Negotiations of In/Visibility: Surveillance in Hito Steyerl’s How Not to be Seen
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, I analyze Hito Steyerl’s artwork How Not to be Seen: A Fucking Didactic Educational .MOV File (2013) from the perspective of surveillance. Looking back at one of the most influential artworks of the last decade, I understand How Not to be Seen as a discursive practice using images that poses an ambivalent surveillance critique through media- and wordplay. I first outline the historical references of Steyerl’s critique of technology, including Heidegger’s (1938) “image as world picture,” and position her in relation to other relevant surveillance-resistant practices. Drawing on analytical theory by Rancière (2006), I argue that the video is an example of a documentary fiction that organizes heterogenous visual, semiotic, and sensory material horizontally. From here, I move on to analyze the artwork focusing on how in both its content and form it engages humorously in discussions of (in)visibility, targeting, resolution, and data extraction. Using discourses on Steyerl’s work from herself and others, I show how the .MOV file, in playing with representational media, subverts categories used for surveillant targeting and data extraction. Hence, I argue that Steyerl ultimately advocates for resistance through ambivalence as a playful counter-visuality in the face of ubiquitous surveillance. In an era of intelligent imagery, this implicates using the image as an object that is part of the medium and not as subject representation.
Article Details
Surveillance & Society uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
- The author. The author licenses the article to the Surveillance Studies Network (SSN) for inclusion in Surveillance & Society (S&S), right of first publication. The copyright to the article remains with the author and any subsequent commercial reuse must be agreed by both parties.
- Non-commercial Users. SSN authorises all persons to use material published in S&S in any manner that is not primarily intended for or directed to commerical advantage or private monetary compensation, also provided that it is not modified and retains all attribution notices.
- Commercial Users. SSN retains the right to benefit from commerical reuse, in each specific case subject to the agreement of the author, and payment to SSN of a standard per-page fee (set by a vote of the Network and Editorial Board) by the Commercial User.
- Surveillance & Society supports open access archives and the free distribution of the results of academic work. Authors are encouraged to place copies of the final published version of their article in their university and / or other open access archives. We only ask that you make sure to include a link to the original published version on the Surveillance & Society website.
References
Adorno, Theodor. (1966) 1973. Negative Dialectics. Translated by E.B. Ashton. New York: The Seabury Press.
Benjamin, Walter. (1935) 1969. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Translated by Harry Zohn. In Illuminations, 1–26. New York: Schocken.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 59 (Winter): 3–7.
Demos, T.J. 2008. Traveling Images: Hito Steyerl. Artforum 46 (10): 408–413.
Foucault, Michel.1977. Discipline and Punish. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fyfe, Sophia, Claire Williams, Oliver J. Mason, and Graham J. Pickup. 2008. Apophenia, Theory of Mind and Schizotypy: Perceiving Meaning and Intentionality in Randomness. Cortex 44 (10): 1316–1325.
Galloway, Alexander R. 2011. Black Box, Black Bloc. In Communization and Its Discontents: Contestation, Critique, and Contemporary Struggles, edited by Benjamin Noys, 237–249. London: Minor Compositions/Automedia.
Gronlund, Melissa. 2016. Contemporary Art and Digital Culture. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Heidegger, Martin. (1938) 1987. Die Zeit Des Weltbildes. In Holzwege. Jena, DE: Vittorio Klostermann.
Invisible Committee, The. 2008. The Coming Insurrection. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
Laidler, John. 2019. High Tech is Watching You: Interview with Soshana Zuboff. The Harvard Gazette, March 4. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/03/harvard-professor-says-surveillance-capitalism-is-undermining-democracy/ [accessed March 28, 2020].
Lyon, David. 2017. Surveillance Culture: Engagement, Exposure, and Ethics in Digital Modernity. International Journal of Communication 11: 1–18.
MacNaughton, Ian, dir. 1970. Monty Python’s Flying Circus. Series 2, episode 11, “How Not to Be Seen.” Aired December 8, on BBC.
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pape, Toni. 2017. The Aesthetics of Stealth: Towards an Activist Philosophy of Becoming-Imperceptible in Contemporary Media. Feminist Media Studies 17 (4): 630–645.
Paulsen, Kris. 2017. Here/There: Telepresence, Touch, and Art at the Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Translated by Gabriel Rockhill. New York: Continuum.
———. 2006. Documentary Fiction: Marker and the Fiction of Memory. In Film Fables, 157–168. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
Steyerl, Hito. 2012. The Wretched of the Screen. Berlin, DE: Sternberg Press.
———. 2017. A Sea of Data: Apophenia and Pattern (Mis-)Recognition. In Duty Free Art: Art in the Age of Planetary Civil War, 47–63. London: Verso.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.