Marius Zemp: A Grammar of Purik Tibetan

References

Bielmeier, Roland. 1985. Das Märchen vom Prinzen Čobzaṅ. Eine tibetische Erzählung aus Baltistan. Text, Übersetzung, Grammatik und westtibetisch vergleichendes Glossar. St. Augustin: VGH Wissenschaftsverlag.Search in Google Scholar

Bielmeier, Roland. 2000. Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic-epistemic functions of auxiliaries in Western Tibetan. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 23(2). 79–125.Search in Google Scholar

Bielmeier, Roland, Katrin Häsler, Chungda Haller, Felix Haller, Veronika Hein, Brigitte Huber, Marianne Volkart, Thomas Preiswerk, Ngawang Tsering, Manuel Widmer & Marius Zemp. 2018. (verbs), forthcoming (nouns). Comparative dictionary of Tibetan dialects (CDTD). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110554076Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Kun [Gun Zhang] & Betty Shefts Chang. 1981. Spoken Tibetan texts, vol. IV. (Li shi yu yan yan jiu suo: Special publications, 74,4.). Nankang, Taipei: Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica.Search in Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57. 626–655.10.2307/414343Search in Google Scholar

Grierson, George Abraham (ed.). 1909. Linguistic survey of India. vol. III: Tibeto-Burman family, part I: general introduction, specimens of the Tibetan dialects, and the North Assam group. Calcutta: Superintendent of Government Printing. Reprint 1967, Delhi etc.: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Nathan W. 2013. ḥdug as a testimonial marker in Classical and Old Tibetan. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 1–16.10.5070/H912123714Search in Google Scholar

Jäschke, Heinrich August. 1881. A Tibetan-English dictionary. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Eunice. 2009. Evidentiality and mirativity in Balti. Master’s thesis. University of London.Search in Google Scholar

Koshal, Sanyukta. 1979. Ladakhi grammar. Delhi etc.: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Koshal, Sanyukta. 1982. Conversational Ladakhi. Delhi etc.: Motilal Banarsidass.Search in Google Scholar

Oisel, Guillaume. 2013. Morphosyntaxe et sémantique des auxiliaires et des connecteurs du tibétain littéraire. Étude diachronique et synchronique. PhD thesis. Villejuif Cedex: Laboratoire du LACITO – CNRS.Search in Google Scholar

Rangan, K. 1979. A grammar of Purki, a language of the Tibeto-Burman family spoken in Ladakh District, Kashmir. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Search in Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina. 2009. Language change and the fossilization of the Old Tibetan b- prefix in Ladakhi and Balti. In Monisha Ahmed & John Bray (eds.), Recent research on Ladakh 2009. Papers from the 12th colloquium of the international association for Ladakh studies, Kargil, 81–96. Kargil & Leh: International Association of Ladakh Studies.Search in Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina. 2011. Kenhat, the dialects of Upper Ladakh and Zanskar. In Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds.), Himalayan languages and linguistics. Studies in phonology, semantics, morphology and syntax, 235–301. Leiden etc.: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004194489.i-322Search in Google Scholar

Zeisler, Bettina. 2018. Evidence for the development of ‘evidentiality’ as a grammatical category in Tibetan. In Ad Foolen, Helen de Hoop & Gijs Mulder (eds.), Evidence for evidentiality, 227–256, Human Cognitive Processing 61. – Online draft version 2014. https://www.ru.nl/publish/pages/720339/zeisler_evidence_for_the_development_of_evidentiality_as_a_grammtical_category_in_tibetan.pdf.10.1075/hcp.61.10zeiSearch in Google Scholar

Zemp, Marius. 2016. A functional reconstruction of the Proto-Tibetan verbal system. Himalayan Linguistics 15(2). 88–135.10.5070/H915227937Search in Google Scholar