    Origin of dimethylsulfide, non-sea-salt sulfate, and methanesulfonic acid in eastern Antarctica

    J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.

    (2005)
  • A.S. Criscitiello et al.

    Ice sheet record of recent sea-ice behavior and polynya variability in the Amundsen Sea, West Antarctica

    J. Geophys. Res. Oceans

    (2013)
  • M.A.J. Curran et al.

    Post-depositional movement of methanesulphonic acid at Law Dome, Antarctica, and the influence of accumulation rate

    Ann. Glaciol.

    (2002)
  • M.A.J. Curran et al.

    Ice Core Evidence for Antarctic Sea Ice Decline Since the 1950s

    (2003)
  • A.I. Darer et al.

    Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived organosulfates and organonitrates

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Sulfur deposition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China: Spatiotemporal characterization and regional source attributions

      2022, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sulfur (S) is one of the most important global environmental problems, which can affect global and regional climates, ecosystems, and human health (Pei et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2016).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text