Abstract
We develop a theoretical model in which a country hosts foreign investment in the presence of a drug dealer, acting as a leader, and a drug seller, acting as a follower. A policy addressed to eradicate the drug trafficking encourages the kidnapping activity, and increase the security cost of firms. When the drug is not consumed in the host country the best policy is not to fight against drug trafficking. When the drug is consumed in the host country the optimal policy depends on the social marginal disutility of drug consumption respect to ransom paid by firms. In this case, when social marginal disutility is sufficiently larger than ransom, the government combats drug trafficking, otherwise, there is no policy at all.
References
Alesina, A., and R. Perotti. 1996. “Income Distribution, Political Instability and Investment.” European Economic Review 40 (6): 1203–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00030-5Search in Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2): 407–43, https://doi.org/10.2307/2937943.10.2307/2937943Search in Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169–217, https://doi.org/10.1086/jpe.76.2.1830481.Search in Google Scholar
Brigss, R. 2001. The Kidnapping Business. London, U.K: The Foreign Policy Center.Search in Google Scholar
CIDAC. 2013. 8 Delitos Primero. Indice Delictivo CIDAC. Also available at https://cidac.org/esp/uploads/1/Indice_Delictivo_CIDAC_2012._8_delitos_primero_1.pdf (accessed October 24, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Das, S. P., and S. Lahiri. 2006. “A Strategic Analysis of Terrorist Activity and Counter-Terrorism Policies.” Topics in Theoretical Economics 6 (1): 1–28, https://doi.org/10.2202/1534-598X.1295.Search in Google Scholar
Fay, J. F. 2011. Contemporary Security Management, 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-381549-1.00007-5Search in Google Scholar
Fay, J. F., and D. Patterson. 2018. Contemporary Security Management, 4th ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-809278-1.00006-2Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, R., E. Halibozek, and D. Walters. 2019. Introduction to Security, 10th ed. Waltham, MA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-04068-0.Search in Google Scholar
Gaviria, A. 2002. “Assessing the Effects of Corruption and Crime on Firms Performance: Evidence from Latin America.” Emerging Markets Review 3 (3): 245–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00024-9.Search in Google Scholar
Kreps, D. M., and J. A. Scheinkman. 1983. “Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes.” Bell Journal of Economics 14 (2): 326–37, https://doi.org/10.2307/3003636.Search in Google Scholar
Lahiri, S., and Y. Ono. 1999. “Optimal Tariffs in the Presence of Middlemen.” Canadian Journal of Economics 32 (1): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/136395.Search in Google Scholar
Levitt, S. D. 2017. “The Economics of Crime.” Journal of Political Economy 125 (6): 1920–5, https://doi.org/10.1086/694630.Search in Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E.Jr. 1990. “Why Doesn't Capital Flow From Rich to Poor Countries?.” American Economic Review 80 (2): 92–6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2006549.Search in Google Scholar
Pshiva, R., and G. A. Suarez. 2010. “Kidnappings and Corporate Investment in Colombia.” In The Economics of Crime: Lessons for and from Latin America, edited by R.di Tella, S. Edwards, and E. Schargrodsky, pp. 63–9. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226153766.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
The White House. 2012. “2012 National Control Drug Strategy.” Also available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ondcp/2012-national-drug-control-strategy (accessed October 29, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston