Abstract
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has been widely associated to the reestablishment of anteroposterior body polarities in the embryonic development and regeneration in animals. For instance, in annelids, cellular proliferation, wound healing, and blastema development can be affected when this pathway is disrupted. However, very little is known about the genetic regulatory processes involved in these anomalies. Here, we investigate the morphological effects of 1-azakenpaullone, a pharmacological inhibitor of GSK3β that is supposed to over-activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, during the anterior and posterior regeneration of the annelid Syllis malaquini. The results showed that high concentrations of 1-azakenpaullone affect the stages of blastema differentiation and resegmentation. Therefore, GSK3β-associated gene regulatory networks are candidate to investigate the genetic mechanisms involved in the regular course of S. malaquini regeneration.
Introduction
GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3) is a component of the genetic pathways widely related to the anteroposterior (AP) axis specification during embryonic and post-embryonic development in Bilateria, such as the Wnt/β-catenin and hedgehog signaling pathways (Croce and McClay 2006; Kim and Kimmel 2006). The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has been addressed to several developmental processes like morphogenesis, organogenesis, homeostasis, and regeneration (Croce and McClay 2006; Lee et al. 2006; Lengfeld et al. 2009). Studies in acoels (Sikes and Bely 2010) and annelids (Demilly et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2020) used successful procedures to disrupt the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by using, for example, pharmacological inhibitors of GSK3. 1-Azakenpaullone (AZP) is one of the most known pharmacological inhibitors used in experiments. It is a selective inhibitor of GSK3β and, by stimulating the transcription of β-catenin-related genes, can be considered a positive regulator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Kunick et al. 2004; Mfopou et al. 2014).
The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays important roles during embryogenesis, larval development in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin and Milne Edwards 1833) (Schneider and Bowerman 2007; Demilly et al. 2013; Žídek et al. 2018), and during regeneration in the annelid Aeolosoma viride Stephenson 1911 (Chen et al. 2020). In A. viride, the inhibition of GSK3β showed an increase in nuclear β-catenin during regeneration, which affected cellular proliferation, wound healing, and blastema development (Chen et al. 2020). Interestingly, data on other annelids revealed that some genes associated to the Wnt/ β-catenin pathway are expressed during regeneration. For example, β-catenin is highly expressed in the blastema of Pristina leidyi Smith 1896, asvisualized by in situ hybridization (Smith 1896; Nyberg et al. 2012) and is up-regulated during the anterior regeneration of Syllis gracilis Grube 1840, as shown by transcriptomic analysis (Ribeiro et al. 2019).
Disruption of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway has resulted in heteromorphic regeneration of multiple heads or tails in planarians (Gurley et al. 2008; Petersen and Reddien 2008) and loss of polarity in acoels (Sikes and Bely 2010). Body AP heteromorphs, such as bifurcated and bipolar heads and tails, can also arise in annelids, another group of animals with extensive regeneration abilities (Andrews 1892; Hyman 1916; Myohara et al. 1999; Kawamoto et al. 2005). Reports of heteromorphies in annelids of the family Syllidae are very intriguing. There are records of bifurcated heads (Langerhans 1881) and tails (Andrews 1891, 1892), bipolar tails (Okada 1929), and even bifurcation of internal systems, such as a double proventricle (a muscular structure of the anterior foregut) (Ribeiro et al. 2020). However, little is known whether such bifurcated and bipolar forms were resulted of alterations in the genetic regulatory processes involved in annelid regeneration.
Syllis malaquini Ribeiro et al. 2020 has been recently proposed as a suitable species for developmental studies. This species is able to reproduce by asexual fission and has remarkable ability of axial regeneration (regeneration of structures of the main body axis, e.g., heads and tails (see Zattara (2020)) (Ribeiro et al. 2020). A comprehensive study of the regenerative ability of S. malaquini is available, and it describes five regeneration stages: (1) wound closure, (2) blastema development, (3) blastema differentiation, (4) resegmentation, and (5) growth and reestablishment of digestive functions (Ribeiro et al. 2021). In this study, we assessed the morphogenetic effects of the selective pharmacological inhibitor of GSK3β 1-azakenpaullone (AZP) in S. malaquini regeneration, demonstrating that this approach is useful to investigate whether the involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in annelid regeneration.
Material and methods
Specimens of S. malaquini were collected from marine aquariums at the Departamento de Biología of the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Spain, and the Animal Evolution and Biodiversity Department of the Georg-August University, Göttingen (GAUG), Germany. Specimens with no signs of regeneration or reproduction, bearing 60-65 segments, were selected for posttraumatic regeneration experiments. The specimens were amputated between segments 21 and 22 (intestine level, see Fig. 1) and allowed to regenerate for eight days post-amputation (dpa). The experiment at UAM was made in solutions with three different drug concentrations plus control of each: (1) 1 µM AZP in 0.01% DMSO, 0.01% DMSO as control; (2) 10 µM AZP, 0.1% DMSO as control; and (3) 20 µM AZP, 0.2% DMSO as control. The regeneration medium was prepared with filtered artificial sea water (ASW) after dissolution of AZP (Sigma-Aldrich A-3734) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich D8418) or only DMSO in control treatments. During experiments, those specimens (n = 10 per treatment) were maintained in six-well plates with their respective media, and some sterilized grains of sand, at room temperature (25 °C). Their respective media were changed each three days. A replicate of the experiment was performed at GAUG with the following solutions and concentrations: (1) 1 µM AZP in 0.01% DMSO, 0.01% DMSO as control, and (2) 10 µM AZP, 0.1% DMSO as control, were done (n = 10 per treatment, 8 days observation). In this case, medium was changed daily to check possible inactivation of the inhibitor during the first experiment in which the medium was changed every three days (Supplementary Material 1).
In both experiments, we assessed regeneration during the first 8 dpa, moment in which resegmentation occurs in S. malaquini (Ribeiro et al. 2021). On the last day (8 dpa), the regenerated segments were counted in all amputees. However, there was a mortality of one posterior regenerating amputee in the trials of 1 µM AZP and 0.01 DMSO, which reduced the number of specimens examined to 9. No specimens died in the other treatments (n = 10 per treatment). Specimens were observed and photographed daily using a compound microscope Nikon Eclipse E100 with a mounted mobile phone Xiaomi Redmi 8 (UAM) and with a Leica MZ 125 stereomicroscope equipped with software analysis getIT for morphological account (GAUG). Segments were counted considering the observation of septa and body constrictions in living animals, at 200 × magnification. Statistical difference on the number of regenerated segments was tested using Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test, performed with the software R, using RStudio version 1.4.1106 (R Core Team 2020).
Results and discussion
In both anterior and posterior regeneration, no morphological differences were noticed between the trial of 1 µM AZP and all control trials (0.01% DMSO, 0.1% DMSO, 0.2% DMSO). The animals in these treatments regenerated in a comparable pace along the stages in observation. The anterior regeneration blastema was developed around 2–4 dpa (Fig. 2a–c, e) and resegmentation could be observed from 6 dpa, with about two–three segments added until 8dpa (Fig. 2g–i, k). In the posterior regeneration, blastema differentiation occurred around 2–3 days post-amputation (dpa) (Fig. 2a’–c’, e’), and resegmentation could be observed from 4–5 dpa, with about two–three segments added until 8dpa (Fig. 2g’–i’, k). In these treatments, the amputees regenerated accordingly with previous description of S. malaquini regeneration under non-treated conditions (animals maintained in ASW only); i.e., they reached stage of resegmentation within 8 days after bisection (Ribeiro et al. 2021). No differences were observed between experiments performed at GAGU (daily change of medium) and at UAM (change of medium every three days).
On the other hand, in the trials with 10 µM and 20 µM AZP, resegmentation was not seen at 8 dpa. The blastema of both anterior and posterior regenerating amputees of those conditions developed around 2–4 dpa, as well as what happened in the other trials (Fig. 2e, e’, f, f’). However, the stages of blastema differentiation and resegmentation were affected. As regards the treatment of 10 µM AZP, anterior regenerates showed up to two segments within 8 dpa (Figs. 2j, 3a), while posterior regenerates showed up to one regenerated segment, and most of them have not started resegmentation (6 of 10) (Figs. 1j’ and 3b). The results obtained in controls and in the treatment with 10 µM AZP were comparable in both experiments (Figures S1 and S2, Supplementary Material 1).
In the treatment of 20 µM AZP, anterior regenerates did not add segments within 8 dpa (Figs. 2l and 3a), except for one specimen that had regenerated two poorly developed segments (Figure S3a, Supplementary Material 1). Meanwhile, posterior regenerates exposed to 20 µM AZP showed up to one regenerated segment, and most of them have not added segments (7 of 10) (Figs. 2l’, 3b, S1, and S2).
The number of anterior segments regenerated in controls versus animals exposed to AZP was significantly different (χ2 = 24.053, p < 0.01). Likewise, the number of posterior segments regenerated in controls versus animals exposed to AZP was significantly different (χ2 = 32.596, p < 0.001), according to the Kruskal–Wallis analysis (Fig. 3a, b). No alterations were seen in the non-regenerating body of amputees. In both experiments (medium change every three days or every 24 h), the outputs were equivalent, which reveals that results are replicable and consistent and that the inhibitor was active during both treatments.
These results reveal that blastema differentiation (during anterior regeneration) and resegmentation (during posterior regeneration) are disturbed in amputees of S. malaquini exposed to high concentrations of AZP for 8 dpa. These stages imply cellular proliferation and differentiation and, in non-treated conditions, both events occur within 4 dpa in animals amputated at the level of intestine (Ribeiro et al. 2021). Within Annelida, some studies have shown the requirement of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in various cellular processes. In A. viride, anterior regenerating specimens treated with AZP showed an inhibition of cell proliferation in the wounded tissue, which disturbed wound healing and blastema formation (Chen et al. 2020).
Notably, one specimen of the treatment with 20 µM AZP regenerated a pygidium with a bifurcated cirrus with branches of unequal length after 8 dpa (Fig. 2l’ and S3). Bifurcated cirri and antennae have been repeatedly reported in syllids in the literature, either in specimens found in nature or in the laboratory, as a result of bisection-based experiments (Malaquin 1893; Michel 1909; Durchon and Wissocq 1964; Mohammad 1981). However, the appearance of bifurcated appendages during regeneration in pharmacological essays has not been documented before in annelids. GSK3β inhibitors (including AZP) affect the anteroposterior polarity in acoels, in which whole individuals and tissues of the worms became globular when exposed to AZP, indicating a loss of axial polarity (Sikes and Bely 2010). In annelids, posterior bipolarity can occur via regeneration after specific types of surgical procedure. For instance, bisection at the most anterior segments in aquatic oligochaetes resulted in the regeneration of posterior heads in place of tails in fragments with head, forming bipolar individuals (Müller 1908; Okada 1934a, b; Myohara et al. 1999; Kawamoto et al. 2005; Myohara 2012). There is a unique record of a bipolar-tailed syllid, Myrianida edwarsi (Saint-Joseph 1886) that regenerated an anterior tail (Okada 1929), though the study described the specimen only, and no further explanation about the process was provided.
In this study, the processes of blastema differentiation and resegmentation are affected by a selective inhibitor of GSK3β during regeneration in S. malaquini based on morphological observations. Thus, GSK3β-associated pathways (e.g., Wnt/β-catenin) are candidate modules to investigate the genetic mechanisms involved in the regular course of S. malaquini regeneration. However, solid evidence based on genetic essays should be further achieved to better understand how the GSK3β inhibition generates the morphological changes observed here.
Data availability
The data obtained in this study are included within the article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Andrews EA (1891) Report upon the Annelida Polychaeta of Beaufort, North Carolina. Proc U S Natl Mus 14:277–302
Andrews EA (1892) Bifurcated annelids. Am Nat 26:725–733
Audouin JV, Milne Edwards H (1833) Classification des Annélides et description de celles qui habitent les côtes de la France. Annales Des Sciences Naturelles Zoologie 1:195–269
Chen C-Y, Yueh W-T, Chen J-H (2020) Canonical Wnt signaling is involved in anterior regeneration of the annelid Aeolosoma viride. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.01.972448
Croce JC, McClay DR (2006) The canonical Wnt pathway in embryonic axis polarity. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.004
Demilly A, Steinmetz P, Gazave E et al (2013) Involvement of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in neurectoderm architecture in Platynereis dumerilii. Nat Commun 4:1911–1915. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2915
Durchon M, Wissocq J-C (1964) Contribution a l’etude de la stolonisation chez les syllidiens (Annélides, Polychètes) II. Autolytinae. Annales Des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie 12:159–212
Grube AE (1840) Actinien, Echinodermen und Würmer des Adriatischen- und Mittelmeers, nach eigenen Sammlungen. Verlag von J. H. Bon, Königsberg
Gurley KA, Rink JC, Alvarado AS (2008) β-Catenin defines head versus tail identity during planarian regeneration and homeostasis. Science 319:323–327
Hyman LH (1916) An analysis of the process of regeneration in certain microdrilous oligochaetes. J Exp Zool 20:99–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1400200204
Kawamoto S, Yoshida-Noro C, Tochinai S (2005) Bipolar head regeneration induced by artificial amputation in Enchytraeus japonensis (Annelida, Oligochaeta). J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 303A:615–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.a.205
Kim L, Kimmel AR (2006) GSK3 at the edge: regulation of developmental specification and cell polarization. Curr Drug Targets 7:1411–1419. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450110607011411
Kunick C, Lauenroth K, Leost M et al (2004) 1-Azakenpaullone is a selective inhibitor of glycogen synthase kinase-3β. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 14:413–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.10.062
Langerhans P (1881) Ueber einige canarische Anneliden Nova Acta Academiae Caesareae Leopoldino-Carolinae Germanicae. Naturae Curiosorum 42:95–124
Lee PN, Pang K, Matus DQ, Martindale MQ (2006) A WNT of things to come: evolution of Wnt signaling and polarity in cnidarians. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.05.002
Lengfeld T, Watanabe H, Simakov O et al (2009) Multiple Wnts are involved in Hydra organizer formation and regeneration. Dev Biol 330:186–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.02.004
Malaquin A (1893) Recherches sur les syllidiens: morphologie, anatomie, reproduction, développement. L. Danel, Lille
Mfopou JK, Geeraerts M, Dejene R et al (2014) Efficient definitive endoderm induction from mouse embryonic stem cell adherent cultures: a rapid screening model for differentiation studies. Stem Cell Res 12:166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2013.10.004
Michel MA (1909) Sur la formation du corps par la réunion de deux moitiés indépendantes, d’après l’origine de la queue de la souche chez les Syllidés. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires Des Séances De L’académie Des Sciences 148:1421–1423
Mohammad M-BM (1981) Malformations in some polychaete annelids from Kuwait, Arabian gulf. Hydrobiologia 78:129–131
Müller C (1908) Regenerationsversuche an Lumbriculus variegatus und Tubifex rivulorum. Archiv Für Entwicklungsmechanik Der Organismen 26:209–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162937
Myohara M (2012) What role do annelid neoblasts play? A comparison of the regeneration patterns in a neoblast-bearing and a neoblast-lacking enchytraeid oligochaete. PLoS ONE 7:e37319. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037319
Myohara M, Yoshida-Nora C, Kobari F, Tochinai S (1999) Fragmenting oligochaete Enchytraeus japonesis: a new material for regeneration study. Develop Growth Differ 41:549–555
Nyberg KG, Conte MA, Kostyun JL et al (2012) Transcriptome characterization via 454 pyrosequencing of the annelid Pristina leidyi, an emerging model for studying the evolution of regeneration. BMC Genomics 13:287. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-287
Okada YK (1929) Regeneration and fragmentation in the syllidian polychaetes. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech 115:542–600
Okada YK (1934a) Formation de têtes dans la stolonisation des polychètes syllidiens. Bull Biol Fr Belg 68:388–405
Okada YK (1934b) Régénération de la tête chez le polychète Myxicola aesthetica (Clap.). Bull Biol Fr Belg 68:340–381
Petersen CP, Reddien PW (2008) Smed-βcatenin-1 is required for anteroposterior blastema polarity in planarian regeneration. Science 319:327 LP – 330
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Ribeiro RP, Egger B, Ponz-Segrelles G, Aguado MT (2021) Cellular proliferation dynamics during regeneration in Syllis malaquini (Syllidae, Annelida). Front Zool 18:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12983-021-00396-y
Ribeiro RP, Ponz-Segrelles G, Bleidorn C, Aguado MT (2019) Comparative transcriptomics in Syllidae (Annelida) indicates that posterior regeneration and regular growth are comparable, while anterior regeneration is a distinct process. BMC Genomics 20:855. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6223-y
Ribeiro RP, Ponz-Segrelles G, Helm C et al (2020) A new species of Syllis including transcriptomic data and an updated phylogeny of Syllinae (Annelida: Syllidae). Mar Biodivers 50:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01046-y
Saint-Joseph M (1886) Les annélides polychètes des cotes de Dinard. Annales Des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie 9:127–270
Schneider SQ, Bowerman B (2007) β-Catenin asymmetries after all animal/vegetal- oriented cell divisions in Platynereis dumerilii embryos mediate binary cell-fate specification. Dev Cell 13:73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.05.002
Sikes JM, Bely AE (2010) Making heads from tails: Development of a reversed anterior–posterior axis during budding in an acoel. Dev Biol 338:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.033
Smith F (1896) Notes on species of North American Oligochaeta. II. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull 4:396–413
Stephenson J (1911) On some aquatic Oligochaeta in the collection of the Indian Museum. Rec Indian Museum 6:203–214
Zattara EE (2020) Axial regeneration in segmented animals: a post-embryonic reboot of the segmentation process. In: Cellular Processes in Segmentation, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 255–292
Žídek R, Machoň O, Kozmik Z (2018) Wnt/β-catenin signalling is necessary for gut differentiation in a marine annelid Platynereis Dumerilii. Evodevo 9:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-018-0100-7
Funding
RPR was supported by the fellowship program “Contratos predoctorales para Formación de Personal Investigador, FPI-UAM” (Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain). This study was carried out within the project “Macroevolutionary transitions in Syllidae” CGL2015-63593-P supported by MINECO/ERDF, European Union funding, PI: MTA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Mark Q. Martindale.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ribeiro, R.P., Aguado, M.T. Effects of GSK3β inhibition in the regeneration of Syllis malaquini (Syllidae, Annelida). Dev Genes Evol 231, 141–146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-021-00681-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-021-00681-0