Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity analysis and optimisation of HVOF process inputs to reduce porosity and maximise hardness of WC-10Co-4Cr coatings

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims at developing an empirical relation to predict the porosity and micro-hardness, by means of High Velocity Oxy Fuel (HVOF) sprayed WC-10Co-4Cr coatings. For determining the coating performance, process parameters such as flow rate of LPG fuel, flow rate of oxygen, spray distance, flow rate of carrier gas and feed rate of the coating powder play a significant role. Five-factors, five-level central composite rotatable design (CCD) was employed in this analysis to reduce the number of experiments by covering all possible combinations of the process variables. A mathematical model was established to assess the porosity and microhardness of the coatings including HVOF process parameters and the appropriateness of the model was examined using analysis of variance. Using RSM, process parameter optimizations were conducted. The coatings produced using optimized process variables had a minimum porosity level of 0.2 Vol. percentage and a maximum hardness of 1325.26 HVx compared to other coatings. This has been confirmed by the developing response graphs and also by plotting contours. The optimization of HVOF parameters using RSM, as well as the correlation of spray variables with properties of the coating, enables the recognition of the framework of the characteristics to attain the preferred consistency of WC-10Co-4Cr coatings. Analysis of Sensitivity is also performed to determine the most significant process parameter for the HVOF operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A:

Oxygen flow rate

B:

LPG flow rate

C:

Powder feed rate

D:

Stand-off distance

E:

Carrier gas flow rate

HVx :

Hardness value

References

  1. Aw P K and Tan B H 2006 Study of microstructure, phase and micro hardness distribution of HVOF sprayed multi modal structured and conventional WC–17Co coatings. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 174(1): 305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Q, Luo S, Wang S, Wang H and Ramachandran C S 2019 Erosion and corrosion resistance of HVOF-sprayed WC and Cr3C2 based coatings for electrolytic hard chrome replacement. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 81: 242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahuja L, Mudgal D, Singh S and Prakash S 2018 A comparative study to evaluate the corrosion performance of Zr incorporated Cr3C2-(NiCr) coating at 900°C. Ceram. Int. 44(6): 6479–6492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Y, Liu W, Ma Y and Meng S 2017 A comparative study on wear and corrosion behaviour of HVOF- and HVAF-sprayed WC–10Co–4Cr coatings. Surf. Eng. 33(1): 63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding X, Ke Du, Yuan C and Zhangxiong D 2018 Microstructure and cavitation erosion resistance of HVOF deposited WC-Co coatings with different sized WC. Coatings 8(9): 307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santana Y Y, Renault P O, Sebastiani M and La Barbera-Sosa J G 2008 Characterization and residual stresses of WC–Co thermally sprayed coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 202(18): 4560–4565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu X, Kang J, Yue W, Fu Z, Zhu L, She D, Liang J and Wang C 2019 Performance evaluation of HVOF sprayed WC-10Co-4Cr coatings under slurry erosion. Surf. Eng. 35(9): 816–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bansal A, Singh J and Singh H 2019 Slurry erosion behavior of HVOF sprayed WC-10Co-4Cr coated SS 316 steel with and without PTFE modification. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 28(19): 1448–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo X, Planche M P, Chen J and Liao H 2014 Relationships between in-flight particle characteristics and properties of HVOF sprayed WC-Co-Cr coatings. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(2): 456–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Kang J, Yue W, Fu Z, Zhu L, She D, Liang J and Wang C 2019 Performance evaluation of HVOF sprayed WC-10Co-4Cr coatings under slurry erosion. Surf. Eng. 370(9): 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bansal P, Shipway P H and Leen S B 2007 Residual stresses in high-velocity oxy-fuel thermally sprayed coatings—modelling the effect of particle velocity and temperature during the spraying process. Acta Materialia 55(15): 5089–5101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dyshlovenko S, Pawlowski L, Roussel P, Murano D and Maguer A E 2006 Relationship between plasma spray operational parameters and microstructure of hydroxyapatite coatings and powder sprayed into water. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200(12–13): 3845–3855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang W, Cho T Y, Yoon J H, Song K O, Hur S K, Youn S J and Chun H G 2009 Processing optimization, surface properties and wear behavior of HVOF spraying WC-CrC-Ni coating. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(7): 3561–3567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramachandran C S, Balasubramanian V and Ananthapadmanabhan P V 2012 Synthesis, spheroidization and spray deposition of lanthanum zirconate using thermal plasma process. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206(13): 3017–3035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murugan K, Ragupathy A, Balasubramanian V and Sridhar K 2014 Developing empirical relationships to predict hardness in WC-Co-Cr HVOF sprayed coating. Proc. Mater. Sci. 5: 918–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kiragi V R, Patnaik A, Singh T and Fekete G 2019 Parametric optimization of erosive wear response of TiAlN-coated aluminium alloy using Taguchi method. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 28(1): 838–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Datta S, Pratihar D K and Bandyopadhyay P P 2012 Modeling of input–output relationships for a plasma spray coating process using soft computing tools. Appl. Soft Comput. 12(11): 3356–3368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vaidya A, Srinivasan V, Streibl T, Friis M, Chi W and Sampath S 2008 Process maps for plasma spraying of yttria-stabilized zirconia: an integrated approach to design, optimization and reliability. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 497(1–2): 239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oksa M, Turunen E, Suhonen T, Varis T and Hannula S P 2011 Optimization and characterization of high velocity oxy-fuel sprayed coatings: techniques, materials, and applications. Coatings 1(1): 17–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mawdsley J R, Su Y J, Faber K T and Bernecki T F 2001 Optimization of small-particle plasma-sprayed alumina coatings using designed experiments. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 308(1–2): 189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin B T, Jean M D and Chou J H 2007 Using response surface methodology with response transformation in optimizing plasma spraying coatings. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 34(3): 307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramachandaran C S, Balasubramanian V and Ananthapadmanbhan P V 2010 Multiobjective optimization of atmospheric plasma spray process parameters to deposit yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings using response surface methodology. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 20(3): 590–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM B276-05 2015 Standard Test Method for Apparent Porosity in Cemented Carbides. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  24. ASTM C633-01 2008 Standard Test Method for Adhesion or Cohesion Strength of Thermal Spray Coatings. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vignesh S, Shanmugam K, Balasubramanian V and Sridhar K 2017 Identifying the optimal HVOF spray parameters to attain minimum porosity and maximum hardness in iron based amorphous metallic coatings. Def. Technol. 13(2): 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tillman W, Vogli E, Baumann I, Kopp G and Weihs C 2010 Desirability-based multi-criteria optimization of HVOF Spray experiments to manufacture fine structured wear-resistant 75Cr3C2-25(NiCr20) coatings. J. Thermal Spray Technol. 19(1): 392–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khuri A I and Cornell J A 1996 Response Surfaces; Design and Analysis. Marcel Dekker Ltd, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ding Y, Zhu L, Zhang X and Ding H 2012 Response sensitivity analysis of the dynamic milling process based on the numerical integration method. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 25(5): 940–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Palani P K and Murugan N 2006 Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in cladding of stainless steel by flux cored arc welding. J. Manuf. Process. 8(2): 90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to express their deepest gratitude to the Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Tamil Nadu, India for providing the facilities for coating characterization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Resmi V Prasad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prasad, R.V., Rajesh, R., Thirumalaikumarasamy, D. et al. Sensitivity analysis and optimisation of HVOF process inputs to reduce porosity and maximise hardness of WC-10Co-4Cr coatings. Sādhanā 46, 149 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01667-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-021-01667-4

Keywords

Navigation