Abstract
This article analyzes the occurrence of performative root phenomena in complement clauses. I show that the clauses that host this kind of phenomena have the same distribution as direct speech complements. I argue that the correspondence is based on the fact that, due to their rich syntactic left periphery, these embedded clauses convey speech acts. This assumption receives further support by the grammatical behavior of what I argue are the two major classes of verbs subordinating direct speech and ERP-hosting embedded clauses: locutionary and illocutionary embedding verbs. I analyze illocutionary verbs as bearing an abstract illocutionary predicate selecting either a propositional or a speech-act type, and locutionary verbs as ordinary relational predicates selecting a speech-act type. Taken together, these elements allow for a straightforward syntax-semantics interface and explain the differentiated behavior of root phenomena in complements to locutionary and illocutionary verbs.
References
Adger, David. 2010. A minimalist theory of feature structure. In Kibort Anna & Greville Corbett (eds.), Features: Perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, 185–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199577743.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Anand, Pranav, Jane Grimshaw & Hacquard Valentine. 2017. Sentence embedding predicates, factivity and subjects. In Cleo Condoravdi (ed.), A Festschrift for Lauri Karttunen. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Search in Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 1999. The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22(4). 327–366. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005466020243.10.1023/A:1005466020243Search in Google Scholar
Bellert, Irena. 1977. On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 337–351.Search in Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Mara Frascarelli. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(1). 18–65.Search in Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1980. Semantic structure and illocutionary force. In John Searle, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), Speech act theory and pragmatics, 1–35. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_1Search in Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5). 511–545. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025887707652.10.1023/A:1025887707652Search in Google Scholar
Carston, Robin. 2002. Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470754603Search in Google Scholar
Cattell, Ray. 1978. On the source of interrogative adverbs. Language 54. 61–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/412999.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Akmajian Adrian (eds.), Formal syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195115260.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean. 2012. Splitting up force. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 229–255. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190.10conSearch in Google Scholar
Cormany (ed.). 2014. Distinguishing clause-typing and subject positions in imperatives. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20(1). 61–69.Search in Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984 [1979]. Quotation. In Donald Davidson (ed.). Inquiries into truth and interpretation, 79–92. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199246297.003.0006Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Wayne. 2016. A theory of saying reports. In Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds.), Indirect reports and pragmatics, 291–332. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-21395-8_15Search in Google Scholar
Dayal, Veneeta & Jane Grimshaw. 2009. Subordination at the interface: The quasi-subordination hypothesis. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/campuspress.yale.edu/dist/6/2964/files/2019/05/QSpaper.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In David Adger, Cécile De Cat & Tsoulas George (eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects, 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/1-4020-1910-6_4Search in Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486258Search in Google Scholar
Frey, Werner & Andre Meinunger. 2019. Topic marking and illocutionary force. In Valéria Molnár, Verner Egerland & Susanne Winkler (eds.), The architecture of topic, 95–137. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9781501504488-004Search in Google Scholar
García-Núñez, José María. 2020. On the left periphery of Spanish indirect interrogatives. Probus 32(1). 55–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/probus-2019-0005.Search in Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2010. About the speaker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571895.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Green, Georgia. 1976. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52(2). 382–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/412566.Search in Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell. 2000. Illocutionary force and semantic content. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(5). 435–473. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005642421177.10.1023/A:1005642421177Search in Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle & Laura Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33(11). 1665–1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(00)00063-1.Search in Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1979. Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10. 279–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.197923065.Search in Google Scholar
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Martin Stokhof. 1982. Semantic analysis of wh-complements. Linguistics and Philosophy 5(2). 175–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00351052.Search in Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2004. Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop. ZAS papers in linguistics 35(1). 157–192.10.21248/zaspil.35.2004.226Search in Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116(10). 1651–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014.Search in Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199858774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Haumann, Dagmar. 2007. Adverb licensing and clause structure in English. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.105Search in Google Scholar
Hegarty, Michael. 1992. Adjunct extraction and chain configurations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. II, 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996591.ch23Search in Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan. 1975. On assertive predicates. In John Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 4, 91–124. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368828_005Search in Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4. 465–497.Search in Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2016. Evidential moods in attitude and speech reports (slides). 1st Syncart Workshop. University of Siena. https://works.bepress.com/angelika_kratzer/10/ (accessed 4 July 2021).Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics 9. 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017903702063.10.1023/A:1017903702063Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2014. Embedding illocutionary acts. In Thomas Roeper & Margaret Speas (eds.), Recursion: Complexity in cognition, 125–155. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-05086-7_4Search in Google Scholar
Maki, Hideki, Lizanne Kaiser & Masao Ochi. 1999. Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 107. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0024-3841(98)00055-2.Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H Portner (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics, 87–126. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Meinunger, André. 2006. On the discourse impact of subordinate clauses. In Valéria Molnár & Susan Winkler (eds.), The architecture of focus: Studies in generative grammar 82, 459–487. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110922011.459Search in Google Scholar
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2012. Agreements that occur mainly in the main clause. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.), Main clause phenomena: New horizons, 79–111. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.190.04miySearch in Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 2003. Propositional attitudes without propositions. Synthese 135(1). 77–118. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022945009188.10.1023/A:1022945009188Search in Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Pietroski, Paul. 2005. Events and semantic architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244300.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2001. Interpreting mood. Probus 13(1). 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.13.1.81.Search in Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 2013. The complementizer system in spoken English: Evidence from broadcast media. In Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds.), Information structure and agreement, 11–54. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.197.01radSearch in Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1). 53–94.10.21825/philosophica.82606Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195171976.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2005. On the grammatical basis of language development: A case study. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 70–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195136517.013.0002Search in Google Scholar
Rodman, Robert. 1997 [1974]. On left dislocation. In Anagnostopoulou Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.), Materials on left dislocation, 31–54. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.14.05rodSearch in Google Scholar
Rooryck, Johan. 2001. Evidentiality, part I. GLOT 5. 125–133.Search in Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the left periphery: Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1. 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.1.05rou.Search in Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin. 2007. Interrogative complement clauses. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On information structure, meaning and form: Generalizations across languages (Linguistik Actuell/Linguistics Today 100), 425–446. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.100.23schSearch in Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar
Searle, John & Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1007/1-4020-3167-X_5Search in Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1993. About indirect questions and semi-questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 16. 45–78.10.1007/BF00984722Search in Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra & Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Woods, Rebecca. 2016. Embedded inverted questions as embedded illocutionary acts. In Kyeong-min Kim (ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 417–426. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Search in Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 1971. In a manner of speaking. Linguistic Inquiry 2. 223–233.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
