Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Investments during institutional transitions: Driven by problems or opportunities?

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study empirically examines the firm-level motivational mechanisms that drive firms to pursue investment avenues during periods of institutional transitions. Grounding this research at the intersection of organizational adaptation driven by institutional transitions and the search processes stemming from performance problems and growth opportunities, I propose a negative (positive) relationship between the intensity of performance below aspirations (growth opportunities) and strategic investments made by firms. In addition, I propose a moderating influence of business group affiliation on the relationships mentioned above. I test and find support for the hypothesized predictions on an unbalanced panel dataset comprising 8354 firm-year observations belonging to 1695 listed manufacturing firms from the emerging market of India during the period 1995 to 2010. This study bridges the macro–micro link between institutional transitions and firm behavior by theorizing the effect of organizational search mechanisms and identifies institutional transitions as a boundary condition that mutes problemistic search leading to investments. This study has important implications for the literature on institutional transitions and a behavioral theory of the firm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Theoretically, the behavioral theory predicts a clear linkage between performance below aspirations and organizational change. However, the same is not the case for performance above aspirations. Cyert and March (1963) surmise that performance above aspirations encourages firms to persist with existing course of action and resist making changes, but “success breeds slack” (Cyert & March, 1963: pp. 189) which is consistent with the logic of slack driven search culminating in organizational changes (Xu et al., 2019). Owing to this theoretical ambiguity, this study does not focus on ‘performance above aspirations’ and its effect on strategic investments.

  2. Subsequently several improvements were undertaken to strengthen the informational, legal and judiciary infrastructure to ensure a strong capital market, but these changes occurred over a period of time.

  3. Manufacturing firms are those that operate in the National Industry Classification codes (2008 classification) ranging from 101 to 329XX. The National Industry Classification codes used to classify industries in the Indian context are similar to Standard Industrial Classification codes that are used to classify industries globally.

  4. I checked the equality of means of the main dependent variable in the sample and population to check for bias in sample due to data reduction. The independent t-test does not reject the null hypothesis (t = -1.22, p > 0.10) confirming that the distribution of the dependent variable in the sample mirrors the population.

  5. Although the period considered in this study is marked by inefficient and under-developed capital markets, subjecting the measure of market-to-book ratio to some noise, it would be applicable for the entire sample and hence I don’t expect it to bias our inferences. I thank an anonymous reviewer for raising this relevant point.

  6. Wooldridge test (F = 17.8; p < 0.01) implemented using the xtserial routine in Stata suggests presence of serial correlations in our data, while the modified Wald test (chi2 = 4.1 + e6; p < 0.01) implemented using xttest3 routine suggests presence of groupwise wise heteroskedasticity.

  7. Similar to Greve (2003a), I increased the value of α in steps of 0.1 and chose the weights which gave us the highest model “log-likelihood”. This procedure yielded a value of 0.3 for α.

  8. I sincerely thank an anonymous reviewer for this suggestion.

References

  • Ahluwalia, M. S. (2002). Economic reforms in India since 1991: Has gradualism worked? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allard, G., Martinez, C. A., & Williams, C. (2012). Political instability, pro-business market reforms, and their impacts on national systems of innovation. Research Policy, 41, 638–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. (2015). Family firms in India: Family involvement, innovation, and agency, and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32, 869–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52(1), 83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, I. (2012). A behavioral theory of market expansion based on the opportunity prospects rule. Organization Science, 23(4), 1008–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Chuang, Y. T. (2005). Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 536–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blagoeva, R., Mom, T. J. M., Jansen, J. J. P., & George, G. (2019). Problem solving or self enhancement? A power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2), 332–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., & Harris, J. D. (2014). A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromiley, P., & Washburn, M. (2011). Cost reduction vs innovative search in R&D. Journal of Strategy and Management, 4(3), 196–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B. (2000). Introduction to Research Methods. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. E. (1971). The behavioral theory of the firm and top-level corporate decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(4), 413–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, M. D. R. (2013). Business groups and foreign direct investments by developing country firms: An empirical test in India. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, M. D. R., & Banalieva, E. R. (2015). How do pro-market reforms impact firm profitability? The case of India under reform. Journal of World Business, 50, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari, M. D. R., & David, P. (2012). Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: An empirical test in the Indian context. Strategic Management Journal, 33(2), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Chittoor, R., & Vissa, B. (2021). Does nepotism run in the family? CEO pay and pay-performance sensitivity in Indian family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 1326–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. R. (2008). Determinants of firms’ backward and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science, 19(4), 609–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. R., & Miller, K. D. (2007). Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 369–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Kale, P., & Puranam, P. (2015). Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1277–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chittoor, R., Sarkar, B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2009). Third world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1), 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J., Rhee, M., & Kim, Y. C. (2019). Performance feedback and problem-driven search: The moderating effects of managerial and board outsiderness. Journal of Business Research, 13, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. R., Yoshikawa, T., Zahra, S. A., & Han, B. H. (2014). Market-oriented institutional change and R&D investments: Do business groups enhance advantage? Journal of World Business, 49(4), 466–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2006). Business groups and their types. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 419–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Dau, L. A. (2009). Pro-market reforms and firm profitability in developing countries. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1348–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A. (2013). Learning across geographic space: Pro-market reforms, multinationalization strategy, and profitability. Journal of International Business Studies, 44, 236–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M., & Kostova, T. (2020). The impact of market based institutional reforms on firm strategy and performance: Review and extension. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Yoshikawa, T., Chari, M. D., & Rasheed, A. A. (2006). Strategic investments in Japanese corporations: Do foreign portfolio owners foster underinvestment or appropriate investment? Strategic Management Journal, 27(6), 591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, V. M. (2008). Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations. Organization Science, 19(4), 594–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, M., & Sachs, W. M. (2008). Coevolution of institutions and corporations in emerging economies: How the Salim Group morphed into an institution of Suharto’s crony regime. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1274–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrev, S. D., & Carroll, G. R. (2003). Size (and competition) among organizations: Modelling scale-based selection among automobile producers in four major countries, 1885–1981. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango, B., & Pattnaik, C. (2007). Building capabilities for international operations through networks: A study of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 541–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S. (2004). Resources in emerging structures and processes of change. Organization Science, 15(3), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, C., Zuzul, T., Jones, G., & Khanna, T. (2017). Overcoming institutional voids: A reputation-based view of long-run survival. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2147–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, G. D., & Nam, J. (1998). The underinvestment problem and corporate derivatives use. Financial Management, 27(4), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghemawat, O., & Khanna, T. (1998). The nature of diversified oups: A research design and two case studies. Journal of Industrial Economics, XLVI(1), 35–62.

  • Ghoshal, S., Piramal, G., & Budhiraja, S. (2001). World class in India: A casebook of companies in transformation. Penguin books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, S., Manikandan, K. S., & Ramachandran, J. (2021). Are there limits to diversification in emerging economies? Distinguishing between firm-level and business group strategies. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12680.

  • Gopalan, R., Nanda, V., & Seru, A. (2007). Affliated firms and financial support: Evidence from Indian business groups. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(3), 759–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, L,, & Popli, M. (2021). Performance shortfall and R&D search: the effects of organizational task environments. Academy of Management Proceedings.

  • Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003a). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (2003b). Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(5), 1051–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R., & Teh, D. (2018). Goal selection internally and externally: A behavioral theory of institutionalization. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., & Ray, S. (2015). International search behavior of business group affiliated firms: Scope of institutional changes and intragroup heterogeneity. Organization Science, 26(5), 1485–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. (2010). Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F. (2000). Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillen, M. F. (2002). Structural inertia, imitation, and foreign expansion: South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 281–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., Tihanyi, L., & White, R. E. (2005). Diversified business groups and corporate refocusing in emerging economies. Journal of Management, 31(6), 941–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, H. W., Cui, L., & Aulakh, P. S. (2019). State capitalism and performance persistence of business group affiliated firms: A comparative study of India and China. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, P., & Baum, J. A. C. (1997). Chain affiliation and the failure of Manhattan hotels, 1898–1980. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 68–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, D. N., & Miller, K. D. (2008). Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 808–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, D. N., Bau, M., Chirico, F., Patel, P. C., & Brush, T. H. (2018). The triggers of local and distant search: Relative magnitude and persistence in explaining acquisition relatedness. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J., & Gaba, V. (2015). The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management Journal, 36(13), 1960–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T., Holmes, K. R., & O’Grady, M. A. (2007). Index of economic freedom: the link between economic opportunity and prosperity. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. Y., Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. (2015). All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1361–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolev, K. D., & McNamara, G. (2020). The role of top management teams in firm responses to performance shortfalls. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020962683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komera, S., Lukose, P. J., & Sasidharan, S. (2018). Does business group affiliation encourage R&D activities? Evidence from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4), 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiloglu, S., Chen, Y., & Lechler, T. (2019). Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review. Strategic Organization. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019883361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., & Aggarwal, A. (2005). Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, 34(4), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Gaur, A. S., & Pattnaik, C. (2012). Product diversification and international expansion of business groups. Management International Review, 52, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumaraswamy, A., Mudambi, R., Saranga, H., & Tripathy, A. (2012). Catch-up strategies in the Indian auto components’ industry: Domestic firms’ responses to market liberalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(4), 368–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, S., & Dhandapani, K. (2021). Project performance in emerging market: The influence of cultural distance and business group affiliation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 179–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D. (1999). Unfinished business: India in the world economy. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamin, A. (2013). Business group as an information resource: An investigation of business group affiliation in the Indian software services industry. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1487–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13(8), 585–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPorta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N. H. (1979). Entrepreneurship and economic development: The problem revisited. Journal of Economic Literature, 17, 46–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, E., & Audia, P. G. (2020). Problem-solving or self-enhancing? Influences of diversification and bright spot on corporate resource allocation responses to performance shortfalls. Strategy Science, 5(4), 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. C. M., & Bo, H. (2012). State ownership and financial constraints on investment of Chinese listed firms: New evidence. European Journal of Finance, 18(6), 497–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loderer, C., Stulz, R., & Waelchli, U. (2017). Firm rigidities and the decline in growth opportunities. Management Science, 63(9), 3000–3020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, L. H., & Wong, P. K. (2019). Performance feedback, financial slack, and the innovation behavior of firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36, 1079–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar, S. K. (1997). The impact of size and age on firm-level performance: Some evidence from India. Review of Industrial Organization, 12, 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manikandan, K. S., & Ramachandran, J. (2015). Beyond institutional voids: Business groups, incomplete markets, and organizational form. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 598–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: state, effect and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K. L. (2000). Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25, 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, J. P., & David, P. (2014). Reciprocity and R&D search: Applying the behavioral theory of the firm to a communitarian context. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 550–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

  • Pattnaik, C., Chang, J. J., & Shin, H. H. (2013). Business groups and corporate transparency in emerging markets: Empirical evidence from India. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 987–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (2008). India: The emerging giant. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posen, H. E., Keil, T., Kim, S., & Meissner, F. D. (2018). Renewing research on problem-driven search—A review and research agenda. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 208–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puffer, S. M., McCarthy, D. J., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Managing favors in a global economy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raithatha, M., & Popli, M. (2021). Persistence of past: Impact of historical institutions on corporate risk taking. Finance Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2000). A multilevel model of privatization in emerging economies. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 525–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ref, O., & Shapira, Z. (2017). Entering new markets: The effect of performance feedback near aspiration and Ill below and above it. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7), 1416–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, B. C., & Johnson, A. F. (2016). Performance, aspirations, and market versus non-market investment. Journal of Management, 42(4), 936–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahasranamam, S., Arya, B., & Sud, M. (2020). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility in an emerging market. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(4), 1165–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarta, A., Durand, R., & Vergne, J. P. (2021). Organizational adaptation. Journal of Management, 47(1), 43–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbeti, W. M., & Moosa, I. (2012). Firm-specific factors as determinants of capital structure in the absence of taxes. Applied Financial Economics, 22(3), 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. R. (2008). Economic liberalization and corporate governance: The resilience of business groups in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 40(4), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. S., He, L., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2021). Delayed and decoupled: Family firms’ compliance with board independence requirements. British Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinkle, G. A., & Kriauciunas, A. P. (2010). Institutions, size and age in transition economies: Implications for export growth. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth in domestic and international markets: Evidence from India. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 615–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3), 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., Pattnaik, C., Gaur, A. S., & Ketencioglu, E. (2018). Corporate expansion during pro-market reforms in emerging markets: The contingent value of group affiliation and unrelated diversification. Journal of Business Research, 82, 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, B. B., & Caner, T. (2016). New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 896–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissa, B., & Chacar, A. S. (2009). Leveraging ties: The contingent value of entrepreneurial teams’ external advice networks on Indian software venture performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(11), 1179–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vissa, B., Greve, H., & Chen, W. R. (2010). Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organization Science, 21(3), 696–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, F. C., & Saka-Helmhout, A. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational change: Institutionalizing the behavioral theory of the firm. Organization Studies, 27(2), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R. M., & Bromiley, P. (1996). Toward a model of risk in declining organizations: an empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organization Science, 7(5), 524–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Zhou, K. Z., & Du, F. (2019). Deviant versus aspirational risk taking: The effects of performance feedback on bribery expenditure and R&D intensity. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 1226–1251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, Y., Yu, W., & Nason, R. (2020). Performance feedback persistence: Comparative effects of historical versus peer performance feedback on innovative search. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320916225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yiu, D. W., Lu, Y., Bruton, G. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2007). Business groups: An integrated model to focus future research. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1551–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, W., Minniti, M., & Nason, R. (2019). Underperformance duration and innovative search: Evidence from the high-tech manufacturing industry. Strategic Management Journal, 40(5), 836–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., & Gong, Y. (2018). Stock Return or Sales Growth? Multiple Performance Feedback and Strategic Investments Under Securities Analysts’ Earnings Pressure. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1356–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lakshmi Goyal.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 83 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, L. Investments during institutional transitions: Driven by problems or opportunities?. Asia Pac J Manag 40, 1733–1768 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09838-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-022-09838-5

Keywords

Navigation