Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 23, 2021

The Government in SNA-Compliant DSGE Models

  • Gonzalo F. de-Córdoba , Benedetto Molinari ORCID logo EMAIL logo and José L. Torres

Abstract

The government size in developed economies expanded remarkably after the Second World War. This growth shaped the role of the government as a key player in the economic activity and the aggregate dynamics of a country. However, the way in which the government is represented in DSGE models is often reductive, containing homogeneous public spending and a few distortionary taxes without clear counterparts in fiscal data. This paper shows how dynamic general equilibrium models can incorporate a detailed government sector as defined in the System of National Accounts (SNA). This government features six types of public expenditures (i.e. the government’s intermediate consumption, public wage bill, debt service, public investment, and transfers to households both in-kind and other-than-in-kind), and five distortionary taxes (i.e. consumption tax, capital and labor income taxes, corporate tax and social contributions).

JEL Classification: J24; J31; O33

Corresponding author: Benedetto Molinari, Department of Economics, Universidad de Málaga and RCEA, Málaga, Spain, E-mail:

Award Identifier / Grant number: PID2019-107161GB-C31

Award Identifier / Grant number: SEJ-1512

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Pau Pujolas, Tim Kehoe, Antonia Diaz, Luis Puch for useful comments, as well as the participants to the XIX SAET Conference on Current Trends in Economics and the 26th European Workshop on General Equilibrium Theory. The authors acknowledge financial support from Spanish national grant PID2019-107161GB-C31 (MICINN, Gobierno de España) and Spanish regional grant SEJ-1512 (CeiceExcelencia 2012, Junta de Andalucía).

References

Alesina, A., C. Favero, and F. Giavazzi. 2015. “The Output Effect of Fiscal Consolidation Plans.” Journal of International Economics 96 (S1): S19–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.11.003.Search in Google Scholar

Afonso, A., and P. Gomes. 2014. “Interactions between Private and Public Wages.” Journal of Macroeconomics 39: 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Aschauer, D. 1985. “Fiscal Policy and Aggregate Demand.” The American Economic Review 75 (1): 117–27.Search in Google Scholar

Bandeira, G. A., E. Pappa, R. Sajedi, and E. Vella. 2018. “Fiscal Consolidation in a Low Inflation Environment: Pay Cuts versus Lost Jobs.” International Journal of Central Banking 14: 7–53.Search in Google Scholar

Barro, R. J. 1990. “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 98: S103–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/261726.Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, M., and R. King. 1993. “Fiscal Policy in General Equilibrium.” The American Economic Review 83: 315–33.Search in Google Scholar

Bermperoglou, D., E. Pappa, and E. Vella. 2017. “The Government Wage Bill and Private Activity.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 79: 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2017.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

Bouakez, H., and N. Rebei. 2007. “Why Does Private Consumption Rise after a Government Spending Shock?” Canadian Journal of Economics 40: 954–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.00438.x.Search in Google Scholar

Carey, D., and J. Rabesona. 2002. “Tax Ratios on Labour and Capital Income and on Consumption.” OECD Economic Studies 35.10.1787/eco_studies-v2002-art11-enSearch in Google Scholar

Chang, J.-J., H.-Y. Lin, and N. Traum. 2021. “Fiscal Consolidation and Public Wages.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 532-3: 503–33.10.1111/jmcb.12775Search in Google Scholar

Christiano, L., M. Eichenbaum, and C. L. Evans. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/426038.Search in Google Scholar

De-Córdoba, G., J. Pérez, and J. L. Torres. 2012. “Public and Private Sector Wages Interactions in a General Equilibrium Model.” Public Choice 150 (1): 309–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9705-7.Search in Google Scholar

De-Córdoba, G., P. Pujolas, and J. L. Torres. 2017. “Fiscal Discipline and Defaults.” Review of Economic Dynamics 24: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2016.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Dellas, H., D. Malliaropulos, D. Papageorgiou, and E. Vourvachaki. 2018. “Fiscal Multipliers with an Informal Sector.” Working paper.10.2139/ssrn.4196588Search in Google Scholar

Drautzburg, T., and H. Uhlig. 2015. “Fiscal Stimulus and Distortionary Taxation.” Review of Economic Dynamics 18 (4): 894–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2015.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Economides, G., H. Park, A. Philippopoulos, and S. Sakkas. 2022. “On the Mix of Government Expenditure and Tax Revenues.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 26 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100520000036.Search in Google Scholar

European Central Bank, and United Nations. 2015. “Financial Production, Flows and Stocks in the System of National Accounts.” In Handbook on National Accounting, Studies in Method, Series F, Vol. 113. New York: United Nations Publication.Search in Google Scholar

Fatás, A., and L. H. Summers. 2018. “The Permanent Effects of Fiscal Consolidations.” Journal of International Economics 112: 238–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Fève, P., J. Matheron, and J.-G. Sahuc. 2013. “A Pitfall with Estimated DSGE-Based Government Spending Multipliers.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 5: 141–78. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.5.4.141.Search in Google Scholar

Fontaine, I., I. Galvez-Iniesta, P. Gomes, and D. Vila-Martin. 2020. “Labour Market Flows: Accounting for the Public Sector.” Labour Economics 62: 101770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101770.Search in Google Scholar

Forni, L., L. Monteforte, and L. Sessa. 2009. “The General Equilibrium Effects of Fiscal Policy: Estimates for the Euro Area.” Journal of Public Economics 93: 559–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.010.Search in Google Scholar

Gemmell, N., R. Kneller, and I. Sanz. 2016. “Does the Composition of Government Expenditure Matter for Long-Run GDP Levels?” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 78: 522–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12121.Search in Google Scholar

Glomm, G., and B. Ravikumar. 1994. “Public Investment in Infrastructure in a Simple Growth Model.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 18 (6): 1173–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(94)90052-3.Search in Google Scholar

Gomes, P. 2015. “Optimal Public Sector Wages.” Economic Journal 125 (587): 1425–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12155.Search in Google Scholar

Gomes, P. 2018. “Heterogeneity and the Public Sector Wage Policy.” International Economic Review 59 (3): 1469–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12310.Search in Google Scholar

Hagedorny, M., I. Manovskii, and K. Mitman. 2019. “The Fiscal Multiplier.” In NBER Working Paper, 25571.10.3386/w25571Search in Google Scholar

Ilzetzki, E., E. G. Mendoza, and C. A. Végh. 2013. “How Big (Small?) Are Fiscal Multipliers?” Journal of Monetary Economics 60: 239–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

Lansing, J. K. 1998. “Optimal Fiscal Policy in a Business Cycle Model with Public Capital.” Canadian Journal of Economics 31: 337–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/136327.Search in Google Scholar

Leeper, E. M., N. Traum, and T. B. Walker. 2017. “Clearing up the Fiscal Multiplier Morass.” The American Economic Review 107 (8): 2409–54. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20111196.Search in Google Scholar

Leeper, E. M., T. B. Walker, and S.-C. S. Yang. 2010. “Government Investment and Fiscal Stimulus.” Journal of Monetary Economics 57: 1000–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Linnemann, L. 2009. “Macroeconomic Effects of Shocks to Public Employment.” Journal of Macroeconomics 31 (2): 252–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2008.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

Ljungqvist, L., and T. J. Sargent. 2004. Recursive Macroeconomioc Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

McDaniel, C. 2007. Average Tax Rates on Consumption, Investment, Labor and Capital in the OECD 1950-2003. Arizona State University, Tempe (Manuscript).Search in Google Scholar

Mendoza, E., A. Razin, and L. Tesar. 1994. “Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics: Cross-Country Estimated of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34: 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(94)90021-3.Search in Google Scholar

Pappa, E. 2009. “The Effects of Fiscal Shocks on Employment and the Real Wage.” International Economic Review 50: 217–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2008.00528.x.Search in Google Scholar

Philippopoulos, A., P. Varthalitis, and V. Vassilatos. 2017a. “Fiscal Consolidation in an Open Economy with Sovereign Premia and without Monetary Policy Independence.” International Journal of Central Banking 13: 259–306.Search in Google Scholar

Philippopoulos, A., P. Varthalitis, and V. Vassilatos. 2017b. “Fiscal Consolidation and its Cross-Country Effects.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 83: 55–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2017.07.007.Search in Google Scholar

Quadrini, V., and A. Trigari. 2007. “Public Employment and the Business Cycle.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109 (4): 723–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2007.00517.x.Search in Google Scholar

Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in US Business Cycles: A Bayesian DSGE Approach.” The American Economic Review 97 (3): 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.586.Search in Google Scholar

Stähler, N., and C. Thomas. 2012. “FiMod: A DSGE Model for Fiscal Policy Simulations.” Economic Modelling 29: 239–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zubairy, S. 2014. “On Fiscal Multipliers: Estimates from a Medium Scale DSGE Model.” International Economic Review 55 (1): 169–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/iere.12045.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bejm-2020-0120).


Received: 2020-05-29
Revised: 2021-04-14
Accepted: 2021-05-29
Published Online: 2021-06-23

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.5.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2020-0120/html
Scroll to top button