Skip to main content
Log in

Novel cluster partitioning models for visible light communication networks

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Photonic Network Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of clustering nodes in a wireless visible light communication (VLC) network while simultaneously forming a spanning tree backbone. More precisely, let \(G=(V,E)\) be a complete Euclidean input graph instance with a set of wireless node devices V and connection links E representing the VLC network. We consider the problem of partitioning \(k \le |V|\) nodes into disjoint cliques of the size of at most \(\lfloor \frac{k}{t}\rfloor +1\) nodes where \(t \le k\) \((k, t \in \mathbb {Z}_+)\) in such a way that a unique vertex of each clique is used to form a spanning tree backbone. The underlying idea is to form clusters of nodes while simultaneously providing connectivity between them. Thus, we maximize the total power received and total residual energy of the k chosen nodes of the network for such a structure. We also consider the simplified version of the problem in which no backbone structure is required. Recall that clustering the nodes of a wireless network allows handling efficiently problems related to scalability and routing. In order to achieve the grouping task optimally, we propose mixed-integer linear and quadratic programming models based on classical combinatorial optimization problems. In order to compare our proposed models, we assume that every node in the network can communicate through a direct-line-of-sight VLC channel. Our numerical results indicate that the linearized quadratic models are preferable as they allow solving to optimality most of the tested instances and in less computational effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Adasme, P., Seguel, F., Dehghan, Firoozabadi, A.: On a clustering partitioning approach for wireless visible light communication networks. In: 2020 IEEE Latin-American Conference on Communications (LATINCOM), pp. 1–6, (2020). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9282330

  2. Adasme, P., Dehghan, F.A.: Degree-constrained k -minimum spanning tree problem. Complex 2020, 7628105:1-7628105:25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7628105

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Adasme, P., Dehghan, F.A.: Facility location with tree topology and radial distance constraints. Complex 2019, 9723718:1-9723718:29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9723718

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Adasme, P.: p-Median based formulations with backbone facility locations. Appl. Soft Comput. 67, 261–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adasme, P., Andrade, R., Leung, J., Lisser, A.: Improved solution strategies for dominating trees. Expert Syst. Appl. 100, 30–40 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Adasme, P.: Optimal sub-tree scheduling for wireless sensor networks with partial coverage. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 61, 20–35 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adasme, P.: Visible light communication networks under ring and tree topology constraints. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 52, 10–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adasme, P., Andrade, R., Lisser, A.: Minimum cost dominating tree sensor networks under probabilistic constraints. Comput. Netw. 112, 208–222 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biswas, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V., Sithirasenan, E.: Maximal clique based clustering scheme for wireless sensor networks. In: 2013 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 237–241 (2013). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6529795

  10. Biswas, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V., Sithirasenan, E., Usman, M.: An energy efficient clique based clustering and routing mechanism in wireless sensor networks. In: 2013 9th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), Sardinia, pp. 171–176 (2013). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6583554

  11. Chu, D., Deshpande, A., Hellerstein, J., M., Hong, W.: Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models. In: 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’06), Atlanta, USA, (2006). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1617416

  12. https://docs.anaconda.com/

  13. Fortet, R.: Applications de lálgebre de boole en recherche operationelle. Revue Francaise d’Automatique, d’Informatique et de Recherche operationelle. 4, 17–26 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghassemlooy, Z., Popoola, W., Rajbhandari, S.: Optical Wireless Communications: System and Channel Modelling with MATLAB. CRC Press, Inc., (2013)

  15. https://www.gurobi.com/

  16. Melouki, Y., Omari, M.: Simulated annealing approach for clustering in wireless sensor networks. In: 2020 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Information Technology (ICMIT), pp. 18–19 (2020). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9047029

  17. Oosten, M., Rutten, J., Spieksma, F.: The clique partitioning problem: facets and patching facets. Networks 38, 209–226 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/net.10004

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Stankovic, J., Wood, A., He, T.: Realistic applications for wireless sensor networks. In: Nikoletseas, S., Rolim, J. (eds.) Theoretical Aspects of Distributed Computing in Sensor Networks. Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. An EATCS Series. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14849-1_25

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Tosun, M., Dagdeviren, O.: New heuristic methods for balanced clustering problem in wireless sensor networks. In: 2019 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Samsun, Turkey, (2019). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8907134

  20. Weitz, R., Lakshminarayanan, S.: An empirical comparison of heuristic methods for creating maximally diverse groups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49, 635–646 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600510

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, Y., Shi, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Huang, X., Chi, N.: Maximization of visible light communication capacity employing quasi-linear preequalization with peak power limitation. Math. Probl. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6902152

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Projects: ANID/FONDECYT No. 11180107, ANID/FONDECYT Post doctorado No. 3190147 and ANID/STIC AMSUD 19-STIC-08.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Adasme.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adasme, P., Seguel, F. & Dehghan Firoozabadi, A. Novel cluster partitioning models for visible light communication networks. Photon Netw Commun 43, 3–12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-022-00963-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11107-022-00963-1

Keywords

Navigation