A Cognitive Processing Framework for Media Interpretation
Abstract
Abstract. The same media content can be interpreted by different people in radically different ways. We propose a framework that considers both the cognitive processes and the associated mental representations implicated in the interpretation of media content. The foundation of this argument stems from a constraint satisfaction approach to coherence, and it explains the dynamic relationship between media content and media consumers’ processing and interpreting of that content. By integrating parallel constraint satisfaction and coherence with reflective imaginative involvement, we present an explanation of how people interpret media stories and how they may engage with these stories in the future. We believe this framework has significant implications for media scholars interested in message processing and effects.
References
(2017). Comprehension models of audiovisual discourse processing. Human Communication Research, 43(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12107
(1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355
(1998).
Knowledge representation . In J. R. AndersonC. LabiereEds., The atomic components of thought (pp. 19–56). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2020, November). Testing measurement invariance for the Reflective Imaginative Involvement Scale. Presented at the Annual Convention of the National Communication Association.
(1993). Implicit learning: Theoretical and empirical issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2019). The impact of moral expectancy violations on audiences’ parasocial relationships with movie heroes and villains. Communication Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219886516
(2022). Linking epistemic monitoring to perceived realism: The impact of story-world inconsistency on realism and engagement. Media Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2032180
(1989).
Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context . In J. S. UlemanJ. A. BarghEds., Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.(2008).
Computational models of implicit learning . In R. SunEd., Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 396–421). Cambridge University Press.(2002). Deconstructing Ally: Explaining viewers’ interpretations of popular television. Media Psychology, 4(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_03
(2002). Do children learn how to watch television? The impact of extensive experience with Blue’s Clues on preschool children’s television viewing behavior. Journal of Communication, 52(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/52.2.264
(2010). The influence of explicitly and implicitly measured prejudice on interpretations of and reactions to black film. Media Psychology, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903562909
(2021).
Retrospective imaginative involvement and entertainment narratives: Initial forays . In C. KlimmtP. VordererEds., Oxford handbook of entertainment theory (pp. 735–754). Oxford University Press.(2020).
Retrospective imaginative involvement: Thinking about characters over time . In K. Dill-ShacklefordEd., Real characters: The psychology of parasocial relationships with media characters (pp. 145–164). Fielding Graduate University Press.(2020).
Priming and accessibility . In M. B. OliverA. A. RaneyJ. BryantEds., Media effects (pp. 83–99). Routledge.(2015). The MODE model and its implications for studying the media. Media Psychology, 18, 312–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.937440
(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
(2010). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(5), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.668
(2020, June). Batman Returns: Mapping the mental representations of characters who appear across multiple narratives. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Society for Cognitive Studies of the Moving Image, Grand Rapids, MI.
(1980/2001).
Encoding/decoding . In H. StuartD. HobsonA. LoweP. WillisEds., Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). Hutchinson.(1994). Reflections upon the encoding/decoding model: An interview with Stuart Hall. Viewing, reading, listening: Audiences and cultural reception, 253–274.
(2020). Toward a theory of media priming. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1815232
(2021, August). The Media Use Model: Using constraint satisfaction and coherence to explain media processes and effects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC), Communication Theory and Methodology Division, New Orleans (virtual).
(1997). Equal ratings but separate meanings: Stereotypes and the construal of traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 720–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.720
(1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103(2), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284
(2009).
The limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing . In R. NabiM. B. OliverEds., Handbook of media effects and processes (pp. 193–204). Sage.(2013). The impact of subtitles on comprehension of narrative film. Media Psychology, 16(4), 412–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.826119
(2000). Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0204_03
(1989). Interpretive viewers and structured programs: The implicit representations of soap opera characters. Communication Research, 16, 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016001002
(2020). The scene perception & event comprehension theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455
(1986).
The appeal of parallel distributed processing . In J. L. McClellandD. R. RumelhartEds., Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 3–44). MIT Press.(1998). Introduction to connectionist modelling of cognitive processes. Oxford University Press.
(1980/1999 ). The nationwide television studies. Routledge.
(1984/1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and popular literature. University of North Carolina Press.
(2007).
Comprehension of the media . In D. R. Roskos-EwoldsenJ. Monahan (Eds.), Communication and social cognition: Theories and methods (pp. 319–348). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.(2010).
Message processing . In C. BergerM. RoloffD. R. Roskos-EwoldsenEds., Handbook for communication science (2nd ed, pp. 129–144). Sage.(2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
(2013). The affective meanings of automatic social behaviors: Three mechanisms that explain priming. Psychological Review, 120(1), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030972
(2014). Priming: Constraint satisfaction and interactive competition. Social Cognition, 32, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.supp.152
(2020, May). What do we do with narratives after the fact? Expanding the Reflective Imaginative Involvement Scale. Paper presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Gold Coast, Australia
(2018). Extending conceptualization and measurement of narrative engagement after-the-fact: Parasocial relationship and retrospective imaginative involvement. Media Psychology, 21(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2017.1328313
(2002). Duality of the mind: Toward a bottom up approach toward cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2016). Anatomy of the mind: Exploring psychological mechanisms and processes with the CLARION architecture. Oxford University Press.
(2018).
Intrinsic motivation for truly autonomy agents . In H. A. AbbassJ. ScholzD. J. ReidEds., Foundations of trusted autonomy (pp. 273–282). Springer Open.(2018). Why is a computational framework for motivational and metacognitive control needed? Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 30, 13–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2017.1413141
(2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112(1), 159–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.159
(2008).
Constraints on cognitive architectures . In R. SunEd., Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 170–185). Cambridge University Press.(1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(3), 435–467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00057046
(1998). Coherence as constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 22(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80033-0
(2021, May). “Can’t stop thinking about Star Wars”: Predictors of retrospective imaginative involvement. Paper presented at the 71st Meeting of the International Communication Association, Denver.
(2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
