Functional Diversification of Chromatin on Rapid Evolutionary Timescales

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Akera T, Trimm E, Lampson MA 2019. Molecular strategies of meiotic cheating by selfish centromeres. Cell 178:1132–44.e10
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Allshire RC, Madhani HD. 2018. Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19:229–44
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Bachtrog D. 2013. Y-chromosome evolution: emerging insights into processes of Y-chromosome degeneration. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:113–24
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Barbash DA, Siino DF, Tarone AM, Roote J. 2003. A rapidly evolving MYB-related protein causes species isolation in Drosophila. PNAS 100:5302–7
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Bayes JJ, Malik HS. 2009. Altered heterochromatin binding by a hybrid sterility protein in Drosophila sibling species. Science 326:1538–41
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Beilstein MA, Renfrew KB, Song X, Shakirov EV, Zanis MJ, Shippen DE. 2015. Evolution of the telomere-associated protein POT1a in Arabidopsis thaliana is characterized by positive selection to reinforce protein–protein interaction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32:1329–41
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Biessmann H, Mason JM, Ferry K, d'Hulst M, Valgeirsdottir K et al. 1990. Addition of telomere-associated HeT DNA sequences “heals” broken chromosome ends in Drosophila. Cell 61:663–73
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Blumenstiel JP, Erwin AA, Hemmer LW. 2016. What drives positive selection in the Drosophila piRNA machinery? The genomic autoimmunity hypothesis. Yale J. Biol. Med. 89:499–512
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Blumenstiel JP, Hartl DL, Lozovsky ER. 2002. Patterns of insertion and deletion in contrasting chromatin domains. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2211–25
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Bosco G, Campbell P, Leiva-Neto JT, Markow TA. 2007. Analysis of Drosophila species genome size and satellite DNA content reveals significant differences among strains as well as between species. Genetics 177:1277–90
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Brendel V, Kurtz S, Walbot V. 2002. Comparative genomics of Arabidopsis and maize: prospects and limitations. Genome Biol. 3:reviews1005.1
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Brennecke J, Aravin AA, Stark A, Dus M, Kellis M et al. 2007. Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell 128:1089–103
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Brideau NJ, Flores HA, Wang J, Maheshwari S, Wang X, Barbash DA 2006. Two Dobzhansky-Muller genes interact to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. Science 314:1292–95
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Britten RJ, Kohne DE. 1968. Repeated sequences in DNA. Science 161:529–40
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Burt A, Trivers R. 2009. Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
16. 16. 

    Cechova M, Harris RS, Tomaszkiewicz M, Arbeithuber B, Chiaromonte F, Makova KD 2019. High satellite repeat turnover in great apes studied with short- and long-read technologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36:2415–31
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Cenci G, Siriaco G, Raffa GD, Kellum R, Gatti M. 2003. The Drosophila HOAP protein is required for telomere capping. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:82–84
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Chakraborty M, Chang C-H, Khost DE, Vedanayagam J, Adrion JR et al. 2021. Evolution of genome structure in the Drosophila simulans species complex. Genome Res. 31:380–96
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W. 1994. The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 371:215–20
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Chastain M, Zhou Q, Shiva O, Fadri-Moskwik M, Whitmore L et al. 2016. Human CST facilitates genome-wide RAD51 recruitment to GC-rich repetitive sequences in response to replication stress. Cell Rep 16:1300–14
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Chiolo I, Minoda A, Colmenares SU, Polyzos A, Costes SV, Karpen GH. 2011. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 144:732–44
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Chmátal L, Gabriel SI, Mitsainas GP, Martínez-Vargas J, Ventura J et al. 2014. Centromere strength provides the cell biological basis for meiotic drive and karyotype evolution in mice. Curr. Biol. 24:2295–300
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Comptour A, Moretti C, Serrentino M-E, Auer J, Ialy-Radio C et al. 2014. SSTY proteins co-localize with the post-meiotic sex chromatin and interact with regulators of its expression. FEBS J 281:1571–84
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Cooper JL, Henikoff S. 2004. Adaptive evolution of the histone fold domain in centromeric histones. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1712–18
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Dapper AL, Payseur BA. 2019. Molecular evolution of the meiotic recombination pathway in mammals. Evolution 73:2368–89
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Daugherty MD, Malik HS. 2012. Rules of engagement: molecular insights from host-virus arms races. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46:677–700
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Dernburg AF, Sedat JW, Hawley RS. 1996. Direct evidence of a role for heterochromatin in meiotic chromosome segregation. Cell 86:135–46
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Dimitri P, Junakovic N 1999. Revising the selfish DNA hypothesis: new evidence on accumulation of transposable elements in heterochromatin. Trends Genet 15:123–24
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Dubruille R, Orsi GA, Delabaere L, Cortier E, Couble P et al. 2010. Specialization of a Drosophila capping protein essential for the protection of sperm telomeres. Curr. Biol. 20:2090–99
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Ferree PM, Barbash DA. 2009. Species-specific heterochromatin prevents mitotic chromosome segregation to cause hybrid lethality in Drosophila. PLOS Biol 7:e1000234
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Ferree PM, Prasad S. 2012. How can satellite DNA divergence cause reproductive isolation? Let us count the chromosomal ways. Genet. Res. Int. 2012:430136
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Feschotte C, Pritham EJ. 2007. DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41:331–68
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Finseth FR, Nelson TC, Fishman L 2021. Selfish chromosomal drive shapes recent centromeric histone evolution in monkeyflowers. PLOS Genet. 17:e1009418
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Fishman L, Saunders A. 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322:1559–62
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Gao G, Cheng Y, Wesolowska N, Rong YS 2011. Paternal imprint essential for the inheritance of telomere identity in Drosophila. PNAS 108:4932–37
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Garrido-Ramos MA. 2017. Satellite DNA: an evolving topic. Genes 8:230
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Gibeaux R, Acker R, Kitaoka M, Georgiou G, van Kruijsbergen I et al. 2018. Paternal chromosome loss and metabolic crisis contribute to hybrid inviability in Xenopus. Nature 553:337–41
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Gómez-Rodríguez M, Jansen LET. 2013. Basic properties of epigenetic systems: lessons from the centromere. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23:219–27
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Greider CW, Blackburn EH. 1985. Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts. Cell 43:405–13
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Gunawardane LS, Saito K, Nishida KM, Miyoshi K, Kawamura Y et al. 2007. A slicer-mediated mechanism for repeat-associated siRNA 5' end formation in Drosophila. Science 315:1587–90
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Hall AE, Kettler GC, Preuss D. 2006. Dynamic evolution at pericentromeres. Genome Res 16:355–64
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Hathaway NA, Bell O, Hodges C, Miller EL, Neel DS, Crabtree GR 2012. Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells. Cell 149:1447–60
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Heitz E. 1928. Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb Wiss Botanik 69:762–818
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Helleu Q, Gérard PR, Dubruille R, Ogereau D, Prud'homme B et al. 2016. Rapid evolution of a Y-chromosome heterochromatin protein underlies sex chromosome meiotic drive. PNAS 113:4110–15
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Henikoff S, Ahmad K, Malik HS 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098–102
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Hosaka A, Saito R, Takashima K, Sasaki T, Fu Y et al. 2017. Evolution of sequence-specific anti-silencing systems in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 8:2161
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Iwata-Otsubo A, Dawicki-McKenna JM, Akera T, Falk SJ, Chmátal L et al. 2017. Expanded satellite repeats amplify a discrete CENP-A nucleosome assembly site on chromosomes that drive in female meiosis. Curr. Biol. 27:2365–73.e8
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Janssen A, Colmenares SU, Karpen GH. 2018. Heterochromatin: guardian of the genome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34:265–88
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Kasinathan B, Colmenares SU III, McConnell H, Young JM, Karpen GH, Malik HS 2020. Innovation of heterochromatin functions drives rapid evolution of essential ZAD-ZNF genes in Drosophila. eLife 9:e63368
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Kelleher ES. 2021. Protein–protein interactions shape genomic autoimmunity in the adaptively evolving Rhino-Deadlock-Cutoff complex. Genome Biol. Evol 13:evab132
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Kelleher ES, Barbash DA, Blumenstiel JP. 2020. Taming the turmoil within: new insights on the containment of transposable elements. Trends Genet 36:474–89
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    King TD, Leonard CJ, Cooper JC, Nguyen S, Joyce EF, Phadnis N 2019. Recurrent losses and rapid evolution of the condensin II complex in insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36:2195–204
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Klattenhoff C, Xi H, Li C, Lee S, Xu J et al. 2009. The Drosophila HP1 homolog Rhino is required for transposon silencing and piRNA production by dual-strand clusters. Cell 138:1137–49
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Kumon T, Ma J, Akins RB, Stefanik D, Nordgren EDet al 2021. Parallel pathways for recruiting effector proteins determine centromere drive and suppression. Cell 184:4904–18.e11
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Kursel LE, Malik HS. 2017. Recurrent gene duplication leads to diverse repertoires of centromeric histones in Drosophila species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:1445–62
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Kursel LE, Welsh FC, Malik HS 2020. Ancient coretention of paralogs of Cid centromeric histones and Cal1 chaperones in mosquito species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37:1949–63
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Lee YCG, Karpen GH 2017. Pervasive epigenetic effects of Drosophila euchromatic transposable elements impact their evolution. eLife 6:e25762
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Lee YCG, Leek C, Levine MT. 2017. Recurrent innovation at genes required for telomere integrity in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:467–82
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Lee YCG, Ogiyama Y, Martins NMC, Beliveau BJ, Acevedo D et al. 2020. Pericentromeric heterochromatin is hierarchically organized and spatially contacts H3K9me2 islands in euchromatin. PLOS Genet 16:e1008673
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Lerat E, Burlet N, Biémont C, Vieira C. 2011. Comparative analysis of transposable elements in the melanogaster subgroup sequenced genomes. Gene 473:100–9
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Levine MT, McCoy C, Vermaak D, Lee YCG, Hiatt MA et al. 2012. Phylogenomic analysis reveals dynamic evolutionary history of the Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) gene family. PLOS Genet 8:e1002729
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Levine MT, Vander Wende HM, Hsieh E, Baker EP, Malik HS. 2016. Recurrent gene duplication diversifies genome defense repertoire in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33:1641–53
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Levine MT, Vander Wende HM, Malik HS 2015. Mitotic fidelity requires transgenerational action of a testis-restricted HP1. eLife 4:e07378
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Levis RW, Ganesan R, Houtchens K, Tolar LA, Sheen FM. 1993. Transposons in place of telomeric repeats at a Drosophila telomere. Cell 75:1083–93
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Lohe AR, Roberts PA. 2000. Evolution of DNA in heterochromatin: the Drosophila melanogaster sibling species subgroup as a resource. Genetica 109:125–30
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Lower SS, McGurk MP, Clark AG, Barbash DA. 2018. Satellite DNA evolution: old ideas, new approaches. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 49:70–78
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Luo S, Zhang H, Duan Y, Yao X, Clark AG, Lu J 2020. The evolutionary arms race between transposable elements and piRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evol. Biol. 20:14
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Maheshwari S, Ishii T, Brown CT, Houben A, Comai L. 2017. Centromere location in Arabidopsis is unaltered by extreme divergence in CENH3 protein sequence. Genome Res 27:471–78
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Maheshwari S, Tan EH, West A, Franklin FCH, Comai L, Chan SWL 2015. Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLOS Genet 11:e1004970
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Malik HS, Henikoff S. 2001. Adaptive evolution of Cid, a centromere-specific histone in Drosophila. Genetics 157:1293–98
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Malik HS, Henikoff S. 2002. Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12:711–18
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Malik HS, Vermaak D, Henikoff S. 2002. Recurrent evolution of DNA-binding motifs in the Drosophila centromeric histone. PNAS 99:1449–54
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    McDonald JH, Kreitman M. 1991. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351:652–54
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    McGurk MP, Dion-Côté A-M, Barbash DA 2021. Rapid evolution at the Drosophila telomere: transposable element dynamics at an intrinsically unstable locus. Genetics 217:iyaa027
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM. 2016. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17:16–29
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Mohn F, Sienski G, Handler D, Brennecke J. 2014. The Rhino-Deadlock-Cutoff complex licenses noncanonical transcription of dual-strand piRNA clusters in Drosophila. Cell 157:1364–79
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Molaro A, Malik HS, Bourc'his D. 2020. Dynamic evolution of de novo DNA methyltransferases in rodent and primate genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37:1882–92
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Nishide K, Hirano T. 2014. Overlapping and non-overlapping functions of condensins I and II in neural stem cell divisions. PLOS Genet 10:e1004847
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Obbard DJ, Maclennan J, Kim K-W, Rambaut A, O'Grady PM, Jiggins FM. 2012. Estimating divergence dates and substitution rates in the Drosophila phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29:3459–73
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Oliveira RA, Coelho PA, Sunkel CE. 2005. The condensin I subunit Barren/CAP-H is essential for the structural integrity of centromeric heterochromatin during mitosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:8971–84
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Padeken J, Zeller P, Gasser SM. 2015. Repeat DNA in genome organization and stability. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 31:12–19
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Palmer DK, O'Day K, Trong HL, Charbonneau H, Margolis RL 1991. Purification of the centromere-specific protein CENP-A and demonstration that it is a distinctive histone. PNAS 88:3734–38
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Pardue M-L, DeBaryshe PG. 2011. Retrotransposons that maintain chromosome ends. PNAS 108:20317–24
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Parhad SS, Tu S, Weng Z, Theurkauf WE 2017. Adaptive evolution leads to cross-species incompatibility in the piRNA transposon silencing machinery. Dev. Cell 43:60–70.e5
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Parhad SS, Yu T, Zhang G, Rice NP, Weng Z, Theurkauf WE 2020. Adaptive evolution targets a piRNA precursor transcription network. Cell Rep 30:2672–85.e5
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Petersen M, Armisén D, Gibbs RA, Hering L, Khila A et al. 2019. Diversity and evolution of the transposable element repertoire in arthropods with particular reference to insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 19:11
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Pontremoli C, Forni D, Cagliani R, Pozzoli U, Clerici M, Sironi M 2018. Evolutionary rates of mammalian telomere-stability genes correlate with karyotype features and female germline expression. Nucleic Acids Res 46:7153–68
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Pontremoli C, Forni D, Pozzoli U, Clerici M, Cagliani R, Sironi M 2021. Kinetochore proteins and microtubule-destabilizing factors are fast evolving in eutherian mammals. Mol. Ecol. 30:1505–15
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Presgraves DC. 2010. The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:175–80
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Presgraves DC, Stephan W. 2007. Pervasive adaptive evolution among interactors of the Drosophila hybrid inviability gene, Nup96. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:306–14
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Ravi M, Kwong PN, Menorca RMG, Valencia JT, Ramahi JS et al. 2010. The rapidly evolving centromere-specific histone has stringent functional requirements in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 186:461–71
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Rošić S, Köhler F, Erhardt S. 2014. Repetitive centromeric satellite RNA is essential for kinetochore formation and cell division. J. Cell Biol. 207:335–49
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Ross BD, Rosin L, Thomae AW, Hiatt MA, Vermaak D et al. 2013. Stepwise evolution of essential centromere function in a Drosophila neogene. Science 340:1211–14
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Saint-Leandre B, Christopher C, Levine MT 2020. Adaptive evolution of an essential telomere protein restricts telomeric retrotransposons. eLife 9:e60987
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Saint-Leandre B, Levine MT. 2020. The telomere paradox: stable genome preservation with rapidly evolving proteins. Trends Genet 36:232–42
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Saint-Leandre B, Nguyen SC, Levine MT. 2019. Diversification and collapse of a telomere elongation mechanism. Genome Res 29:920–31
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Satyaki PRV, Cuykendall TN, Wei KHC, Brideau NJ, Kwak H et al. 2014. The Hmr and Lhr hybrid incompatibility genes suppress a broad range of heterochromatic repeats. PLOS Genet 10:e1004240
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Sawamura K. 2012. Chromatin evolution and molecular drive in speciation. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2012:301894
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Sawamura K, Fujita A, Yokoyama R, Taira T, Inoue YH et al. 1995. Molecular and genetic dissection of a reproductive isolation gene, zygotic hybrid rescue, of Drosophila melanogaster. Jpn. J. Genet. 70:223–32
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Sawamura K, Maehara K, Mashino S, Kagesawa T, Kajiwara M et al. 2010. Introgression of Drosophila simulans nuclear pore protein 160 in Drosophila melanogaster alone does not cause inviability but does cause female sterility. Genetics 186:669–76
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Schueler MG, Swanson W, Thomas PJ, Program NCS, Green ED. 2010. Adaptive evolution of foundation kinetochore proteins in primates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27:1585–97
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Sproul JS, Khost DE, Eickbush DG, Negm S, Wei X et al. 2020. Dynamic evolution of euchromatic satellites on the X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster and the simulans clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37:2241–56
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Sun S, Ting C-T, Wu C-I. 2004. The normal function of a speciation gene, Odysseus, and its hybrid sterility effect. Science 305:81–83
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Talbert PB, Bryson TD, Henikoff S. 2004. Adaptive evolution of centromere proteins in plants and animals. J. Biol. 3:18
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Talbert PB, Masuelli R, Tyagi AP, Comai L, Henikoff S 2002. Centromeric localization and adaptive evolution of an Arabidopsis histone H3 variant. Plant Cell 14:1053–66
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Tang S, Presgraves DC. 2009. Evolution of the Drosophila nuclear pore complex results in multiple hybrid incompatibilities. Science 323:779–82
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Teixeira JR, Dias GB, Svartman M, Ruiz A, Kuhn GCS. 2018. Concurrent duplication of Drosophila Cid and Cenp-C genes resulted in accelerated evolution and male germline-biased expression of the new copies. J. Mol. Evol. 86:353–64
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Teytelman L, Eisen MB, Rine J. 2008. Silent but not static: accelerated base-pair substitution in silenced chromatin of budding yeasts. PLOS Genet 4:e1000247
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Thomae AW, Schade GOM, Padeken J, Borath M, Vetter I et al. 2013. A pair of centromeric proteins mediates reproductive isolation in Drosophila species. Dev. Cell 27:412–24
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Ting C-T, Tsaur S-C, Sun S, Browne WE, Chen Y-C et al. 2004. Gene duplication and speciation in Drosophila: evidence from the Odysseus locus. PNAS 101:12232–35
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Ting C-T, Tsaur S-C, Wu M-L, Wu C-I. 1998. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science 282:1501–4
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Ugarković D, Plohl M. 2002. Variation in satellite DNA profiles—causes and effects. EMBO J 21:5955–59
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     van de Werken C, van der Heijden GW, Eleveld C, Teeuwssen M, Albert M et al. 2014. Paternal heterochromatin formation in human embryos is H3K9/HP1 directed and primed by sperm-derived histone modifications. Nat. Commun. 5:5868
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     van der Lee R, Wiel L, van Dam TJP, Huynen MA. 2017. Genome-scale detection of positive selection in nine primates predicts human-virus evolutionary conflicts. Nucleic Acids Res 45:10634–48
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115. 

     Vermaak D, Bayes JJ, Malik HS. 2009. A surrogate approach to study the evolution of noncoding DNA elements that organize eukaryotic genomes. J. Hered. 100:624–36
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Vermaak D, Henikoff S, Malik HS 2005. Positive selection drives the evolution of rhino, a member of the heterochromatin protein 1 family in Drosophila. PLOS Genet 1:e9
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Villasante A, Abad JP, Planelló R, Méndez-Lago M, Celniker SE, de Pablos B. 2007. Drosophila telomeric retrotransposons derived from an ancestral element that was recruited to replace telomerase. Genome Res 17:1909–18
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118. 

     Wang N, Dawe RK 2018. Centromere size and its relationship to haploid formation in plants. Mol. Plant 11:398–406
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119. 

     Watanabe Y. 2005. Sister chromatid cohesion along arms and at centromeres. Trends Genet 21:405–12
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Wei KHC, Lower SE, Caldas IV, Sless TJS, Barbash DA, Clark AG. 2018. Variable rates of simple satellite gains across the Drosophila phylogeny. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35:925–41
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Wei KHC, Reddy HM, Rathnam C, Lee J, Lin D et al. 2017. A pooled sequencing approach identifies a candidate meiotic driver in Drosophila. Genetics 206:451–65
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Werren JH. 2011. Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation. PNAS 108:Suppl. 210863–70
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     Yamaki T, Yasuda GK, Wakimoto BT. 2016. The deadbeat paternal effect of uncapped sperm telomeres on cell cycle progression and chromosome behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 203:799–816
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Yang P, Wang Y, Macfarlan TS 2017. The role of KRAB-ZFPs in transposable element repression and mammalian evolution. Trends Genet 33:871–81
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1586–91
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126. 

     Yoshida K, Ishikawa A, Toyoda A, Shigenobu S, Fujiyama A, Kitano J 2019. Functional divergence of a heterochromatin-binding protein during stickleback speciation. Mol. Ecol. 28:1563–78
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Yunis JJ, Yasmineh WG. 1971. Heterochromatin, satellite DNA, and cell function. Science 174:1200–9
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128. 

     Zhang Z, Wang J, Schultz N, Zhang F, Parhad SS et al. 2014. The HP1 homolog Rhino anchors a nuclear complex that suppresses piRNA precursor splicing. Cell 157:1353–63
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129. 

     Zhou Q, Ellison CE, Kaiser VB, Alekseyenko AA, Gorchakov AA, Bachtrog D. 2013. The epigenome of evolving Drosophila neo-sex chromosomes: dosage compensation and heterochromatin formation. PLOS Biol 11:e1001711
     [Google Scholar]