Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Convivial Mythologies: The Poiesis of Modern Law

  • Published:
Law and Critique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a tribute to the intellectual legacy of Peter Fitzpatrick, this article explores the poiesis of modern law, as a constitutive ambivalence distilled in the affinity between law and literature. Reading with Fitzpatrick, the resolution of the contradictions of this law in myth depends, paradoxically, upon its fundamental irresolution. Reflecting upon the profound significance of his revelation of the mythology of modern law and its scholarly reverberations, I consider the constitutive tensions of this law as exemplified in the relation between praxis and poiesis, the operative function of the former dependent upon the creative unfolding of the latter. The alchemy of autopoiesis, by which law boldly proclaims itself law, is made explicit in the eschatology of its archive and the formation of its sovereign subject in negation. Revealing the literary dimensions of this law, the conceit of autonomy is nonetheless subject to the subversive substitutions of the supplement. Pressing yet further, the autopoiesis of law is found to be enfolded within a generative sympoiesis, constituted by the movement between its apposite dimensions. Ultimately, extending Fitzpatrick’s rendering of the irresolution of modern law as decolonial, I explore the possibilities afforded by a reading of the fundamental mutuality of myths, and the decolonial conviviality of poiesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. The man without content (trans: Georgia Albert). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2004. The open: Man and animal (trans. Kevin Attell). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Attridge, Derek. 1992a. Introduction: Derrida and the questioning of literature. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 1–29. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attridge, Derek. 1992b. Preface to Jacques Derrida, …That dangerous supplement…. In Acts of literature, ed. Derek Attridge, 76–77. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auden, Wystan Hugh. 1940a. Law, say the gardeners, is the sun. In Another time. London: Faber & Faber.

  • Auden, Wystan Hugh. 1940b. In memory of W.B. Yeats. In Another time. London: Faber & Faber.

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1981. The madness of the day (trans: Lydia Davis). Barrytown, NY: Station Hill Press.

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1993. The infinite conversation (trans: S. Hanson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Blanchot, Maurice. 1999. Literature and the right to death. In The Station Hill Blanchot Reader: Fiction and literary essays, ed. Maurice Blanchot (trans: L. Davis. Barrytown). NY: Station Hill Press.

  • Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, Shane. 2020. Negative mythology. Law & Critique 31: 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition (trans: Paul Patton). London: The Athlone Press.

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix. Guattari. 1983. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992a. Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge. New York, London: Routledge.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992b. …That dangerous supplement…. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 76–109. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992c. Before the law. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 181–220. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992d. The law of genre. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge, 221–252. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1995. Archive fever: A freudian impression (trans: Eric Prenowitz). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Monolingualism of the other, or, the prosthesis of origin (trans: Patrick Mensah). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2002. Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority. In Acts of religion, ed. Gil Anidjar, 230–298. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and David Attridge. 1992. This strange institution called literature: An interview with Jacques Derrida. In Acts of literature, ed. David Attridge (trans: Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby), 33–75. New York, London: Routledge.

  • Eliade, Mircea. 1965. The myth of the eternal return or, cosmos and history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliade, Mircea. 1968. Myths, dreams and mysteries: The encounter between contemporary faiths and archaic reality. Glasgow: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. 1978. The civilizing process; Volume I: The history of manners (trans: Edmund Jephcott). New York: Urizon Books.

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1991. The abstracts and brief chronicles of time: Supplementing jurisprudence. In Dangerous supplements: Resistance and renewal in jurisprudence, ed. Peter Fitzpatrick. London: Pluto Press.

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 1992. The mythology of modern law. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001a. Modernism and the grounds of law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2001b. Law like poetry—Burnt Norton. Liverpool Law Review: A Journal of Contemporary Legal and Social Policy 23 (3): 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2004a. Dominions: Law, literature, and the right to death. Journal of Law and Society 31 (1): 142–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2004b. Juris-fiction: Literature and the law of the law. Ariel 35 (1–2): 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2012. Reading slowly: The law of literature and the literature of law. In Reading modern law: Critical methodologies and sovereign formations, ed. Ruth Buchanan, Stewart Motha, and Sundhya Pahuja, 193–210. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Peter. 2014. The revolutionary past: Decolonizing law and human rights. Metodo: International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 2(1): 117–33.

  • Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1988. What is an Author? In Modern criticism and theory: A reader, ed. David Lodge (trans: Harari, J. V.). London: Longman.

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1906–1907. Delusions and dreams in Jensen’s ‘Gradiva’. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (trans: James Strachey), (1953–1974), 80. London: Hogarth.

  • Freud, Sigmund. 1985. Group psychology and the analysis of the ego. In Civilisation, society and religion, 169. London: Penguin.

  • Grear, Anna. 2020. 'Legal imaginaries and the anthropocene: ‘Of’ and ‘For’. Law & Critique 31: 351–366.

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Verne. 2002. A shaft of darkness: Derrida in the archive. In Refiguring the archive, ed. Carolyn Hamilton, Verne Harris, Michèle Pickover, Graeme Reid, Razia Saleh, and Jane Taylor, 61–82. Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1991. Nietzsche, Volume I: The will to power as art (trans: Krell, D. F.). New York: Harper Collins.

  • Heikkilä, Martta. 2008. At the limits of presentation: Coming-into-presence and its aesthetic relevance in Jean-Luc Nancy’s philosophy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas. 1952. Leviathan. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Brittanica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Arthur J. 1989. Autopoietic law: The new science of Niklas Luhmann. Michigan Law Review 87 (6): 1647–1689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, Franz. 2005a. Before the Law. In The complete short stories of Franz Kafka, ed. Nahum N. Glatzer, 3–4 (trans: Willa and Edwin Muir). London: Vintage.

  • Kafka, Franz. 2005b. The problem of our laws. In The complete short stories of Franz Kafka, ed. Nahum N. Glatzer, 437–438 (trans: Willa and Edwin Muir). London: Vintage.

  • Kant, Immanuel. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (trans: Allen W Wood). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1987. Anthropology and myth: Lectures 1951–1982. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The autonomy of the legal system. In The differentiation of society (trans: Stephen Holmes and Charles Larmore), 122–137. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social systems (trans: Bednarz, J. Jr). Stanford. California: Stanford University Press.

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Theories of distinction: Redescribing the descriptions of modernity. Intro. and ed. William Rasch, (trans: Joseph O’Neill et al.). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Margulis, Lynn. 1998. Symbiosis: A new look at evolution. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, Umberto, and Francisco Varela. 1972. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordecht, Holland: Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawani, Renisa. 2012. Law’s archive. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 337–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter. 2007. Delinking. Cultural Studies 21 (2): 449–514.

  • Mignolo, Walter. 2013. Preamble: The historical foundation of modernity/coloniality and the emergence of decolonial thinking. In A companion to Latin American literature and culture, ed. Sara Castro-Klaren, 12–52. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Mignolo, Walter, and Catherine Walsh. 2018. On decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, praxis. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Edgar. 1986. La méthode II: La connaissance de la connaissance. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motha, Stewart. 2018. Archiving sovereignty: Law, history, violence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Motha, Stewart. 2021. My story, whose memory: Notes on the autonomy and heteronomy of law. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society (forthcoming).

  • Naas, Michael. 2008. Derrida from now on. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, Andreas. 2010. Niklas Luhmann: Law, justice, society. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. 1993. Symposium and phaedrus (trans: Jowett, B.). New York: Dover Publications.

  • Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968. The social contract (trans: Maurice Cranston). London: Penguin.

  • Shelley, Percy Bysshe. 1911. A defence of poetry, 58. Boston and London: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, Günther. 1984. Autopoiesis in law and society: A rejoinder to Blankenburg. Law & Society Review 18 (2): 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, Günther., ed. 1988. Autopoietic law: A new approach to law and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, Günther. 1989. How the law thinks: Toward a constructivist epistemology of law. Law & Society Review 23 (5): 728–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Uexküll, Jakob. 2010 [1934, 1940]. A foray into the worlds of animals and humans, with a theory of meaning (trans: Joseph, D.O’Neil). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Van Dooren, Thom. 2014. Flight ways: Life and loss at the edge of extinction. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey, and Urusula Münster. 2014. Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Marle, Karin. 2007. Constitution as archive. In Law and the politics of reconciliation, ed. Scott Veitch, 215–228. England, USA: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vismann, Cornelia. 2008. The archive and the beginning of law. In Derrida and legal philosophy, ed. Peter Goodrich, Florian Hoffmann, Michel Rosenfeld, and Cornelia Vismann, 41–54. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen Birrell.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birrell, K. Convivial Mythologies: The Poiesis of Modern Law. Law Critique 32, 315–330 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09305-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09305-y

Keywords

Navigation