Abstract
This study explores beginning teacher candidates’ approaches to grading in relation to their broader conceptions of assessment through a survey research design. 248 Canadian teacher candidates responded to two scales: Teachers’ Approaches to Grading (TAG) and Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment (TCOA). The results of factor analysis showed that teacher candidates approached grading in relation to four factors: (a) grade consequence, (b) holistic view of assessment, (c) holistic view of learners, and (d) classroom context. Their broad conceptions of assessment are related to three factors: (a) assessment as improvement and accountability, (b) assessment as irrelevant, and (c) assessment as inaccurate. The results of factor structures and intercorrelations within and across the TAG and TCOA scales showed that these beginning teacher candidates approached grading with variable complexity and attention to holistic view of assessment and of learners with an aim to support student learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205–221). Springer.
Alm, F., & Colnerud, G. (2015). Teachers’ experiences of unfair grading. Educational Assessment, 20, 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1028620
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor analysis: Exploratory and confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 93–114). Routledge.
Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2009). Teacher candidates’ perceptions about grading and constructivist teaching. Educational Assessment, 14, 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903039411
Bonner, S. M., & Chen, P. P. (2021). Development and validation of the survey of unorthodox grading beliefs for teachers and teacher candidates. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 39, 746–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211015462
Brookhart, S. M., Guskey, T. R., Bowers, A. J., McMillan, J. H., Smith, J. K., Smith, L. F., Stevens, M.T., Welsh, M. E. J. R. o. E. R. (2016). A century of grading research: Meaning and value in the most common educational measure. Review of Educational Research, 86, 803-848. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672069
Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb01070.x
Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers’ grading: Practice and theory. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0704_2
Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
Brown, G. T. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 11, 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
Brown, G. T. (2006). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Validation of an abridged version. Psychological Reports, 99, 166–170. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.99.1.166-170
Brown, G. T. (2011). Self-regulation of assessment beliefs and attitudes: A review of the students’ conceptions of assessment inventory. Educational Psychology, 31, 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.599836
Brown, G. T., Chaudhry, H., & Dhamija, R. (2015). The impact of an assessment policy upon teachers’ self-reported assessment beliefs and practices: A quasi-experimental study of Indian teachers in private schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.03.001
Brown, G. T., Gebril, A., & Michaelides, M. P. (2019). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A global phenomenon or a global localism. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00016
Brown, G. T., Hui, S. K., Flora, W., & Kennedy, K. J. (2011a). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Chinese contexts: A tripartite model of accountability, improvement, and irrelevance. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.10.003
Brown, G. T., Irving, S. E., Peterson, E. R., & Hirschfeld, G. H. (2009a). Use of interactive–informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students’ conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction, 19, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.003
Brown, G. T., Kennedy, K. J., Fok, P. K., Chan, J. K. S., & Yu, W. M. (2009b). Assessment for student improvement: Understanding Hong Kong teachers’ conceptions and practices of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 16, 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903319737
Brown, G. T., Lake, R., & Matters, G. (2011b). Queensland teachers’ conceptions of assessment: The impact of policy priorities on teacher attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.003
Brown, G. T., & Michaelides, M. P. (2011). Ecological rationality in teachers’ conceptions of assessment across samples from Cyprus and New Zealand. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0052-3
Brown, G. T., & Remesal, A. (2012). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A cross-cultural comparison. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37286
Campbell, C., Murphy, J., & Holt, J. (2002). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual meeting of the mid-western educational research association, Columbus, OH.
Chen, P. P., & Bonner, S. M. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs about grading practices and a constructivist approach to teaching. Educational Assessment, 22, 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1271703
Cheng, L., & Sun, Y. (2015). Teachers’ grading decision making: Multiple influencing factors and methods. Language Assessment Quarterly, 12(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2015.1010726.
Cheng, L., DeLuca, C., Braund, H., & Yan, W. (2018). Grading policies in Canada and China: A comparative study. Comparative and International Education. https://doi.org/10.5206/cie-eci.v47i1.9324.
Cheng, L., DeLuca, C., Braund, H., Yan, W., & Rasooli, A. (2020). Teachers’ grading decisions and practices across cultures: Exploring the value, consistency, and construction of grades across Canadian and Chinese secondary schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100928.
Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 1–9.
Coombs, A., DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Chalas, A. (2018). Changing approaches to classroom assessment: An empirical study across teacher career stages. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.010.
Coombs, A., Ge, J., & DeLuca, C. (2021). From sea to sea: The Canadian landscape of assessment education. Educational Research, 63(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1839353.
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 6, 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
Cross, L. H., & Frary, R. B. (1999). Hodgepodge grading: Endorsed by students and teachers alike. Applied Measurement in Education, 12, 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1201_4
Daniels, L. M., & Poth, C. A. (2017). Relationships between pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment, approaches to instruction, and assessment: An achievement goal theory perspective. Educational Psychology, 37, 835–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1293800
Daniels, L. M., Poth, C., Papile, C., & Hutchison, M. (2014). Validating the conceptions of assessment-III scale in Canadian preservice teachers. Educational Assessment, 19, 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.903654
Darmody, M., Lysaght, Z., & O’Leary, M. (2020). Irish post-primary teachers’ conceptions of assessment at a time of curriculum and assessment reform. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1761290
DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. A. (2010). Assessment literacy development: Identifying gaps in teacher candidates’ learning. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy & Practice, 17(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643.
DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Approaches to classroom assessment inventory: A new instrument to support teacher assessment literacy. Educational Assessment, 21(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1236677.
DeLuca, C., Braund, H., Valiquette, A., & Cheng, L. (2017). Grading Policies and Practices in Canada: A Landscape Study. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 184, 4–22.
DeLuca, C., Schneider, C., Coombs, A., Pozas, M., & Rasooli, A. (2020). A crosscultural comparison of German and Canadian student teachers’ assessment competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1703171.
Duncan, C. R., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment practices. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53, 1–21.
Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: A sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568
Gebril, A., & Brown, G. T. (2014). The effect of high-stakes examination systems on teacher beliefs: Egyptian teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 21, 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.831030
Gotch, C. M., Carbonneau, K. J., & Van Orman, D. S. (2021). Preparing pre-service teachers for assessment of, for, and as learning. In S. L. Nichols & D. Varier (Eds.), Teaching on assessment (pp. 17–36). Information Age Publishing Inc.
Gotch, C. M., & French, B. F. (2014). A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33, 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12030
Gottheiner, D. M., & Siegel, M. A. (2012). Experienced middle school science teachers’ assessment literacy: Investigating knowledge of students’ conceptions in genetics and ways to shape instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 531–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9278-z
Guskey, T. R. (2009). Bound by tradition: Teachers' views of crucial grading and reporting issues. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Guskey, T. R., & Link, L. J. (2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 26, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1555515
Hill, M., Cowie, B., Gilmore, A., & Smith, L. F. (2010). Preparing assessment-capable teachers: What should preservice teachers know and be able to do? Assessment Matters, 2, 44–64.
Hu, Lt., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., Vol. 29, pp. 17–64). American Council on Education and Praeger.
Kunnath, J. P. (2017). Teacher grading decisions: Influences, rationale, and practices. American Secondary Education, 45, 68–88.
Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32, 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214554321
Link, L. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of grading practices: How pre-service training makes a difference. Journal of Research in Education, 28, 62–91.
Looney, A., Cumming, J., van Der Kleij, F., & Harris, K. (2018). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 25, 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090
Lutovac, S., & Flores, M. A. (2022). Conceptions of assessment in pre-service teachers’ narratives of students’ failure. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1935736
Maul, A. (2017). Rethinking traditional methods of survey validation. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 15, 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366367.2017.1348108
McMillan, J. H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
McMillan, J. H. (2019). Surveys of teachers’ grading practices and perceptions. In T. R. Guskey & S. M. Brookhart (Eds.), What we know about grading: What works, What doesn’t, and What’s next. ASCD.
McMillan, J. H., Myran, S., & Workman, D. (2002). Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596593
Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 33, 49–64.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 13–103). Macmillan Publishing Company.
Newton, P., & Shaw, S. (2014). Validity in educational and psychological assessment. Sage Publications.
Nowruzi, M. (2021). A study of EFL teachers’ classroom grading practices in secondary schools and private institutes: A mixed methods approach. Language Testing in Asia, 11, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00145-2
Nowruzi, M., & Amerian, M. (2020). Exploring the factors Iranian EFL institute teachers consider in grading using personal construct theory. Teaching English as a Second Language (formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 38, 123–164. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2020.36293.2780
Olsen, B., & Buchanan, R. (2019). An investigation of teachers encouraged to reform grading practices in secondary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 56, 2004–2039. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219841349
Ontario Ministry of Education (OME). (2010). Growing success: assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. Queen’s Printer.
Osborne, J. W. (2014). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003
Plake, B. S., Impara, J. C., & Fager, J. J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: ISsues and Practice, 12, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00548.x
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
Randall, J., & Engelhard, G. (2010). Examining the grading practices of teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008
Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018). Re-conceptualizing classroom assessment fairness: A systematic meta-ethnography of assessment literature and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 164–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008.
Resh, N. (2009). Justice in grades allocation: Teachers’ perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9073-z
Schneider, C., & Bodensohn, R. (2017). Student teachers’ appraisal of the importance of assessment in teacher education and self-reports on the development of assessment competence. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 24, 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1293002
Segers, M., & Tillema, H. (2011). How do Dutch secondary teachers and students conceive the purpose of assessment? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.008
Shepard, L. (2001). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 1066–1101). AERA.
Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for the plunge: Preservice teachers’ assessment literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6
Simon, M., Tierney, R., Forgette-Giroux, R., Charland, J., Noonan, B., & Duncan, R. (2010). A secondary school teacher’s description of the process of determining report card grades. McGill Journal of Education, 45, 535–554. https://doi.org/10.7202/1003576ar
Smith, L. F., Hill, M. F., Cowie, B., & Gilmore, A. (2014). Preparing teachers to use the enabling power of assessment. In C. Wyatt-Smith, V. Klenowski, & P. Colbert (Eds.), Designing assessment for quality learning (pp. 418–445). Springer.
Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.
Sun, Y., & Cheng, L. (2014). Teachers’ grading practices: Meaning and values assigned. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.768207.
Svennberg, L., Meckbach, J., & Redelius, K. (2014). Exploring PE teachers’‘gut feelings’: An attempt to verbalise and discuss teachers’ internalised grading criteria. European Physical Education Review, 20, 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13517437
Tierney, R. D. (2006). Changing practices: Influences on classroom assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 13, 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940601035387
Tierney, R. D., Simon, M., & Charland, J. (2011). Being fair: Teachers’ interpretations of principles for standards-based grading. The Educational Forum, 75, 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.577669
Tippin, G. K., Lafreniere, K. D., & Page, S. (2012). Student perception of academic grading: Personality, academic orientation, and effort. Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411429187
Trobia, A. (2008). Cronbach's alpha. In Lavrakas P. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods, Vol. 1 & 2, pp. 168–170. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Varier, D., & Nichols, S. L. (2021). Introduction: Toward a better understanding of assessment in teaching and teacher preparation. In S. L. Nichols & D. Varier (Eds.), Teaching on assessment (pp. 1–14). Information Age Publishing Inc.
Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 749–770.
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40, 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn, J., III., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in Education, 17, 31–74. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X017001031
Wyatt-Smith, C., Alexander, C., Fishburn, D., & McMahon, P. (2017). Standards of practice to standards of evidence: Developing assessment capable teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 24, 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1228603
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6, 133–158.
Xu, Y., & He, L. (2019). How pre-service teachers’ conceptions of assessment change over practicum: Implications for teacher assessment literacy. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00145
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an Insight Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. We also want to thank Wei Yan and Heather Braund for their work at the early stage of the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasooli, A., DeLuca, C. & Cheng, L. Beginning teacher candidates’ approaches to grading and assessment conceptions—implications for teacher education in assessment. Educ Res Policy Prac 22, 63–90 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09320-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09320-5