Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:35:58.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Good, Actually: Aristotelian Metaphysics and the ‘Guise of the Good’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2022

Adam M. Willows
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper I argue that both defence and criticism of the claim that humans act ‘under the guise of the good’ neglects the metaphysical roots of the theory. I begin with an overview of the theory and its modern commentators, with critics noting the apparent possibility of acting against the good, and supporters claiming that such actions are instances of error.

These debates reduce the ‘guise of the good’ to a claim about intention and moral action, and in so doing have become divorced from the theory's roots in classical and medieval philosophy. Aristotle and Aquinas’ ‘guise of the good’ is primarily a metaphysical claim resting on the equivalence between actuality and goodness, from which conclusions about moral action are derived. I show the reasoning behind their theory and how it forms the basis for the claims about intention and action at the centre of the modern debate. Finally, I argue that the absence of its original foundation is apparent in recent attacks on the ‘guise of the good’. It is unsurprising that modern action theory and ethics have not always been able to comfortably accommodate the ‘guise of the good’; they are only telling half of the story.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy , Volume 97 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 187 - 205
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M., Intention, 2nd edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Aristotle's De Anima, ed. by Kenny, Joseph, O.P., trans. by Foster, Kenelm, O.P. and Humphries, Sylvester, O.P. (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1951) <https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/DeAnima.htm>.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by Litzinger, C. I., O.P. (Chicago: Henry Regerny, 1964) <https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/Ethics.htm>Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, De Ente et Essentia, ed. & trans. by Joseph Kenny, O.P., 1965 <https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/DeEnte&Essentia.htm> [accessed 2 December 2021]Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Questiones Disputatae de Veritate, ed. by Kenny, Joseph, O.P., trans. by Mulligan, R. W., S. J., McGlynn, James V., S.J., and Schmidt, Robert W., S. J. (Chicago: Henry Regerny, 1954) <https://isidore.co/aquinas/english/QDdeVer.htm>Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Contra Gentiles, trans. by O'Neil, Charles J. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975)Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae, ed. by Mortensen, John and Alarcón, Enrique, trans. by Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Latin/English Edition of the Works of St. Thomas Aquinas, Volume 13-20, 8 vols (Lander, WY: The Aquinas Institute for the Study of Sacred Doctrine, 2012)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘Eudemian Ethics’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Solomon, J., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), ii, 1922–81.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘Metaphysics’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Ross, W. D., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), ii, 1552–1728.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘Nicomachean ethics’, in The complete works of Aristotle: the revised Oxford translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Ross, W. D., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), ii, 1729–1867.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘On the Heavens’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Stocks, J. L., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), i, 447–511.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘On the Soul’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Smith, J. A., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), i, 641–92.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , ‘Physics’, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation., ed. by Barnes, Jonathan, trans. by Hardie, R. P. and Gaye, R. K., 2 vols (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995), i, 315–446.Google Scholar
Baker, Samuel, ‘The Metaphysics of Goodness in the Ethics of Aristotle’, Philosophical Studies, 174.7 (2017), 1839–56 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0824-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, Michael E., ‘Shared Intention’, Ethics, 104.1 (1993), 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald, ‘Actions, Reasons, and Causes’, The Journal of Philosophy, 60.23 (1963), 685–700 https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P., Aristotle and Other Platonists (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Gregory, Alex, ‘The Guise of Reasons’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 50.1 (2013), 63–72.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. by Oakeshott, Michael and Peters, Richard (New York: Collier, 1962).Google Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. by Mossner, Ernest C., Penguin Classics (London: Penguin, 1984).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. & trans. by Gregor, Mary J., Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, L. A., ‘Aristotle's Definition of Motion’, Phronesis, 14.1 (1969), 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen, ‘The Origins of Aristotle's Concept of Ένέργɛια Ένέργɛια and Δύναμις’, Ancient Philosophy, 14.1 (1994), 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, ‘Utilitarianism’, in The Basic Writings of John Stuart Mill (New York: Modern Library, 2002).Google Scholar
Mirus, Christopher V., ‘Aristotle's “Agathon”’, The Review of Metaphysics, 57.3 (2004), 515–36.Google Scholar
Oliver, Simon, Philosophy, God and Motion (Oxford: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Plato, Protagoras, trans. by Lombardo, Stanley and Bell, Karen, 4th edn (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
Saemi, Amir, ‘Aiming at the Good’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45.2 (2015), 197–219 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1054230>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saemi, Amir, ‘Self-Knowledge and the Guise of the Good’, Analytic Philosophy, 58.3 (2017), 272–81 https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Setiya, Kieran, ‘Sympathy for the Devil’, in Desire, Practical Reason and the Good, by Tenenbaum, Sergio (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, Michael, ‘Desiring the Bad: An Essay in Moral Psychology’, The Journal of Philosophy, 76.12 (1979), 738–53 https://doi.org/10.2307/2025856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sussman, David, ‘For Badness’ Sake’, The Journal of Philosophy, 106.11 (2009), 613–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David J., ‘The Guise of the Good’, Noûs, 26.1 (1992), 3–26 <https://doi.org/10.2307/2215684>.CrossRefGoogle Scholar