Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Personal Versus General Belief in a Just World, Karma, and Well-Being: Evidence from Thailand and the UK

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The belief in a just world (BJW) is the belief that people get what they deserve and deserve what they get. The theory and research findings suggest that believing the world is fair to “me” (personal BJW or PBJW) is associated with positive psychological functioning, whereas believing that the world is fair to people in general (general BJW or GBJW) may not. Against a backdrop of mixed findings in samples recruited in Asian countries, we conducted two studies in Thailand (N = 177 and N = 175) and one in the UK (N = 345). Study 1 examined the relationships between PBJW, GBJW, life satisfaction, and depression in Thailand; Study 2 also included Karma and was conducted in Thailand and the UK. In both studies, PBJW uniquely predicted well-being. When controlling for BJW, belief in Karma positively predicted life satisfaction and depression only in the UK sample. In addition, Karma was uniquely predicted by GBJW but more strongly so in Thailand. Furthermore, within both samples, individuals endorsed PBJW more strongly than GBJW; comparing across samples, PBJW was more strongly endorsed in the UK than Thailand, whereas GBJW was more strongly endorsed in Thailand than the UK. However, sample nationality did not moderate associations between BJW, Karma and well-being. Results support the cultural generality of just world theory and the psychological priority of PBJW and indicate that the cultural concept of Karma does not explain relationships between just-world beliefs and well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Study 1, we also created a 14-item affect scale borrowing positive affect items from the Affect Valuation Index by Tsai et al. (2006) (5 items, e.g., calm, relaxed, satisfied, α = .74) and negative affect items from the psychological discomfort measure by Elliot and Devine (1994) (9 items, e.g., unhappy, sad, tense, α = .85) which ask how often individuals have had each feeling during the last month (1 = never to 4 = all of the time). When we entered both BJW constructs predicting positive and negative affect, PBJW predicted positive affect (β = .49, p < .001) and negative affect (β = .− 40, p < .001) in expected ways, whereas GBJW did not predict positive affect (β = − .00, p = .960) or negative affect (β = .15, p = .062). Note that the marginal positive relationship between GBJW and negative affect is the opposite of the negative relationship predicted by the cultural specificity hypothesis.

  2. We recruited the UK samples from the School’s research participation scheme; thus, some mature students completed our study. When we exclude mature students (age over 23) in the analyses, the main result patterns are still the same.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was a part of the corresponding author’s Ph.D. study supported by Thammasat University and supervised by Robbie M. Sutton and Ayse K. Uskul. The authors would like to express our gratitude to the participants, to the colleagues at Thammasat University for their help with sample recruitment in Thailand and to Mr Tarid Wongvorachan, Ms Sutasinee Yooyendee and their team for their help with data entry in Study 1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phatthanakit Chobthamkit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chobthamkit, P., Sutton, R.M., Uskul, A.K. et al. Personal Versus General Belief in a Just World, Karma, and Well-Being: Evidence from Thailand and the UK. Soc Just Res 35, 296–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00393-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00393-4

Keywords

Navigation