Abstract
Much of the twentieth century debate regarding economics revolved around the contested roles of the state and the market. The outcome of this debate largely deprived economics of the moral compass that was once one of its hallmarks. In this regard, Sen made a significant contribution in placing ethics back into the theory of economics by focusing his work on the long-neglected relationship between the two subjects and challenging the philosophical foundations of traditional economic theory, arguing that although, in principle, economic behaviour and moral disposition might be separated, in practice, both are deeply intertwined. Ethical concerns inevitably infiltrate even a good deal of positive and normative economics. In recent years, there has been a call from within economics to humanize economics by reviving its ethical tradition. Consequently, the moral dimensions of economic life are now subject to reflection and constant negotiation. This reinterpretation may deal with overall economic relations or it could be related to one specific aspect. The former focuses on reviving the economic system as a whole while the latter aims to improve the system by focusing on existing limitations. In examining the relationship between economics and philosophy, this paper draws on one of the principal areas of Sen’s economic research, the capability approach, to explore how Sen’s ethical philosophy delineates engagement between economics and moral philosophy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkire, S. (2005). Valuing freedoms. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, J. M. (2008). Capabilities and social justice: The political philosophy of Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum. London, UK: Routledge.
Anderson, E. (1999). What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109(2), 287–337.
Cohen, G. A. (1993). Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and capabilities. In: M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (eds.), The quality of life, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Dowding, K. (2006). Can capabilities reconcile freedom and equality? Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 323–336.
Drydik, J. (2012). A capability approach to justice as a virtue. Ethic, Theory, Moral Practice, 15, 23–38.
Eiffe, F. F. (2010). Amartya Sen reading Adam Smith. History of Economics Review, 51(1), 1–23.
Hands, D. (2001). Reflection without rules: Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridged, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hedoin, C. (2018). Philosophy and economics recent issues and perspective: Introduction to the special issue. Revue D’economie Politique, 128(2), 177–189.
Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy. London, UK: John W. Parker, West Strand.
Mill, J. S. (1950/1874). A system of logic. New York, NY: Macmillan Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2), 33–59.
Pogge, T. (2002). Can the capability approach be justified? Philosophical Topics, 30(2), 167–228.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Robeyns, I. (2000). An unworkable idea or a promising alternative? Sen’s capability approach re-examined, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Center for Economic Studies Discussions Paper Series (DPS), Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.571.9921&rep=rep1&type=pdf Accessed 8 Feb 2022.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2), 61–92.
Robeyns, I. (2005). Selecting capabilities for quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74(1), 191–215.
Ross, D. (2005). Economic theory and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sen, A. (1979). Utilitarianism and welfarism. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(9), 463–489.
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
Sen, A. (1987). On ethics and economics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2000). Consequential evaluation and practical reason. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(9), 477–502.
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: The illusion of destiny. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (2010). Adam Smith and the contemporary world. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 3(1), 50–67.
Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London, UK: John W. Parker, West Strand.
Smith, A. 1976 [1776]. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Sugden, R. (2006). What we desire, what we have reason to desire, whatever we might desire: Mill and Sen on the value of opportunity. Utilitas, 18(1), 33–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naz, F. Amartya Sen and the Revival of Ethical Tradition in Economics. Atl Econ J 49, 393–402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09737-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-022-09737-6