Abstract
Initially introduced in the field of informatics, an auditory icon consists of a short sound that is present in everyday life, used to represent a specific event, object, function, or action. Auditory icons have been studied in various fields, and overall, compared to other types of auditory alarms, they can be very efficient in informing the listener about a situation or event. So far, auditory icons have been used with a wide range of durations, ranging from a few hundreds of milliseconds up to several seconds. Still little is known, however, about whether and how icon duration influences its interpretation. In the present study, we therefore asked listeners to rate 12 auditory icons, divided into four different sound categories (nonverbal human sounds, machine sounds, human activities, and animal vocalizations), in five different durations (200, 400, 800, 1,600, and 3,200 ms). They rated (1) how appropriately the icon sound itself represented the icon's referent and (2) how appropriately each duration of the icon sound represented the icon's referent. Overall, results demonstrate that the duration of the auditory icons in this stimulus set can directly affect how the icon represents the referent. Auditory icons in the test set characterized by human activities represented their referent most appropriately in a relatively shorter duration (400 or 800 ms). The majority of the auditory icons in the set consisting of machine sounds, nonverbal human sounds, and animal vocalizations, however, were considered as more appropriately representing their referent in longer durations (800 ms and 1,600 ms). Further systematic research is necessary to determine whether the duration effects shown here may generalize to other stimulus sets.
- [1] Arbernaut (pseud.). 2018. “Male laughter.” Free Sound, audio, 00:29:550. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/arbernaut/sounds/450528/.Google Scholar
- [2] 1987. Interpreting the language of environmental sounds. Environ. Behav. 19, 1 (1987), 91–114. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [3] . 1993. Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perf. 19, 2 (1993), 250–267.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [4] . 2019. Auditory icons: Design and physical characteristics. Appl. Ergon. 78 (2019), 224–239. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [5] . 1977. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, New York, NY. (1977).Google Scholar
- [6] Drotzruhn (pseud.). 2017. “Cough.” Free Sound, audio, 00:29:930. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/drotzruhn/sounds/405206/.Google Scholar
- [7] . 2006. Auditory warnings. In International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors, 2nd ed. Waldemar Karwowski (Ed.). Taylor & Francis, London, 1026–1028.Google Scholar
- [8] . 1996. Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: Effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology 33, 4 (1996), 462–475.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [9] . 2008. Auditory display as a tool for teaching network intrusion detection. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 3, 2 (2008), 59–62.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [10] . 2009. Auditory icon and earcon mobile service notifications: Intuitiveness, learnability, memorability and preference. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, 1513–1522.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [11] . 1986. Auditory icons: Using sound in computer interfaces. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2, 2 (1986), 167–177. Google ScholarDigital Library
- [12] . 1989. The sonicfinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 4, 1 (1989), 67–94.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [13] 1993. What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. J. Ecol. Psychol. 5, 1 (1993), 1–29.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [14] . 1976. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (2nd ed.). Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ. (1976).Google Scholar
- [15] . 1999. Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: Evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. Ergonomics 42, 9 (1999), 1233–1248. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [16] . 2004. Spectral–temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115, 3 (2004), 1252–1265.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [17] . 2011. Interactive auditory display to support situational awareness in video surveillance. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Auditory Display. 156–163.Google Scholar
- [18] . 2016. Semantic congruency of auditory warnings. Ergonomics. 60 7 (2016), 1014–1023. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [19] InspectorJ (pseud.). 2017. “Construction, jackhammer excavator.” Free Sound, audio, 00:16:767. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/InspectorJ/sounds/400991/.Google Scholar
- [20] Jgrzinich (pseud.). 2013. “Frog Pond.” Free Sound, audio, 04:41:272. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/jgrzinich/sounds/199285/.Google Scholar
- [21] . 2004. Meaning from environmental sounds: types of signal-referent relations and their effect on recognizing auditory icons. J. Exp. Psychol: Appl. 10, 1 (2004), 3–12. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [22] KieranKeegan (pseud.). 2018. “Lawnmower_idle_close.” Free Sound, audio, 00:30:912. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/KieranKeegan/sounds/431477/.Google Scholar
- [23] . 1997. Learning and retention of auditory warnings. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Auditory Display. 129–133. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/50748.Google Scholar
- [24] . 2000. Confrontation naming of environmental sounds. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 22, 6 (2000), 830–864. Google ScholarCross Ref
- [25] . 2007. Identifying, rating, and remembering environmental sound events. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 3 (2007), 561–569.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [26] Matthews_sounds (pseud.). 2019. “Computer keyboard typing.” Free Sound, audio, 00:22:851. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/matthews_sounds/sounds/468973/.Google Scholar
- [27] . 2007. Mapping candidate within-vehicle auditory display to their references. Hum. Fact. 49, 3 (2007), 417–428.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [28] . 2010. Auditory displays as occasion setters. Hum. Fact. 52, 1 (2010), 54–62.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [29] . 1994. Designing with auditory icons. In Proceedings of the Conference on Auditory Display, 109–119.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [30] . 1997. Transforming graphical interfaces into auditory interfaces for blind users. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 12, 1 (1997), 7–45.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [31] . 2016. Speech auditory alerts promote memory for alerted events in a video-simulated self-driving car ride. Hum. Fact. 58, 3 (2016), 416–426.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [32] . 2007. Cough once for danger: Icons versus abstract warnings as informative alerts in civil aviation. Hum. Fact. 49, 6 (2007), 1061–1071.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [33] Radio_fragola_gorizia (pseud.). 2017. “Chimpanzee2.” Free Sound, audio, 00:13:804. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/Radio_fragola_gorizia/sounds/400084/.Google Scholar
- [34] RSilveira_88 (pseud.). 2014. “Applauses.” Free Sound, audio, 00:19:000. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/RSilveira_88/sounds/216158/.Google Scholar
- [35] . 2009. Designing informative warning signals: Effects of indicator type, modality, and task demand on recognition speed and accuracy. Adv. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 4 (2009), 84–90.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref - [36] Team Audacity. Audacity. Version 2.2.1. Personal computer. 2017. Retrieved from https://www.audacityteam.org/download/windows/.Google Scholar
- [37] Turchinoa (pseud.). 2017. “Paper crumple.” Free Sound, audio, 00:03:552. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/turchinoa/sounds/408391/.Google Scholar
- [38] Vataaa (pseud.). 2012. “Voice elephant.” Free Sound, audio, 00:07:367. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/vataaa/sounds/148873/.Google Scholar
- [39] VithorMoraes (pseud.). 2017. “Flipping pages.” Free Sound, audio, 00:07:616. Retrieved January 13, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/VithorMoraes/sounds/391350/.Google Scholar
- [40] VKProduktion (pseud.). 2016. “A printer printing out a photo—Printer: Canon iP7250.” Free Sound, audio, 01:03:167. Retrieved January 12, 2020 from https://freesound.org/people/VKProduktion/sounds/344971/.Google Scholar
- [41] . 2012. How can we design 3D auditory interfaces which enhance traffic safety for chinese drivers? In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 77–83.
DOI: Google ScholarDigital Library - [42] . 1998. An Investigation of Auditory Icons and Brake Response Times in a Commercial Truck-cab Environment. Master's Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (1998).Google Scholar
- [43] , . 2010. An outdoor navigation aid system for the visually impaired. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM’10). 2435–2439.
DOI: Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The Duration of an Auditory Icon Can Affect How the Listener Interprets Its Meaning
Recommendations
Overview of auditory representations in human-machine interfaces
In recent years, a large number of research projects have focused on the use of auditory representations in a broadened scope of application scenarios. Results in such projects have shown that auditory elements can effectively complement other ...
Graphic-to-Sound Sonification for Visual and Auditory Communication Design
AM '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly ConferenceI designed two sonification platforms designed for visual/auditory communication design studies and audiovisual art. The purpose of this study was to examine whether test participants can associate visuals and sound without any prior training and ...
Vibrotactile stimulation can affect auditory loudness: a pilot study
EuroHaptics'12: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on Haptics: perception, devices, mobility, and communication - Volume Part IIVery few cases have been reported where tactile stimulation affects auditory perception. In this pilot study, we asked volunteers to compare the loudness of combinations of vibrotactile and auditory stimuli. A 50-300 Hz band-limited pink noise signal ...
Comments