Skip to main content
Log in

Arsenic Reduction Kinetics during Vacuum Carbothermal Reduction of Dust with High Content of Arsenic and Copper

  • METALLURGY OF NONFERROUS METALS
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Non-Ferrous Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, arsenic removal was carried out via low-temperature vacuum carbothermal reduction method by utilizing dust containing higher content of arsenic and copper from pyrometallurgical refining furnaces of copper as raw materials. Effect of various factors such as reduction temperature, residual pressure, reductant dosage and time on the removal rate of arsenic was investigated and explored in detail. Arsenic reduction kinetics was analyzed and elaborated in detail on the basis of “shrinking-core model”. The results show that arsenic removal rate is enhanced with low reduction temperature and increasing amount of reduction dose, and decreasing residual pressure. Arsenic reduction removal is indicated to be controlled by ash diffusion. Apparent activation energy ~15.96 kJ/mol is determined for the reaction in the temperature range of 623–773 K. The kinetic equations for arsenic removal during vacuum carbothermal reduction can be described as 1 – 2a/3 – (1 – a)2/3 = 0.05774 exp[–1919.05/T]t.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Yang, K., Liu, W., Zhang, T.F., Yao, L.W., and Qin, W.Q., Water leaching of arsenic trioxide from metallurgical dust with emphasis on its kinetics, J. Cent. South Univ., 2019, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2328–2339.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, B., Ma, Y.P., Gao, W., Yang, J.K., Yang, Y.B., Li, Q., and Jiang, T., A review of the comprehensive recovery of valuable elements from copper smelting open-circuit dust and arsenic treatment, JOM, 2020, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3848–3860.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, X.L., Luo, R.K., Li, T., Chen, H., Ge, S.Z., Zhong, S.P., and Wang, J.E., Removal of arsenic in copper smelting dust, Hydrometallurgy, 2019, vol. 38, no. 18, p. 488.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, J.Q., Ma, Y.P., Xu, B., and Gao, W., Study on comprehensive recovery of copper smelting dust, Nonferrous Met., Extr. Metall., 2020, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Hang, McConnell, J., Ring, T.A., and Sutherland, J.C., Characterization of temperature criteria using gas-phase fuel streams for MILD coal combustion, Fuel, 2021, vol. 296, no. 50, p. 120445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, W.J., Che, J.Y., Wen, P.C., Xia, L., Ma, B.Z., Chen, J., and Wang, C.Y., Co-treatment of copper smelting flue dust and arsenic sulfide residue by a pyrometallurgical approach for simultaneous removal and recovery of arsenic, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, vol. 416, no. 15, p. 126149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Z.T., Li, W.F., Zhan, J., Li, G., Zhao, Z.B., and Huang, J.Y., A novel technology for the recovery of zinc from the zinc leaching residue by the bottom-blown reduction, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 2021, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karimov, K.A., Naboichenko, S.S., Kritskii, A.V., Tret’yak, M.A., and Kovyazin, A.A., Oxidation sulfuric acid autoclave leaching of copper smelting production fine dust, Metallurgist, 2019, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1244–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, T.Z., Fu, X.X., Liu, W.F., Chen, L.L., and Zhang, D.C., Hydrometallurgical treatment of copper smelting dust by oxidation leaching and fractional precipitation technology, JOM, 2017, vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 1982–1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, J.T., Huang, Z.L., Wang, Z.W., and Guo, Z.C., Recovery of crown zinc and metallic copper from copper smelter dust by evaporation, condensation and super-gravity separation, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, vol. 231, no. C, p. 115925.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kovyazin, A., Timofeev, K.L., and Krauhin, S., Copper smelting fine dust autoclave leaching, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2019, vol. 946, no. 5, pp. 615–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, Y., Wang, T., Marsh, M., and Williams, J.S., Mechanically activated carbothermic reduction of ilmenite, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1997, vol. 6, no. 28, pp. 1115–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu, K. and Zhang, R., Research on preparation of nanometer antimony trioxide from slag containing antimony by vacuum evaporation method, Vacuum, 2006, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 1016–1020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, H.J., Metallurgical Physico-Chemistry Tutorial, 2004, pp. 281–320.

  15. Tian, Y.W., Zhai, X.J., and Liu, K.R., Concise Course in Metallurgical Physical Chemistry, Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2011, pp. 223–325.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, Y.K., The kinetics of reduction of hematite by carbon, Metall. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1439–1447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hussein, M.K., Kolta, G.A., and Saba, A.E., Kinetics of calcium phosphate reduction by carbon, Themochim. Acta, 1974, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–186.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo, S.Y., Zhang, J.Y., and Zhou, S.P., Prediction System of Solid/Solid Reaction Kinetics, 2000, pp. 198–201.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (CN) (KYCX20_3133).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong Liang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Zhang, R.L., Zeng, J. et al. Arsenic Reduction Kinetics during Vacuum Carbothermal Reduction of Dust with High Content of Arsenic and Copper. Russ. J. Non-ferrous Metals 63, 269–275 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821222030026

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1067821222030026

Navigation