Employee Strengths Use and Thriving at Work
The Roles of Self-Efficacy and Perceived Humble Leadership
Abstract
Abstract. This study aimed to investigate the relationship of employee strengths use with thriving at work by proposing a moderated mediation model. Data were collected at two time points, spaced by a 2-week interval. A total of 260 medical staff completed strengths use, perceived humble leadership, self-efficacy, and thriving scales. The results of path analysis showed that strengths use is positively related to thriving, and self-efficacy mediates the relationship of strengths use with thriving. In addition, this study also found perceived humble leadership to positively moderate the direct relationship of strengths use with self-efficacy and the indirect relationship of strengths use with thriving via self-efficacy. This study contributes to a better understanding of how and when strengths use affects thriving.
References
2020). Impact of humble leadership on project success: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and innovative work behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 349–367. 10.1108/LODJ-05-2019-0230
(2018). Strengths use in organizations: A positive approach of occupational health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 59(1), 38–46. 10.1037/cap0000120
(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
. (2018). Managers effectively applying strengths management and emotional intelligence. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(10), 1–5. 10.30845/ijhss.v8n10p1
(2002). The relationship of perceived leadership behaviors to organizational efficacy. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9(2), 65–79. 10.1177/107179190200900206
(1976). Comparative research methodology: Cross-cultural studies. International Journal of Psychology, 11(3), 215–229. 10.1080/00207597608247359
(2009). Trust, connectivity, and thriving: Implications for innovative behaviors at work. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(3), 169–191. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01313.x
(2018). Can leader “humility” spark employee “proactivity”? The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 326–339. 10.1108/LODJ-10-2017-0307
(2020). Exploring the relationship between core self-evaluation and strengths use: The perspective of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 157, 109804. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109804
(2020). Humble leadership affects organizational citizenship behavior: The sequential mediating effect of strengths use and job crafting. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 65. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00065
(2019). Examining the mediating roles of strengths knowledge and strengths use in a 1-year single-session character strength-based cognitive intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(6), 1673–1688. 10.1007/s10902-018-0014-z
(2020). Strengths-based teaching and learning approaches for children: Perceptions and practices. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(4), 31–45. 10.33902/JPR.2020058178
(2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143–153.
(1987). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Macmillan Publishing Company.
(2014). Getting to the “COR”. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364. 10.1177/0149206314527130
(2017). The role of core self-evaluations in explaining depression and work engagement among managers. Current Psychology, 36(3), 516–529. 10.1007/s12144-016-9439-x
(2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. 10.1111/1464-0597.00062
(2011). The Job Demands-Resources model: An analysis of additive and joint effects of demands and resources. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 181–190. 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.12.009
(2017). The German version of the strengths use scale: The relation of using individual strengths and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 637. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00637
(2016). A self-determination perspective of strengths use at work: Examining its determinant and performance implications. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(1), 15–25. 10.1080/17439760.2015.1004555
(2019). Shaping the shared mental model: How leader humility helps teams to learn. Journal of Management & Organization, 25(5), 653–671. 10.1017/jmo.2017.21
(2017). When theory and research collide: Examining correlates of signature strengths use at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 527–548. 10.1007/s10902-016-9739-8
(2017). Leader humility and team innovation: Investigating the substituting role of task interdependence and the mediating role of team voice climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1115. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01115
(2019a). Strengths use, deficit correction, thriving and performance of academics at universities of technology. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 45, a1577. 10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1577
(2019b). Strength use, training and development, thriving, and intention to leave: The mediating effects of psychological need satisfaction. South African Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 24–38. 10.1177/0081246319849030
(2019). Growing followers: Exploring the effects of leader humility on follower self‐expansion, self‐efficacy, and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 56(2), 343–371. 10.1111/joms.12395
(2012). Thriving at work – A diary study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(4), 468–487. 10.1002/job.763
(2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787–818. 10.5465/amj.2010.0441
(2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517–1538. 10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
(2014). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 434–446. 10.1002/job.1907
(2015). The impact of person–job fit on job satisfaction: The mediator role of self efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 805–813. 10.1007/s11205-014-0659-x
(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 979–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
(2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250–275. 10.1002/job.756
(2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(1), 108–123. 10.1002/job.2115
(2008). Strengths-based leadership: Great leaders, great teams, and why people follow. Gallup Press.
(2005). Composing the reflected best-self portrait: Building pathways for becoming extraordinary in work organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 712–736. 10.5465/amr.2005.18378874
(2018). When family supportive supervisors meet employees' need for caring: Implications for work–family enrichment and thriving. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1678–1702. 10.1177/0149206315618013
(2006). Soaring on your strengths: discover, use, and brand your best self for career success. Penguin.
(1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. WeinmanS. WrightM. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio (pp. 35–37). NFER-NELSON.
(2011). A three-wave study of job resources, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Italian schoolteachers. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(3), 285–304. 10.1080/13594320903513916
(2007). Thriving in organizations. In D. NelsonC. Cooper (Eds.), Positive Organizational Behavior (pp. 74–85). Sage.
(2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537–549. 10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
(2016). Strengths use and deficit correction in organizations: Development and validation of a questionnaire. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 960–975. 10.1080/1359432X.2016.1193010
(2016). Strengths use and work engagement: A weekly diary study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 384–397. 10.1080/1359432X.2015.1089862
(2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 15–19. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004
(2018). When a leader is seen as too humble. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(4), 468–481. 10.1108/LODJ-03-2017-0056
(2018). Character strengths, strengths use, future self-continuity and subjective well-being among Chinese university students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1040. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01040
(2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. 10.1086/651257
(2020). Work-to-non-work spillover: The impact of public service motivation and meaningfulness on outcomes in work and personal life domains. Public Management Review, 22(4), 578–601. 10.1080/14719037.2019.1601242
(2018). How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 375–387. 10.1108/LODJ-07-2017-0181
(2019). Thriving of employees with disabilities: The roles of job self-efficacy, inclusion, and team-learning climate. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 21–34. 10.1002/hrm.21920
(