Skip to main content
Log in

An innovative unification process for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements and its application to decision making

  • Published:
Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element (PHFE) is a worthwhile extension of hesitant fuzzy element (HFE) which is a means of allowing the decision makers more flexibility in expressing their preferences by the use of hesitant information in practical decision making process. To derive a more realistic expression of decision information, it is necessary to unify the arrangement of elements in PHFEs without imposing artificial elements. Up to now, several processes concerning the unification and arrangement of elements in PHFEs have been proposed, and while, most suffer from different drawbacks being critically discussed in the present study. The main aim of this study is to propose a PHFE unification process which does not have the shortcomings of existing processes, and does not change the inherent characteristic of PHFE probabilities. Based on the proposed unification process, the current study seeks to extend the theory of arithmetic operations on PHFEs by proposing and developing novel types of PHFS division and subtraction. Finally, the proposed PHFE unification process is applied to a number of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems for illustrating its vast range of applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

H :

Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS)

h :

Hesitant fuzzy element (HFE)

\(\hbar \) :

The element of h

\({{}^\wp {H}}\) :

Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set (PHFS)

\({}^\wp {h}\) :

Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy element (PHFE)

\(\langle {\hbar }(x) ,\wp (x)\rangle \) :

The element of \({}^\wp {h}\)

References

  • Ding, J., Xu, Z., & Zhao, N. (2017). An interactive approach to probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making with incomplete weight information. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32, 2523–2536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia, B. (2015). Study on division and subtraction operations for hesitant fuzzy sets, interval-valued hesitant fuzzy sets and typical dual hesitant fuzzy sets. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 28, 1393–1402.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia, B., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2019). Sorting of decision-making methods based on their outcomes using dominance-vector hesitant fuzzy-based distance. Soft Computing, 23, 1109–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia, B., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2020). A modification of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets and its application to multiple criteria decision making. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy System, 17, 151–166.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia, B., & Xu, Z. (2018). Novel hesitant fuzzy linguistic entropy and cross-entropy measures in multiple criteria decision making. Applied Intelligence, 18, 3915–3927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farhadinia, B., & Xu, Z. (2017). Distance and aggregation-based methodologies for hesitant fuzzy decision making. Cognitive Computation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-016-9436-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., & Xu, Z. (2019). Multi-attribute decision making methods based on reference ideal theory with probabilistic hesitant information. Expert Systems with Applications, 118, 459–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F., & Ma, Q. (2018). Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiency. Applied Intelligence, 48, 953–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Chen, Q. (2020). An outranking method for multicriteria decision making with probabilistic hesitant information. Expert System. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Chen, Q., Niu, L., & Wang, Z. (2020). An ORESTE approach for multi-criteria decision-making with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-020-01060-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Wang, Z. (2019). Multi-attribute decision making based on prioritized operators under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environments. Soft Computing, 23, 3853–3868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0310-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, H., Mi, X., & Xu, Z. (2020). A survey of decision-making methods with probabilistic linguistic information: Bibliometrics, preliminaries, methodologies, applications and future directions. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 19, 81–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, S., & Liu, J. (2020). Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projects. Economic Research-Ekonomska, 33, 672–697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mi, X., Liao, H., Wu, X., & Xu, Z. (2020). Probabilistic linguistic information fusion: A survey on aggregation operators in terms of principles, definitions, classifications, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 1–28.

  • Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156, 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Science, 369, 128–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019). Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica, 30, 391–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, C., Xu, Z., & Zhao, H. (2018). A novel comparison of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements in multi-criteria decision making. Symmetry, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10050177.

  • Torra, V. (2010). Hesitant fuzzy sets. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, 529–539.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Liao, H., Xu, Z., Hafezalkotob, A., & Herrera, F. (2018). Probabilistic linguistic MULTIMOORA: A multicriteria decision making method based on the probabilistic linguistic expectation function and the improved Borda rule. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 26, 3688–3702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Wu, C. (2014). Weighted hesitant fuzzy sets and their application to multi-criteria decision making. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 4, 1091–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Xu, Z., & He, Y. (2017). Operations and integrations of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information in decision making. Information Fusion, 38, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, B. (2014). Decision method for research and application based on preference relation. Southeast University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahram Farhadinia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farhadinia, B. An innovative unification process for probabilistic hesitant fuzzy elements and its application to decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 21, 335–382 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09369-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-021-09369-6

Keywords

Navigation