Abstract
Driving simulators are established tools used during automotive development and research. Most simulators use either monitors or projectors as their primary display system. However, the emergence of a new generation of head-mounted displays has triggered interest in using these as the primary display type. The general benefits and drawbacks of head-mounted displays are well researched, but their effect on driving behavior in a simulator has not been sufficiently quantified.
This article presents a study of driving behavior differences between projector-based graphics and head-mounted display in a large dynamic driving simulator. This study has selected five specific driving maneuvers suspected of affecting driving behavior differently depending on the choice of display technology. Some of these maneuvers were chosen to reveal changes in lateral and longitudinal driving behavior. Others were picked for their ability to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of head-mounted displays in a driving context.
The results show minor changes in lateral and longitudinal driver behavior changes when comparing projectors and a head-mounted display. The most noticeable difference in favor of projectors was seen when the display resolution is critical to the driving task. The choice of display type did not affect simulator sickness nor the realism rated by the subjects.
- [1] . 2015. Effect of VR device-HMD and screen display- on the sickness for driving simulation. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 235–236.Google Scholar
- [2] . 2019. Projection displays induce less simulator sickness than head-mounted displays in a real vehicle driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI’19). ACM Press, New York, NY, 379–387.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344515Google ScholarDigital Library - [3] . 2017. Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: A survey. Virt. Real. 21, 1 (
Mar. 2017), 1–17.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0293-9Google ScholarDigital Library - [4] . 2018. Exploring the suitability of virtual reality for driving simulation. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 163–166.Google Scholar
- [5] . 1999. Intersections between driving in reality and virtual reality (VR). In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association,153–164.Google Scholar
- [6] . 2013. Using virtual reality driving simulators in persons with spinal cord injury: Three screen display versus head mounted display. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 8, 2 (
Mar. 2013), 176–180.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2012.699990Google ScholarCross Ref - [7] . 2002. Head-mounted display in driving simulation applications in CARDS. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 33–43.Google Scholar
- [8] . 2016. Motion sickness comparison between a CAVE and a HMD. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 201–206.Google Scholar
- [9] . 2012. Evaluation of methods for measuring speed perception in a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 1–16.Google Scholar
- [10] . 2000. Head tracking relative to a moving vehicle or simulator platform using differential inertial sensors. In Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays V, International Society for Optics and Photonics. SPIE, 133–144.
DOI: 10.1117/12.389141Google Scholar - [11] . 1988. Effects of visual display and motion system delays on operator performance and uneasiness in a driving simulator. Hum. Factors 30, 2 (1988), 201–217.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088803000207Google ScholarDigital Library - [12] . 2013. Virtual reality HMD for the test of ADAS system. In Future Active Safety Technology toward Zero Traffic Accidents. Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
- [13] . 2010. Influence of display type on drivers’ performance in a motion-based driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 81–88.Google Scholar
- [14] . 2002. Simulating self-motion I: Cues for the perception of motion. Virt. Real. 6, 2 (
Sep. 2002), 75–85.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s100550200008Google ScholarCross Ref - [15] . 2019. Influence of vestibular cues in head-mounted display-based driving simulators. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 25–32.Google Scholar
- [16] . 2012. Scene-motion thresholds during head yaw for immersive virtual environments. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 9, 1 (
Mar. 2012), 1–23.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2134203.2134207Google ScholarDigital Library - [17] . 2014. From driving simulation to virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2014 Virtual Reality International Conference on (VRIC’14). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1–5.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2617841.2620721Google ScholarDigital Library - [18] . 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J Aviat. Psychol. 3, 3 (
Jul. 1993), 203–220.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3Google Scholar - [19] . 2019. Near-Eye display and tracking technologies for virtual and augmented reality. Comput. Graph. Forum 38, 2 (May 2019), 493–519.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13654Google ScholarCross Ref - [20] . 2017. Accommodation and comfort in head-mounted displays. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4 (
Jul. 2017), 1–11.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073622Google ScholarDigital Library - [21] . 2018. The Display Resolution of Head-mounted Displays, Revisited. Retrieved January 29, 2020 from http://doc-ok.org/?p=1694.Google Scholar
- [22] . 2017. Comparing tangible and fully virtual haptic systems for HMI studies in driving situations. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 163–166.Google Scholar
- [23] . 2020. Stationäre Messung der Bildqualität von HMDs.
Technical Report 10. Virtual Dimension Center, Fellbach.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13275062Google Scholar - [24] . 2020. Head-Mounted Displays: Messung Des Sichtfelds.
Technical Report 8. Virtual Dimension Center, Fellbach.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13200149Google Scholar - [25] . 2004. The new VTI driving simulator - multi purpose moving base with high performance linear motion. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 45–55.Google Scholar
- [26] . 2001. Speed and safety distance control in truck driving: Comparison of simulation and real-world environment. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 91–107.Google Scholar
- [27] . 2006. Perceptual issues in the use of head-mounted visual displays. Hum. Factors 48, 3 (
Sep. 2006), 555–573.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1518/001872006778606877Google ScholarCross Ref - [28] . 1975. Motion Sickness. Academic Press.Google Scholar
- [29] . 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments—A review. Comput. Surv. 46, 212 (2013), 1–40.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2543581.2543590Google ScholarDigital Library - [30] . 2020. Head Mounted Displays: Dynamische Messungen Der Bildqualität.
Technical Report 12. Virtual Dimension Center, Fellbach.DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13352699Google Scholar - [31] . 2019. New high-end visual system for the daimler motion based simulator. In Product Solutions Book of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 67–70.Google Scholar
- [32] . 1997. Car research using virtual reality at daimler-benz. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 35–43.Google Scholar
- [33] . 2013. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32009L0112.Google Scholar
- [34] . 1998. Navigating through a virtual city: Using virtual reality technology to study human action and perception. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 14, 3–4 (1998), 231–242.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-739x(98)00027-2Google ScholarCross Ref - [35] . 1988. Visual acuity measurement standard. Ital. J. Ophthalmol. II/I (1988), 1–15.Google Scholar
- [36] . 2017. Comparing VR and non-VR driving simulations: An experimental user study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (VR’17). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 281–282.
DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892286Google ScholarCross Ref - [37] . 2019. Applicability of head-mounted displays in driving simulation. In Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference. Driving Simulation Association, 9–15.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Effects on Driving Behavior When Using a Head-mounted Display in a Dynamic Driving Simulator
Recommendations
Projection Displays Induce Less Simulator Sickness than Head-Mounted Displays in a Real Vehicle Driving Simulator
AutomotiveUI '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsDriving simulators are necessary for evaluating automotive technology for human users. While they can vary in terms of their fidelity, it is essential that users experience minimal simulator sickness and high presence in them. In this paper, we present ...
Head-mounted display with mid-air tactile feedback
VRST '15: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologyVirtual and physical worlds are merging. Currently users of head-mounted displays cannot have unobtrusive tactile feedback while touching virtual objects. We present a mid-air tactile feedback system for head-mounted displays. Our prototype uses the ...
Numerical Analysis of Tractor Accidents using Driving Simulator for Autonomous Driving Tractor
ICMRE'19: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics EngineeringAutonomous driving of automobiles is a hot research topic in recent years. The autonomous driving tractor also has been studied in the agricultural field as well as an autonomous driving automobile. On the other hand, tractor accidents frequently occur ...
Comments