Online incivility, hate speech and political violence in Zambia: Examining the role of online political campaign messages

References

1. Abubakar, A. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Linking work-family interference, workplace incivility, gender and psychological distress. ’, Journal of Management Development, 37:3, pp. 226–42.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Balliet, D., and Van Lange, P. A. M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. ’, Psychological Bulletin, 139:5, pp. 1090–112.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bouilianne, S.. ( 2011;), ‘ Stimulating or reinforcing political interest: Using panel data to examine reciprocal effects between news media and political interest. ’, Political Communication, 28:2, pp. 147–62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Calabrese, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Liberalism’s disease: Civility above justice. ’, European Journal of Communication, 30:5, pp. 539–53.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Carter, K. M. and Straus, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Changing patterns of political violence in sub-Saharan Africa. ’, in K. M. Carter, and S. Straus. (eds), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford University Press;, 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.701. Accessed 17 February 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chama, B.. ( 2012;), ‘ Satirical censorship in press practice in Zambia: The case of newspaper journalist Roy Clarke. ’, Africa Today, 59:2, pp. 81–90.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coe, K.,, Kenski, K., and Rains, S. A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. ’, Journal of Communication, 64:4, pp. 658–79.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Ellison, N. B.,, Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C.. ( 2007;), ‘ The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12:4, pp. 1143–68.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Freedman, P.,, Franz, M., and Goldstein, K.. ( 2004;), ‘ Campaign advertising and democratic citizenship. ’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:4, pp. 723–41.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fumpa-Makano, R.,, Mukanda, M., and Vincent, M. G.. ( 2019;), ‘ Participatory action research and prospects for electoral conflict prevention in Zambia. ’, Journal of International and Global Studies, 10:2, p. 21.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Goldring, E., and Wahman, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Fighting for a name on the ballot: Constituency-level analysis of nomination violence in Zambia. ’, Democratization, 25:6, pp. 996–1015.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gondwe, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Are late night TV shows polarizing society? Examining the ambivalence of new version of political partisanship in the United States. ’, Global Media Journal, 15:29, pp. 1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gondwe, G.. ( 2018;), ‘ When party policies do not matter: Examination, the ambivalence of voting behaviors in the Zambian presidential elections. ’, African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 12:1, pp. 10–21.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gondwe, G.. ( 2020;), ‘ Incivility, online participation, and message delivery in the 2019 Hong Kong protests: Exploring the relationship. ’, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10:4, 10.30935/ojcmt/8397. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gwagwa, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Sub-Saharan Africa internet freedom landscape. ’, Open Technology Fund Summit 2017, Valencia, 14–17 November.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Habermas, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ The public sphere: An encyclopedia article (1964). ’, in J. Gripsrud,, H. Moe,, A. Molander, and G. Murdock. (eds), The Idea of the Public Sphere: A Reader, Lanham, MD:: Lexington Books;, pp. 114–20.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Habermas, J.. ( 1989), On Society and Politics: A Reader, Boston, MA:: Beacon Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hayes, A. F.. ( 2015;), ‘ An index and test of linear moderated mediation. ’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50:1, pp. 1–22.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hopp, T., and Vargo, C. J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Does negative campaign advertising stimulate uncivil communication on social media? Measuring audience response using big data. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 68, March, pp. 368–77.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Huysman, M., and Wulf, V.. ( 2004), Social Capital and Information Technology, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jiang, M., and Esarey, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Uncivil society in digital China: Incivility, fragmentation, and political stability. ’, International Journal of Communication, 12, pp. 1928–44.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Johnston, K.,, Tanner, M.,, Lalla, N., and Kawalski, D.. ( 2013;), ‘ Social capital: The benefit of Facebook “friends”. ’, Behaviour and Information Technology, 32:1, pp. 24–36.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kasoma, F. P.. ( 1996;), ‘ The foundations of African ethics (Afriethics) and the professional practice of journalism: The case for society-centred media morality. ’, Africa Media Review, 10:3, pp. 93–116.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kim, J.,, Wyatt, R. O., and Katz, E.. ( 1999;), ‘ News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. ’, Political Communication, 16:4, pp. 361–85.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kimotho, S. G., and Nyaga, R. N.. ( 2016;), ‘ Digitized ethnic hate speech: Understanding effects of digital media hate speech on citizen journalism in Kenya. ’, Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7:3, pp. 189–200.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lück, J., and Nardi, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ Incivility in user comments on online news articles: Investigating the role of opinion dissonance for the effects of incivility on attitudes, emotions and the willingness to participate. ’, Studies in Communication and Media, 8:3, pp. 311–37.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Marcuse, H.. ( 1969;), ‘ The realm of freedom and the realm of necessity: A reconsideration. ’, Praxis, 5:1, pp. 20–25.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Marten, L., and Kula, N. C.. ( 2008;), ‘ Zambia: “One Zambia, one nation, many languages”. ’, in A. Simpson. (ed.), Language and National Identity in Africa, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 291–313.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mfumbusa, B. F.. ( 2008;), ‘ Newsroom ethics in Africa: Quest for a normative framework. ’, African Communication Research, 1:2, pp. 139–58.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Miner, K. N., and Eischeid, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ Observing incivility toward coworkers and negative emotions: Do gender of the target and observer matter?. ’, Sex Roles, 66:7, pp. 492–505.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Molteno, R.. ( 1974;), ‘ Cleavage and conflict in Zambian politics: A study in sectionalism. ’, Politics in Zambia, 62:106, pp. 253–61.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Musonda, A.. ( 2015;), ‘ Perceptions of tribalism in Zambia. ’, Zambia Reports, 19 June, https://zambiareports.com/2015/06/19/perceptions-of-tribalism-in-zambia/. Accessed 14 December 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ndlela, M. N.. ( 2020;), ‘ Young people, social media, and political participation. The limits of discursive (in)civility in the Kenyan context. ’, in M. N. Ndlela, and W. Mano. (eds), Social Media and Elections in Africa, vol. 2, Cham:: Palgrave Macmillan;, pp. 77–94.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Parks, L., and Mukherjee, R.. ( 2017;), ‘ From platform jumping to self-censorship: Internet freedom, social media, and circumvention practices in Zambia. ’, Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14:3, pp. 221–37.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rotberg, R. I.. ( 1967;), ‘ Tribalism and politics in Zambia. ’, Africa Report, 12:9, p. 29.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rowe, I.. ( 2015;), ‘ Civility 2.0: A comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 18:2, pp. 121–38.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Santana, A. D.. ( 2014;), ‘ Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. ’, Journalism Practice, 8:1, pp. 18–33.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schudson, M.. ( 1997;), ‘ Why conversation is not the soul of democracy. ’, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 14:1, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shambare, R., and Mvula, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ South African students’ perceptions of Facebook: Some implications for instructors. ’, African Journal of Business Management, 5:26, pp. 10557–64.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Siame, C.. ( 2019;), ‘ In Zambia, freedom of expression is not freedom to incite violence. ’, Mail & Guardian, 4 April, https://mg.co.za/article/2019-04-04-00-in-zambia-freedom-of-expression-is-not-freedom-to-incite-violence/. Accessed 18 November 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Some, E.,, Gondwe, G., and Rowe, E. W.. ( 2019;), ‘ Cybersecurity and driverless cars: In search for a normative way of safety. ’, in 2019 Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security, Granada, Spain, 22–25 October, IEEE, pp. 352–57.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Wahman, M., and Goldring, E.. ( 2020;), ‘ Pre-election violence and territorial control: Political dominance and subnational election violence in polarized African electoral systems. ’, Journal of Peace Research, 57:1, 10.1177/0022343319884990. Accessed 17 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Wang, M. Y., and Silva, D. E.. ( 2018;), ‘ A slap or a jab: An experiment on viewing uncivil political discussions on Facebook. ’, Computers in Human Behavior, 18:81, pp. 73–83.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Gondwe, Gregory. ( 2021;), ‘ Online incivility, hate speech and political violence in Zambia: Examining the role of online political campaign messages. ’, Journal of African Media Studies, 13:1, pp. 35–51, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00032_1
    [Google Scholar]