Abstract
We analyze theoretically ultra-low frequency electromagnetic noise caused by deformations of seabed and porous coastal rocks subjected to incident long oceanic waves. A variable pressure on the seabed due to propagation of long gravity waves (LGWs) gives rise to variations in pore pressure gradient followed by groundwater filtration in pores and channels of porous rocks. These processes result in the generation of telluric electric currents in water-saturated porous rock of the seashore due to electrokinetic effect. In the model a displacement of the sea surface in LGWs is described in the "shallow water" approximation. A set of basic equations describing rock strain and electrokinetic effect is solved in quasi-static approximation. The telluric electric field in the porous rocks of coastal zone are found as a function of depth and distance to the coastline at different frequencies of LGWs. The theoretical analysis has shown that telluric electric noise produced by the LGW can exceed the level of natural electric noise during geomagnetically quiet period in a coastal strip about several tens of meters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrov VV (1985) Fresh water electrophysics. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, p 24 (in Russian)
Anisimov SV, Mareev EA, Bakastov SS (1999) On the generation and evolution of aeroelectric structures in the surface layer. J Geophys Res 104(D12):14359–14368. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900117
Bullard EC, Parker RL (1970) Electromagnetic induction in the oceans. In: Maxwell AE (ed) The Sea, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 695–730
Chave AD, Constable SC, Edwards RN (1992) Electrical exploration methods for the seafloor electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, vol 2. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, pp 931–966
YaI F (1944) On the theory of seismic and seismoelectric phenomena in a moist soil. J Phys (USSR) 8:230–241
Graham MT, MacAllister DJ, Vinogradov J, Jackson MD, Butler AP (2018) Self-potential as a predictor of seawater intrusion in coastal groundwater boreholes. Water Resour Res 54(9):6055–6071. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr022972
Grandshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (2007) Table of integrals, series, and products, 7nth edn. In: Jeffrey A, Zwillinger D (eds) Elsevier
Gokhberg MB, Kolosnitsyn NI, Lapshin VM (2009) Electrokinetic effect in the near-surface layers of the Earth. Izvestiya. Phys Solid Earth 45:633–639. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351309080035
Ivlev LS, Dovgalyuk YuA (1999) Physics of atmospheric aerosol systems. Institute of Chemistry of St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg (in Russian)
Jougnot D, Roubinet D, Guarracino L, Maineult A (2020) Modeling streaming potential in porous and fractured media, description and benefits of the effective excess charge density approach. In: Biswas A, Sharma S (eds) advances in modeling and interpretation in near surface geophysics. Chapter 4. Springer, Cham, pp 61–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28909-6
Jouniaux L, Maineult A, Naudet V, Pessel M, Sailhac P (2009) Review of self-potential methods in hydrogeophysics. CR Geosci 341(10–11):928–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2009.08.008
Kang HJ, Cho IK, Kim JH, Yong HH, Song SH, Park YG (2014) SP monitoring at a sea dike. Near Surface Geophys 12:83–92. https://doi.org/10.3997/1873-0604.2013063
Kuvshinov A (2008) 3-D global induction in the oceans and solid Earth: recent progress in modeling magnetic and electric fields from sources of magnetospheric, ionospheric, and oceanic origin. Surv Geophys 29(2):139–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9045-z
Liu C, Wang X, Zhang S, Xie C (2019) Effects of lateral conductivity variations on geomagnetically induced currents: H-polarization. IEEE Access 7:6310–6318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889462
MacAllister D, Jackson MD, Butler AP, Vinogradov J (2016) Tidal influence on self-potential measurements. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 121(12):8432–8452. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jb013376
MacAllister D, Jackson MD, Butler AP, Vinogradov J (2018) Remote detection of saline intrusion in a coastal aquifer using borehole measurements of self-potential. Water Resour Res 54(3):1669–1687. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021034
Manoj C, Maus S, Chulliat A (2011) Observation of magnetic fields generated by tsunamis. Eos Trans AGU 92(2):13–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO020002
Marshalko E, Kruglyakov M, Kuvshinov A, Murphy BS, Rastäetter L, Ngwira C, Pulkkinen A (2020) Exploring the influence of lateral conductivity contrasts on the storm time behavior of the ground electric field in the eastern United States. Space Weather 18(3):e2019SW002216. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002216
Monin AS, Kamenkovich VM, Kort VG (1977) Variability of the Oceans. Wiley, London
Pelinovsky E (2006) Hydrodynamics of tsunami waves. In: Grue J, Trulsen K (eds) Waves in geophysical fluids: tsunamis, rogue waves and internal tides. CISM Courses and Lectures, No. 489. CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, Springer, Wein, New York, pp 1−48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-69356-8_1
Pezard PA, Gautier S, Le Borgne T, Legros B, Deltombe JL (2009) MuSET: a multiparameter and high precision sensor for downhole spontaneous electrical potential measurements. CR Geosci 341(10–11):957–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2009.07.009
Revil A, Jardani A (2013) The self-potential method: Theory and applications in environmental geosciences. Cambridge Univ Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094252
Sanford TB (1971) Motionally induced electric and magnetic fields in the sea. J Geophys Res 76:3476–3492
Soloviev SP, Surkov VV (1994) Electric perturbations in the atmospheric surface layer caused by an aerial shock wave. Combust Explos Shock Waves 30(1):117–121
Sorokin V, Hayakawa M (2013) Generation of seismic-related DC electric field and lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling. Modern Appl Sci 7(6):1–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v7n6p1
Sorokin VM, Yashchenko AK, Surkov VV (2019a) Generation of geomagnetic disturbances in the ionosphere by a tsunami wave. Geomagn Aeron 59(2):221–233. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793219020130
Sorokin VM, Yashchenko AK, Surkov VV (2019b) Geomagnetic field perturbations resulted from tsunami wave impact on the ionosphere. Prog Electromagn Res B 85:49–63. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERB19050201
Sorokin VM, Chmyrev VM, Hayakawa M (2020) A review on electrodynamic influence of atmospheric process to the ionosphere. Open J Earthq Res 9:113–141. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojer.2020.92008
Surkov V, Hayakawa M (2014) Ultra and extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields. Springer Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54367-1
Surkov VV, Sorokin VM, Yashchenko AK (2017) Geomagnetic perturbations caused by a sphere moving in the conducting liquid. Radiophys Quant Electron 60(7):552–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-017-9826-7
Surkov VV, Sorokin VM, Yashchenko AK (2018) Perturbations of ambient magnetic field resulted from a ball motion in a conductive liquid half-space. Prog Electromagn Res B 80:113–131. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERB18012804
Surkov VV, Sorokin VM, Yaschenko AK (2020) Seismoelectric effect in Lamb’s problem. Ann Geophys 63(4):SE440
Tyler RH, Sanford TB, Unsworth MJ (1998) Propagation of electromagnetic field in the coastal ocean with applications to underwater navigation and communication. Radio Sci 33(4):967–987
Toh H, Satake K, Hamano Y, Fujii Y, Goto T (2011) Tsunami signals from the 2006 and 2007 Kuril earthquakes detected at a seafloor geomagnetic observatory. J Geophys Res 116(B2):B02104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007873
Wang B, Liu H (2013) Space-time behaviour of magnetic anomalies induced by tsunami waves in open ocean. Proc Royal Soc A 469(257):110. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0038
Zhang L, Utada H, Shimizu H, Baba K, Maeda T (2014) Three-dimensional simulation of the electromagnetic fields induced by the 2011 Tohoku tsunami: Simulation of the EM fields of tsunami. J Geophys Res 119D(1):150–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010264
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the state contracts with Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere and Radio Wave Propagation (IZMIRAN).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Appendix
Appendix
Applying Fourier transform with respect to \(x\) to Eqs. (6) and (7), we obtain a set of the ordinary differential equations
where \(k\) is the parameter of the Fourier transform and the primes denote derivatives with respect to \(z\). Here we made use the following abbreviations
The boundary conditions (7) at \(z = 0\) are reduced to the form
Rearranging the equation set (17), yields
The solution of Eq. (20) has to be finite when \(z \to \infty\). Taking into account this condition, we obtain:
where \(C_{1} - C_{4}\) are undetermined coefficients. Substituting solution (21) into Eq. (17) and boundary conditions (19), we arrive at the following set of algebraic equations for the undetermined coefficients. Solving this set, we obtain:
Now one can find the Fourier transform of the volumetric strain:
In the spatial representation, the volumetric strain of the medium is given by:
Using Eq. (3), we can find the Fourier transform of the pressure \(p\left( k \right)\) produced by the LGW on the seabed:
Let us now substitute Eq. (25) for \(p\left( k \right)\) into Eq. (24) and then change the order of integration over \(k\) and \(x^{\prime}\). Performing the internal integration over \(k\), yields:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Surkov, V.V., Sorokin, V.M. & Yashchenko, A.K. Electrokinetic effect in porous rocks of the sea coast provided by long sea waves. Acta Geod Geophys 57, 397–409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00383-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-022-00383-7