Skip to main content
Log in

The Arts in Sacred Spaces: How Religious Conservatism and Cultural Omnivorousness Influence Attitudes About Congregational Involvement in the Arts

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Review of Religious Research

Abstract

Background

How do religious and cultural sensibilities influence attitudes towards congregational involvement in the arts? Although religion’s role in constructing symbolic boundaries influences adherents’ behaviors both inside and outside of sacred spaces, a predominant focus on economic and cultural factors in the scholarship on cultural tastes and practices has tended to relegate religion to a marginal position in the literature. Theories of class-based cultural tastes and omnivorousness have only rarely been applied to the study of religion and even less so to the intersection between tastes or practices and the sacredness of congregational contexts.

Purpose

This study aims to bridge the gap between the sociology of religion and of culture by showing how considerations about congregational spaces present a complex set of boundaries for practitioners when it comes to the arts, such that acceptance or rejection of the latter is conditioned by the form it takes. The study also examines the extent to which the inclusionary effects of cultural omnivorousness, by volume and composition, apply to attitudes about these sacred spaces.

Methods

This study uses data from the Arts and Religion Survey to run logistic regressions on attitudes towards a range of forms of congregational participation in the arts.

Results

The results show that religious conservatism and such attitudes are not intrinsically opposed. Instead, conservatism is consistently negatively related only when artistic inclusion does not have well-defined symbolic boundaries (i.e., is culturally atypical). Cultural omnivorousness also has varied effects. Omnivorousness by volume but not by composition predicts openness to congregational involvement in the arts, albeit only for well-defined and recognizable artistic forms.

Conclusions and Implications

It is cultural atypicality (rather than variety) that is antithetical to conservative conceptions of the sacred. Moreover, because religious conservatism offers specifically religious understandings of legitimacy for sacred spaces, omnivorousness by composition, which deals in matters of (cultural) legitimacy, has little to offer, and it is only omnivorousness by volume that extends its inclusivity to attitudes about congregational involvement in the arts. The study concludes with a discussion of data limitations and recommendations for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarons, Haydn. 2018. Moral Distinction: Religion, Musical Taste and the Moral Cultural Consumer. Journal of Consumer Culture 21: 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540518787584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARDA. 2019. The Association of Religion Data Archives. http://www.thearda.com/. Accessed February 9.

  • Atkinson, Will. 2011. The Context and Genesis of Musical Tastes: Omnivorousness Debunked, Bourdieu Buttressed. Poetics 39: 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. Edited by Randal Johnson. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2010. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, Bethany. 1996. “Anything But Heavy Metal”: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes. American Sociological Review 61: 884–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Tak Wing, and John H. Goldthorpe. 2007. The Social Stratification of Cultural Consumption: Some Policy Implications of a Research Project. Cultural Trends 16: 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, Mark. 2004. Congregations in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, Mark. 2011. American Religion Contemporary Trends. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Helana. 2018. Omnivorous Masculinity: Gender Capital and Cultural Legitimacy in Craft Beer Culture. Social Currents 5: 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496517748336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Nancy J., and Robert V. Robinson. 1996. Are the Rumors of War Exaggerated? Religious Orthodoxy and Moral Progressivism in America. American Journal of Sociology 102: 756–787. https://doi.org/10.1086/230996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Francie Ostrower. 1990. Participation in the Arts by Black and White Americans. Social Forces 68: 753–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, Jonathan. 2017. Congregational Music, Conflict and Community. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315546247.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile. 2008. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. Edited by Joseph Ward Swain. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.

  • Ellison, Christopher G., and March A. Musick. 1993. Southern Intolerance: A Fundamental Effect. Social Forces 72: 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrant, Coline. 2018. Class, Culture, and Structure: Stratification and Mechanisms of Omnivorousness. Sociology Compass 12: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemmen, Magne P., Vegard Jarness, and Lennart Rosenlund. 2019. Omnivorousness and Openness: Comments to Tak Wing Chan. The British Journal of Sociology 70: 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glevarec, Hervé, and Michel Pinet. 2017. Is Cultural Eclecticism Axiological and a New Mark of Distinction? Cultural Diversification and Social Differentiation of Tastes in France. Cultural Sociology 11: 188–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Amir, Michael T. Hannan, and Balázs Kovács. 2016. What Does it Mean to Span Cultural Boundaries? Variety and Atypicality in Cultural Consumption. American Sociological Review 81: 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gormly, E. 2003. Evangelizing through Appropriation: Toward a Cultural Theory on the Growth of Contemporary Christian Music. Journal of Media and Religion 2: 251–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Roderick. 2009. The Function of Music Education in the Growth of Cultural Openness in the USA. Music Education Research 11: 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D.B. 1997. Distinction in America? Recovering Bourdieu’s Theory of Tastes from its Critics. Poetics 25: 93–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulsether, Mark. 2007. Religion, Culture and Politics in the Twentieth-Century United States. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ingalls, Monique M. 2018. Singing the Congregation: How Contemporary Worship Music Forms Evangelical Community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Cathryn, Timothy J. Dowd, and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. 2006. Legitimacy as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Gerro, Tally. 2002. Highbrow Cultural Consumption and Class Distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Social Forces 81: 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2002.0050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Gerro, Tally, Sharon Raz, and Meir Yaish. 2009. How Do Class, Status, Ethnicity, and Religiosity shape Cultural Omnivorousness in Israel? Journal of Cultural Economics 33: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-008-9088-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, Ari Y. 2018. Shout to the Lord: Making Worship Music in Evangelical America. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahire, Bernard. 2008. The Individual and the Mixing of Genres: Cultural Dissonance and Self-Distinction. Poetics 36: 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle, and Virág Molnár. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle, Sabrina Pendergrass, and Mark Pachucki. 2015. Symbolic Boundaries. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: 850–855https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10416-7

  • Lizardo, Omar, and Sara Skiles. 2012. Reconceptualizing and Theorizing “Omnivorousness”: Genetic and Relational Mechanisms. Sociological Theory 30: 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112466999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V. 2001. Religious Americans and the Arts in the 1990s. In Crossroads: Art and Religion in American Life, 71–102.

  • Mood, Carina. 2010. Logistic Regression: Why We Cannot Do What We Think We Can Do, and What We Can Do About It. European Sociological Review 26: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola, Anna. 2011. US Evangelicals and the Redefinition. In Mediating Faiths: Religion and Socio-Cultural Change in the Twenty-First Century, 131–143. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

  • O’Brien, John, and Eman Abdelhadi. 2020. Re-examining Restructuring: Racialization, Religious Conservatism, and Political Leanings in Contemporary American Life. Social Forces 99: 474–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soaa029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oleschuk, Merin. 2017. Foodies of Color: Authenticity and Exoticism in Omnivorous Food Culture. Cultural Sociology 11: 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975516668709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollivier, Michèle. 2008. Modes of Openness to Cultural Diversity: Humanist, Populist, Practical, and Indifferent. Poetics 36: 120–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Nile DeGray. 2020. Who Goes to Shows? Race-ethnicity and the Visual and Performing Arts. Cultural Sociology 14: 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975519885467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A. 1992. Understanding Audience Segmentation: From Elite and Mass to Omnivore and Univore. Poetics 21: 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A. 2005. Problems in Comparative Research: The Example of Omnivorousness. Poetics 33: 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A., and Roger M. Kern. 1996. Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore. American Sociological Review 61: 900–907. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Richard A., and Albert Simkus. 1992. How Musical Taste Groups Mark Occupational Status Groups. In Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, ed. Michèle Lamont and Marcel Fournier, 152–168. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Mark. 2016. Contemporary Worship Music and Everyday Musical Lives. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purhonen, Semi, Jukka Gronow, and Keijo Rahkonen. 2010. Nordic Democracy of Taste? Cultural Omnivorousness in Musical and Literary Taste Preferences in Finland. Poetics 38: 266–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Jeremy. 2012. The Ties That Divide: Bonding Social Capital, Religious Friendship Networks, and Political Tolerance among Evangelicals*: The Ties That Divide. Sociological Inquiry 82: 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2012.00409.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, Mark. 2012. Beyond Omnivores and Univores: The Promise of a Concept of Musical Habitus. Cultural Sociology 6: 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robette, Nicolas, and Olivier Roueff. 2014. An Eclectic Eclecticism: Methodological and Theoretical Issues about the Quantification of Cultural Omnivorism. Poetics 47: 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanowski, William D. 1992. Roll over Beethoven, tell Martin Luther the News: American Evangelicals and Rock Music. Journal of American Culture 15: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roose, Henk, Koen van Eijck, and John Lievens. 2012. Culture of Distinction or Culture of Openness? Using a Social Space Approach to Analyze the Social Structuring of Lifestyles. Poetics 40: 491–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, Nancy A. 2012. “Oh, You Didn’t think Just the Devil Writes Songs, Do Ya?”: Music in American Evangelical Culture Today. Popular Music and Society 35: 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwadel, Philip, and Christopher R H. Garneau. 2019. Sectarian Religion and Political Tolerance in the United States. Sociology of Religion 80: 168–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/sry032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherkat, Darren E., Melissa Powell-Williams, Gregory Maddox, and Kylan Mattias de Vries. 2011. Religion, Politics, and Support for Same-Sex Marriage in the United States, 1988–2008. Social Science Research 40: 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.08.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Christian. 1998. American Evangelicalism: Embattled and Thriving. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Rodney, and Roger Finke. 2000. Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Robert A., Jerry Z. Park, and Diana Kendall. 2019. Religious Conservatives and TV News: Are They More Likely to be Religiously Offended? Social Problems 66: 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spy024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stichele, AlexanderVander, and Rudi Laermans. 2006. Cultural Participation in Flanders: Testing the Cultural Omnivore Thesis with Population Data. Poetics 34: 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenstra, Gerry. 2015. Class Position and Musical Tastes: A Sing-Off between the Cultural Omnivorism and Bourdieusian Homology Frameworks. Canadian Review of Sociology/revue Canadienne De Sociologie 52: 134–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verter, Bradford. 2003. Spiritual Capital: Theorizing religion with Bourdieu against Bourdieu. Sociological Theory 21: 150–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, Alan, David Wright, and Modesto Gayo-Cal. 2007. Understanding Cultural Omnivorousness: Or, the Myth of the Cultural Omnivore. Cultural Sociology 1: 143–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warde, Alan, David Wright, and Modesto Gayo-Cal. 2008. The Omnivorous Orientation in the UK. Poetics 36: 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2008.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodberry, Robert D., and Christian S. Smith. 1998. Fundamentalism Et Al: Conservative Protestants in America. Annual Review of Sociology 24: 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert. 1999. Arts and Religion Survey [computer file]. Gallup Organization.

  • Wuthnow, Robert. 2006. All in Sync: How Music and Art are Revitalizing American Religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers and editor, as well as Timothy Dowd and Kjerstin Gruys, for their feedback on early drafts of the paper. Thanks also to Mariah Evans for productive conversations about operationalizing complex variables.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Bok.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bok, J. The Arts in Sacred Spaces: How Religious Conservatism and Cultural Omnivorousness Influence Attitudes About Congregational Involvement in the Arts. Rev Relig Res 64, 77–101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-021-00467-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-021-00467-w

Keywords

Navigation