Abstract
In a tribute to the intellectual legacy of Peter Fitzpatrick, this article explores the poiesis of modern law, as a constitutive ambivalence distilled in the affinity between law and literature. Reading with Fitzpatrick, the resolution of the contradictions of this law in myth depends, paradoxically, upon its fundamental irresolution. Reflecting upon the profound significance of his revelation of the mythology of modern law and its scholarly reverberations, I consider the constitutive tensions of this law as exemplified in the relation between praxis and poiesis, the operative function of the former dependent upon the creative unfolding of the latter. The alchemy of autopoiesis, by which law boldly proclaims itself law, is made explicit in the eschatology of its archive and the formation of its sovereign subject in negation. Revealing the literary dimensions of this law, the conceit of autonomy is nonetheless subject to the subversive substitutions of the supplement. Pressing yet further, the autopoiesis of law is found to be enfolded within a generative sympoiesis, constituted by the movement between its apposite dimensions. Ultimately, extending Fitzpatrick’s rendering of the irresolution of modern law as decolonial, I explore the possibilities afforded by a reading of the fundamental mutuality of myths, and the decolonial conviviality of poiesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. The man without content (trans: Georgia Albert). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The open: Man and animal (trans. Kevin Attell). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Attridge, Derek. 1992a. Introduction: Derrida and the questioning of literature. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 1–29. New York, London: Routledge.
Attridge, Derek. 1992b. Preface to Jacques Derrida, …That dangerous supplement…. In Acts of literature, ed. Derek Attridge, 76–77. New York, London: Routledge.
Auden, Wystan Hugh. 1940a. Law, say the gardeners, is the sun. In Another time. London: Faber & Faber.
Auden, Wystan Hugh. 1940b. In memory of W.B. Yeats. In Another time. London: Faber & Faber.
Blanchot, Maurice. 1981. The madness of the day (trans: Lydia Davis). Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press.
Blanchot, Maurice. 1993. The infinite conversation (trans: S. Hanson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Blanchot, Maurice. 1999. Literature and the right to death. In The Station Hill Blanchot Reader: Fiction and literary essays, ed. Maurice Blanchot (trans: L. Davis. Barrytown). NY: Station Hill Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chalmers, Shane. 2020. Negative mythology. Law & Critique 31: 59–72.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition (trans: Paul Patton). London: The Athlone Press.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992a. Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge. New York, London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992b. …That dangerous supplement…. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 76–109. New York, London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992c. Before the law. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 181–220. New York, London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1992d. The law of genre. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 221–252. New York, London: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Archive fever: A freudian impression (trans: Eric Prenowitz). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Monolingualism of the other, or, the prosthesis of origin (trans: Patrick Mensah). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority. In Acts of religion, ed. Gil Anidjar, 230–298. New York: Routledge.
Derrida, Jacques, and David Attridge. 1992. This strange institution called literature: An interview with Jacques Derrida. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge (trans: Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby), 33–75. New York, London: Routledge.
Eliade, Mircea. 1965. The myth of the eternal return or, cosmos and history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Eliade, Mircea. 1968. Myths, dreams and mysteries: The encounter between contemporary faiths and archaic reality. Glasgow: Collins.
Elias, Norbert. 1978. The civilizing process; Volume I: The history of manners (trans: Edmund Jephcott). New York: Urizon Books.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1991. The abstracts and brief chronicles of time: Supplementing jurisprudence. In Dangerous supplements: Resistance and renewal in jurisprudence, ed. Peter Fitzpatrick. London: Pluto Press.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1992. The mythology of modern law. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001a. Modernism and the grounds of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001b. Law like poetry—Burnt Norton. Liverpool Law Review: A Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Policy 23 (3): 285–288.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2004a. Dominions: Law, literature, and the right to death. Journal of Law and Society 31 (1): 142–148.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2004b. Juris-fiction: Literature and the law of the law. Ariel 35 (1–2): 215–229.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2012. Reading slowly: The law of literature and the literature of law. In Reading modern law: Critical methodologies and sovereign formations, ed. Ruth Buchanan, Stewart Motha, and Sundhya Pahuja, 193–210. London and New York: Routledge.
Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2014. The revolutionary past: Decolonizing law and human rights. Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2(1): 117–33.
Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.
Foucault, Michel. 1988. What is an Author? In Modern criticism and theory: A reader, ed. David Lodge (trans: Harari, J. V.). London: Longman.
Freud, Sigmund. 1906–1907. Delusions and dreams in Jensen’s ‘Gradiva’. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (trans: James Strachey), (1953–1974), 80. London: Hogarth.
Freud, Sigmund. 1985. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In Civilisation, society and religion, 169. London: Penguin.
Grear, Anna. 2020. 'Legal imaginaries and the anthropocene: ‘Of’ and ‘For’. Law & Critique 31: 351–366.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Harris, Verne. 2002. A shaft of darkness: Derrida in the archive. In Refiguring the archive, ed. Carolyn Hamilton, Verne Harris, Michèle Pickover, Graeme Reid, Razia Saleh, and Jane Taylor, 61–82. Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic.
Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche, Volume I: The will to power as art (trans: Krell, D. F.). New York: Harper Collins.
Heikkilä, Martta. 2008. At the limits of presentation: Coming-into-presence and its aesthetic relevance in Jean-Luc Nancy’s philosophy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1952. Leviathan. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica.
Jacobson, Arthur J. 1989. Autopoietic law: The new science of Niklas Luhmann. Michigan Law Review 87 (6): 1647–1689.
Kafka, Franz. 2005a. Before the Law. In The complete short stories of Franz Kafka, ed. Nahum N. Glatzer, 3–4 (trans: Willa and Edwin Muir). London: Vintage.
Kafka, Franz. 2005b. The problem of our laws. In The complete short stories of Franz Kafka, ed. Nahum N. Glatzer, 437–438 (trans: Willa and Edwin Muir). London: Vintage.
Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (trans: Allen W Wood). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1987. Anthropology and myth: Lectures 1951–1982. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The autonomy of the legal system. In The differentiation of society (trans: Stephen Holmes and Charles Larmore), 122–137. New York: Columbia University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social systems (trans: Bednarz, J. Jr). Stanford. California: Stanford University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Intro. and ed. William Rasch, (trans: Joseph O’Neill et al.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Margulis, Lynn. 1998. Symbiosis: A new look at evolution. New York: Basic Books.
Maturana, Umberto, and Francisco Varela. 1972. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing.
Mawani, Renisa. 2012. Law’s archive. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 337–365.
Mignolo, Walter. 2007. Delinking. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 449–514.
Mignolo, Walter. 2013. Preamble: The historical foundation of modernity/coloniality and the emergence of decolonial thinking. In A companion to Latin American literature and culture, ed. Sara Castro-Klaren, 12–52. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Morin, Edgar. 1986. La méthode II: La connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.
Motha, Stewart. 2018. Archiving sovereignty: Law, history, violence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Motha, Stewart. 2021. My story, whose memory: Notes on the autonomy and heteronomy of law. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (forthcoming).
Naas, Michael. 2008. Derrida from now on. New York: Fordham University Press.
Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2010. Niklas Luhmann: Law, justice, society. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.
Plato. 1993. Symposium and phaedrus (trans: Jowett, B.). New York: Dover Publications.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968. The social contract (trans: Maurice Cranston). London: Penguin.
Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1911. A defence of poetry, 58. Boston and London: D.C. Heath and Company.
Teubner, Günther. 1984. Autopoiesis in law and society: A rejoinder to Blankenburg. Law & Society Review 18 (2): 291–301.
Teubner, Günther., ed. 1988. Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Teubner, Günther. 1989. How the law thinks: Toward a constructivist epistemology of law. Law & Society Review 23 (5): 728–757.
von Uexküll, Jakob. 2010 [1934, 1940]. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with a theory of meaning (trans: Joseph, D.O’Neil). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Van Dooren, Thom. 2014. Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey, and Urusula Münster. 2014. Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 1–23.
Van Marle, Karin. 2007. Constitution as archive. In Law and the politics of reconciliation, ed. Scott Veitch, 215–228. England, USA: Ashgate.
Vismann, Cornelia. 2008. The archive and the beginning of law. In Derrida and legal philosophy, ed. Peter Goodrich, Florian Hoffmann, Michel Rosenfeld, and Cornelia Vismann, 41–54. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birrell, K. Convivial Mythologies: The Poiesis of Modern Law. Law Critique 32, 315–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09305-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09305-y