No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
New Amateurs and Tricksters: A manifesto for music and sound creation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 July 2022
Abstract
This article considers some of the potential advantages that creators without formal training – Barthes’s ‘amateurs’ – have employed in collaborative processes to make sound art and also considers ways in which the approach may open fresh forms of social engagement. Drawing on the author’s collaborative practice in sound creation, Maria Lind’s classification of types of collaboration is extended to develop the notion of a ‘quadruple’ variant. This is based on the relationship between human and non-human collaborators. The role of the ‘Trickster’ is developed as a means of supporting and facilitating amateurs operating in a radical context. I propose, and provide a manifesto for, a category of the ‘New Amateur’ who addresses social engagement in sound practices in at least two ways. First, via structural dependence on a notion of collaboration significantly expanded to include not only other humans but also materials, ideas and both non- and post-human entities. Second, by drawing upon the anarchist ethics and concepts of the Trickster to democratise artistic potential through collaborative and distributed authorship. Thus, the manifesto reflects a political dimension rooted in the everyday and reveals a route to social engagement via personal creative awakening. The New Amateur offers fresh possibilities in music and organised sound and engages via an unleashing of individual capability to mirror the ‘lines of flight’ pursued by John Cage, La Monte Young and Alan Kaprow. The mechanism initiated in this way locates individual creativity in the context of mutual aid. Social engagement is driven by individual creativity and the explosive awareness of the potential this awakens.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Organised Sound , Volume 28 , Issue 1: Socially Engaged Sound Practices, Part 2 , April 2023 , pp. 43 - 52
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Bailes, S. J. 2011. Performance Theatre and the Poetics of Failure: Forced Entertainment, Goat Island, Elevator Repair Service. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, E. A. 2010. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: I. B.Taurus.Google Scholar
Bell, D. M. 2017. The Politics of Participatory Art. Political Studies Review 15(1): 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, B. 2004. Art Beyond Representation: The Performative Power of the Image. London: I. B.Taurus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boym, S. 2010. The Off-Modern Mirror. e-flux journal. http://worker01.e-flux.com/pdf/article_8888175.pdf (accessed December 2019).Google Scholar
Brown, G. 2011. Amateurism and Anarchism in the Creation of Autonomous Queer Space. In Cleminson, J. H. (ed.) Anarchism and Sexuality: Ethics, Relationships and Power. London: Routledge, 200–23.Google Scholar
Cage, J. 1961. Silence. Wellesley College Library. https://archive.org/details/silencelecturesw1961cage/page/n17 (accessed January 2019).Google Scholar
Certeau, M. D. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. London and Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1993. Memoirs of the Blind: The Self-Portrait and Other Ruins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2013. Living On. In Harold Bloom, P. D. (ed.) Deconstruction and Criticism London and New York: Bloomsbury, 62–142.Google Scholar
Fisher, M. 2014. Ghosts of My Life: Writings on Depression, Hauntology and Lost Futures. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Guidi, A. C. 2019. Fluxus Scores. In Peterlini, W. R. (ed.) Sense Sound Sound Sense: Fluxus Music, Scores and Records in the Luigi Bonotti Collection. London: Whitechapel Gallery, 26–8.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. 2016. The Cyborg Manifesto. In Haraway, D. (ed.) Manifestly Harawa. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 5–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A. 2011. Infinite Music: Imagining the Next Millennium of Human Music-Making. Alresford, Hants: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Hassan, I. 1987. The Postmodern Turn: Essays in Postmodern Theory and Culture. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes-Brady, C. 2017. ‘I Kept Saying Her Name’: Naming, Labels and Power in the Early Writing of David Foster Wallace. Orbit, 5(1) 1–9. https://doi.org/1016995/orbit.214.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heddon, D. 2020. Professional Development for live Artists: Doing It Yourself. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training 11(2): 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffernan, L. 2014, November. Abstraction & the Amateur: De-disciplining T.E. Hulme. Modernism/modernity 21(4): 881–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, J. T. 1991. Music Participation: Theory, Research and Policy. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 109(Summer): 1–35.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, E. 1993. On Building Social Theories of Music Education. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education 116(Spring): 33–50.Google Scholar
Kaprow, A. 2012. Guidelines for Happenings (c.1965). In Selz, K. S. (ed.) Theories and Documents of Contemporary Art. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lind, M. 2007. The Collaborative Turn. In Johanna Billing, M. L. (ed.) Taking the Matter into Common Hands. London: Black Dog, 15–31.Google Scholar
Lochhead, J. 2009. Naming: Music and the Postmodern. New Formations 66: 158–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, P. 1989. Human Nature & Anarchism. In D. G. (ed.) For Anarchism: History, Theory & Practice. London: Routledge, 127–49.Google Scholar
Mock, R. 2000. Performing Processes: Creating Live Performance. Bristol: Intellect.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. 2013. Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Doherty, B. 1986. Inside the White Cube: The Ideology of the Gallery Space. Santa Monica, CA: Lapis Press.Google Scholar
Redhead, L. 2017. Entopic Landscape and Ijereja: Music as an Iterative Process. New Sounds 1(49): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlieben, K. 2007. Polyphonus Language and Construction of Identity: Its Dynamic and Its Crux. In Johanna Billing, M. L. (ed.) Taking Matter into Common Hands: On Contemporary Art and Collaborative Practices. London: Black Dog, 32–5.Google Scholar
Small, C. 1999. Musicking: The Meanings of Performing and Listening – A Lecture. Education Research Journal 1(1): 9–22.Google Scholar
Stebbins, R. A. 2013. From Dabbler to Serious Amateur Musician and Beyond. International Journal of Community Music 6(2): 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stévance, S. 2008. Marcel Duchamp’s Musical Secret Boxed in the Tradition of the Real: A New Instrumental Paradigm. Perspectives of New Music 45(2): 150–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. 2016. ‘Collaboration’ in Contemporary Music: A Theoretical View. Contemporary Music Review 35(6): 562–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, T. G. 2015. Editorial: Sound Art and Music – Historical Continuum and Mimetic Fissures. Organised Sound 20 (2): 141–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, B. 2020a. Being among Bluebells: Amateurism as a Mode of Queer Futurity at Duckie’s Slaughterhouse Club. Performance Research 25(1): 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox supplementary material
Fox supplementary material 1
Audio
12.9 MB
Fox supplementary material
Fox supplementary material 2
Audio
5.3 MB
Fox supplementary material
Fox supplementary material 3
Audio
8.9 MB
Fox supplementary material
Fox supplementary material 4
Audio
7.3 MB